![]() |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "Harry" wrote in message ... wrote: It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. Wait a minute. The labor unions have had a mighty strong negotiating positions with management for many years. Those negotiations affect management decisions, good or bad. You can't say that unions don't have an affect on the company's direction or future, as you have already stated that their purpose includes "to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management." Eisboch Yes. They have had strong positions in the past. Not so much in recent times. Blame is universal. Now that we've solved this, it's time to get back to the other, more pressing issues, such as John Edward's love child, ummm... the Supreme Court decision. :) -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 24/01/2010 5:23 PM, bpuharic wrote: He was trying to say stocks are overpriced right now. If "right now" is last week I agree There was a big correction Thursday and Friday after Obama announced he was cracking down on wall street. great the thieves are getting worried No, the thieves like me have already cashed out waiting for dips and good prices as people panic. Made 30%+ last year on this trick. I was cashing out in December and the first week of January. Have to love this volitily. Cha-ching! All possible for lib-dimwits insatiable need for cheap easy debt. The real question is if that will blow over and people will continue to buy the market up or whether they will cash in and wait for better news before the start buying again. the real question is if congress will let the president reign in the banks or will they start the traditional crap about class warfare like one republican did last week Hot air tought talk on Obama is a ruse, BS, sucker bait. Banks has him by the balls. A better position than GM had, and GM got $100 billion for it's criminal debt problems. Just hot air from talk a lot. Sounds like a street jive,w e will get the money back. Who is he BSing? GM on the books only owes US treasury $6.7 billion. You do the math. Just flack. Obama is mad because China is pulling his credit. Just like a spoiled debtor that didn't pay the car loan blaming the bank. Wow... $100B. Let me guess, you pulled that number out of your butt. Actually, I didn't have to guess. -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"CalifBill" wrote in message
... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:29:22 -0500, John H wrote: Them's blasphemous words around here, my friend. If there's the slightest chance a post can be called 'racist', the libs here will do so, unless a lib made the post, of course. the right thinks that racism never existed in this country...unless it's blacks against poor, innocent, concerned whites... the history of lynching not withstanding Blacks in the south were racist also. Yeah, all those lynchings and cross-burnings. The blacks did it! -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"CalifBill" wrote in message
... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:13:12 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/01/2010 12:01 PM, bpuharic wrote: it's not that government is too large. it's that it's been captured by the very people it's supposed to regulate, and has often turned against the people who give it its power And because the voters are politically corrupted themselves. "Obama will pay for my gas and morgage...". the biggest spender in US history was george bush again and again you keep telling me obama was president for 8 years got proof, or do right winger have a short attention span? ... Low morals, low wisdom, low life entitlement mentality. you guys go on about small govt THEN tell us you want the govt to be in the morals business another contradiction in right wing theology Why do you say Bush is the Biggest Spender? At the rate that Obama and Congress are burning through money, they have almost caught up in a year what it took Congress, both Republican and Democrat controlled versions, and Bush 8 years to spend. The current people in control are talking another stimulus bill. They may pass Bush in 18 months. And set records that will doom us to 3rd world status. Use your boat now, as you will not be able to afford to at the rate Congress and Obama are piling up debt. Sounds like a paranoid delusion to me... -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
Eisboch wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message ... wrote: It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. Wait a minute. The labor unions have had a mighty strong negotiating positions with management for many years. Those negotiations affect management decisions, good or bad. You can't say that unions don't have an affect on the company's direction or future, as you have already stated that their purpose includes "to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management." Eisboch I did not state or imply that unions have no effect on management decisions. I did say a union's responsibility is to its members, not to corporate management or shareholders. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... You earn $100. You get to keep $90. You earn $100,000. You get to keep $90,000. Which would you pick? Dumb example. People who choose to ignore an education and/or are lazy don't have the option to choose a $100K income. or they could be black, jewish, women, latino, etc. Uneducated black, Jewish, women, Latino, etc. I worked in the Silicon Valley as an engineer. Lots of Jewish, Black and Latino coworkers making in excess of $100k. All had university educations. Lots of black, Jewish, women, Latino, etc. Working as assemblers and janitors and secretaries that made a hell of a lot less than the engineers. They also did not have advanced education. And most of us making a $100k plus were working more hours than those making $35k or so. Probably working harder also. I worked and put myself through college, did take advantage of the corporate tuition reimbursement to help pay for that. Evil corporation, making it advantageous for me to go to school. My nephew, makes very little, mostly odd jobs, 45 years old. Thought he was a computer guru, but never went to JC, or night school to get a certificate, etc. Lazy. Problem with most of those in dire straights, other than those with major health problems, is lack of education or lazy. All true no doubt, but that doesn't include all people making $35K/year. -- Nom=de=Plume 35k is not dire straights. With four kids???? You're cracked. -- Nom=de=Plume And you are clueless to the real world. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:09:44 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message ... wrote: It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. Wait a minute. The labor unions have had a mighty strong negotiating positions with management for many years. how? if management didnt like the deal, they shut down the plant and move to a right to work state that the right wing has so thoughtfully provided. or they just wait out the strike then hire scabs, legal because of the right wing unions have no power at all. that's why they dont exist in this country |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:58:45 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/01/2010 5:23 PM, bpuharic wrote: He was trying to say stocks are overpriced right now. If "right now" is last week I agree There was a big correction Thursday and Friday after Obama announced he was cracking down on wall street. great the thieves are getting worried No, the thieves like me have already cashed out waiting for dips and good prices as people panic. Made 30%+ last year on this trick. I was cashing out in December and the first week of January. no, the thieves are worried that they cant continue stealing. Have to love this volitily. Cha-ching! All possible for lib-dimwits insatiable need for cheap easy debt. unfortunately i work for a living. dont have time to do everything. unlike wall street i actually work in a productive capacity The real question is if that will blow over and people will continue to buy the market up or whether they will cash in and wait for better news before the start buying again. the real question is if congress will let the president reign in the banks or will they start the traditional crap about class warfare like one republican did last week Hot air tought talk on Obama is a ruse, BS, sucker bait. Banks has him by the balls. A better position than GM had, and GM got $100 billion for it's criminal debt problems. that may be right. we'll see. and GM? got the bailout from bush...that's when the plan was developed you right whiners think obama's been president for 8 years Just hot air from talk a lot. Sounds like a street jive,w e will get the money back. Who is he BSing? GM on the books only owes US treasury $6.7 billion. You do the math. Just flack. Obama is mad because China is pulling his credit. Just like a spoiled debtor that didn't pay the car loan blaming the bank. GM's bailout is 3% of TARP. how much did bush spend on AIG? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com