BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
Harry wrote:
On 1/30/10 1:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


wrote in message
...



nom=de=plume wrote:



wrote in message
...




nom=de=plume wrote:




wrote in message
...





nom=de=plume wrote:





"Bill wrote in
message
...






wrote in message
...






On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:40:09 -0500,

wrote:







The top brackets ought to be paying 49%, and there should
be
no
cap
on
earnings subject to social security and medicare taxes.






As long as the top 1% controls 50% of the campaign
contributions
and
100% of the media you won't see that. They may pass that
as
the
published top rate but there will be enough tax shelters
and
loopholes
so they won't actually pay that.
The government has a long rich history of using the tax
code
to
drive
social policy. If you do politically correct things you
get
tax
breaks, big ones.






Is why there will never be a flat tax. Taxation is the
ultimate
control.







A flat tax is regressive.







That's impossible. Flat is flat. It can't be flat *and*
regressive.

I like the idea of a flat tax. Take 15% of my AGI, I'll save
$375
from
the CPA's bill, and life moves on.





What brain are you using??? If it's the same marginal rate for
everyone,
those at the lower end get screwed. I like the idea of a 40'
diameter
cherry
pie, but I don't want one in my kitchen.






They aren't screwed. They pay the same % in taxes as those who
chose
to
get an education, not have 15 kids, get a good job, and pay
their
fair
share of taxes.

You seem to be defending the reprobates of America. Why?




You seem to have stopped thinking. Read my other posts. I'm
assuming
you
know how to read for meaning of course.





I don't have time to read all of your posts. I work for a
living.
I
assume you simply forgot to punctuate that last sentence, right?




I work for a living also. I work for myself. I make a decent
living.
It's
more than $35K. :)




I don't know where $35K was discussed so you are probably just over
that.
If that's the case, you definitely don't want to get into an income
****ing match!


Certainly not with such an important and impressive person such as
yourself... a VP after all.



You asked - remember? I'm not big into titles - I prefer results
from
my
staff and the bonus checks that follow.


I never asked you for your title. I never asked you for your salary.


You asked what I did. The title simply defines the position. I guess
I
could have just said sales but that is an ambiguous position and I'm
technically not a salesperson. I never divulged my salary and you
never
asked - what made you bring that up?


No I didn't. VP means nothing. You could be a VP of ladies underwear.
Don't
care about your salary. I'm sure it's "substantial."





Bruce, aka Rob, aka DK, aka Dan Krueger, lives in a tract house with a
short driveway and a little yard.

Bull****. What else would you expect?

Where do you live? How much do you make? Who cares?

--
Nom=de=Plume

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

On Jan 30, 9:00*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message

...



Harry wrote:
On 1/30/10 1:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
*wrote in message
news:7eednb2Yx4BgK_7WnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@giganews. com...
nom=de=plume wrote:
* wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* *wrote in message
news:h_qdnVvCJ53Eef3WnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@gigan ews.com...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* * wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* * *wrote in message
news:49idnevpTsXlA8bWnZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d@g iganews.com...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* * * wrote in message
news:0MudnTDVYNmuwMfWnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d @giganews.com...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Bill * * * *wrote in
message
...

* * * *wrote in message
news:dqnjl5l73fvlugoor8537acghkoav ...

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:40:09 -0500,

wrote:

The top brackets ought to be paying 49%, and there should
be
no
cap
on
earnings subject to social security and medicare taxes..

As long as the top 1% controls 50% of the campaign
contributions
and
100% of the media you won't see that. They may pass that
as
the
published top rate but there will be enough tax shelters
and
loopholes
so they won't actually pay that.
The government has a long rich history of using the tax
code
to
drive
social policy. If you do politically correct things you
get
tax
breaks, big ones.

Is why there will never be a flat tax. *Taxation is the
ultimate
control.

A flat tax is regressive.

That's impossible. * Flat is flat. *It can't be flat *and*
regressive.

I like the idea of a flat tax. *Take 15% of my AGI, I'll save
$375
from
the CPA's bill, and life moves on.

What brain are you using??? If it's the same marginal rate for
everyone,
those at the lower end get screwed. I like the idea of a 40'
diameter
cherry
pie, but I don't want one in my kitchen.

They aren't screwed. *They pay the same % in taxes as those who
chose
to
get an education, not have 15 kids, get a good job, and pay
their
fair
share of taxes.

You seem to be defending the reprobates of America. *Why?

You seem to have stopped thinking. Read my other posts. I'm
assuming
you
know how to read for meaning of course.

I don't have time to read all of your posts. *I work for a
living.
I
assume you simply forgot to punctuate that last sentence, right?

I work for a living also. I work for myself. I make a decent
living.
It's
more than $35K. :)

I don't know where $35K was discussed so you are probably just over
that.
If that's the case, you definitely don't want to get into an income
****ing match!

Certainly not with such an important and impressive person such as
yourself... a VP after all.

You asked - remember? *I'm not big into titles - I prefer results
from
my
staff and the bonus checks that follow.

I never asked you for your title. I never asked you for your salary..

You asked what I did. *The title simply defines the position. *I guess
I
could have just said sales but that is an ambiguous position and I'm
technically not a salesperson. *I never divulged my salary and you
never
asked - what made you bring that up?

No I didn't. VP means nothing. You could be a VP of ladies underwear.
Don't
care about your salary. I'm sure it's "substantial."

Bruce, aka Rob, aka DK, aka Dan Krueger, lives in a tract house with a
short driveway and a little yard.

Bull****. *What else would you expect?

Where do you live? How much do you make? Who cares?

--
Nom=de=Plume

You care, D'Plume. Otherwise you would not be asking about his
residence or financial status.

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:







Dumb example. People who choose to ignore an education and/or
are
lazy
don't have the option to choose a $100K income.






Talk about elitist! I thought that was the exclusive realm of
the
left.







I said "dumb example". You read that, right?





You said "choose to ignore an education and/or are lazy." That
sounds
elitist to me.






Elitist? Go visit your local college campus. Are all of those
kids
elitists because they applied themselves and stayed out of
trouble?




All of the kids in college have applied themselves and stayed out
of
trouble? Really? All of them? Wow.





Enough to take the next step to better themselves. I know there are
dropouts, so I properly chose to add the word "all" in my last
statement.
You chose to spin it and...it didn't work.



So, you're claiming that "all those kids" the ones who are in college
are
there because they chose to better themselves. Not a single one is
there
because of some other reason. Keep at it "bruce"




I said "Are all of those kids elitists because they applied themselves
and
stayed out of trouble?" and you sent it into another direction - as
usual.




Whatever you say Mr. important VP of a Fortune 1000 company. Sure.



You ran out of material? The spin is over?


For you, apparently. Why don't you shift identies again, so you'll feel
more
important.


Two minutes to reply?

Move on.


moveon.org

BTW, after I log out today, I won't be responding to your juvee posts.
You'll have to switch identities again.

--
Nom=de=Plume

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

On 1/31/10 12:44 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:







Dumb example. People who choose to ignore an education and/or
are
lazy
don't have the option to choose a $100K income.






Talk about elitist! I thought that was the exclusive realm of
the
left.







I said "dumb example". You read that, right?





You said "choose to ignore an education and/or are lazy." That
sounds
elitist to me.






Elitist? Go visit your local college campus. Are all of those
kids
elitists because they applied themselves and stayed out of
trouble?




All of the kids in college have applied themselves and stayed out
of
trouble? Really? All of them? Wow.





Enough to take the next step to better themselves. I know there are
dropouts, so I properly chose to add the word "all" in my last
statement.
You chose to spin it and...it didn't work.



So, you're claiming that "all those kids" the ones who are in college
are
there because they chose to better themselves. Not a single one is
there
because of some other reason. Keep at it "bruce"




I said "Are all of those kids elitists because they applied themselves
and
stayed out of trouble?" and you sent it into another direction - as
usual.




Whatever you say Mr. important VP of a Fortune 1000 company. Sure.



You ran out of material? The spin is over?


For you, apparently. Why don't you shift identies again, so you'll feel
more
important.


Two minutes to reply?

Move on.


moveon.org

BTW, after I log out today, I won't be responding to your juvee posts.
You'll have to switch identities again.



Krueger's wife said she wished he changed his underwear and socks as
often as his ID here.

That's what I heard... :)

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:37:54 -0500, Bruce wrote:

John H wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:59:22 -0500, wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:

It means exactly that. $9500 vs. $80K? Is that a difficult comparison
for
you? Which would you pick?






As a percentage. It's relative. The two individuals in your scenario
don't have the option to "pick".




No... really? Yes, as a percentage...

If you could chose your situation was the question. duhhh...





That's a pointless question - duhhh.



For a VP of a Fortune 1000 company perhaps?




How is a career choice an option if the individual chooses to be lazy?


Do you think all people who aren't VPs of Fortune 1000 companies lazy?



More doubletalk. You are too obvious!

Holy ****. You jumped on me for my back and forths with Loogy. Have
you thought about the same thing with regard to you and d'Plum?

You and Loogy were "friends" at one point, right? Apples and oranges, John.

Oh. I sure hope you and d'plum never become friends!
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:41:57 -0500, Bruce wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don wrote in message
...

"John wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:59:22 -0500, wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:

It means exactly that. $9500 vs. $80K? Is that a difficult
comparison
for
you? Which would you pick?






As a percentage. It's relative. The two individuals in your
scenario
don't have the option to "pick".




No... really? Yes, as a percentage...

If you could chose your situation was the question. duhhh...





That's a pointless question - duhhh.



For a VP of a Fortune 1000 company perhaps?




How is a career choice an option if the individual chooses to be lazy?


Do you think all people who aren't VPs of Fortune 1000 companies lazy?



More doubletalk. You are too obvious!

Holy ****. You jumped on me for my back and forths with Loogy. Have
you thought about the same thing with regard to you and d'Plum?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Bruce/Diaper Dan/Dk/Kruger doesn't think. His mom does that for him.
That's why the only employment he can get is at his mothers company...
Elite Contr. Supply



I knew John couldn't help it but read my posts...



He read mine. You can follow a thread, right?

You are correct. Once I knocked out d'plums 189 +- posts, there was a
string of about 20+ 'Bruce' posts that caught my attention.

Poor d'plum can't believe someone wouldn't drool over each and every
one of her posts.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:37:54 -0500, Bruce wrote:

John H wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:59:22 -0500, wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:

It means exactly that. $9500 vs. $80K? Is that a difficult
comparison
for
you? Which would you pick?






As a percentage. It's relative. The two individuals in your
scenario
don't have the option to "pick".




No... really? Yes, as a percentage...

If you could chose your situation was the question. duhhh...





That's a pointless question - duhhh.



For a VP of a Fortune 1000 company perhaps?




How is a career choice an option if the individual chooses to be
lazy?


Do you think all people who aren't VPs of Fortune 1000 companies lazy?



More doubletalk. You are too obvious!

Holy ****. You jumped on me for my back and forths with Loogy. Have
you thought about the same thing with regard to you and d'Plum?

You and Loogy were "friends" at one point, right? Apples and oranges,
John.

Oh. I sure hope you and d'plum never become friends!
--


mmmm ..........bit of an insurrection in the ranks, Lt Colonel?
Better nip it in the bud before it spreads.

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

On 2/1/2010 4:12 PM, Don White wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:37:54 -0500, wrote:

John H wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:59:22 -0500, wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:

It means exactly that. $9500 vs. $80K? Is that a difficult
comparison
for
you? Which would you pick?






As a percentage. It's relative. The two individuals in your
scenario
don't have the option to "pick".




No... really? Yes, as a percentage...

If you could chose your situation was the question. duhhh...





That's a pointless question - duhhh.



For a VP of a Fortune 1000 company perhaps?




How is a career choice an option if the individual chooses to be
lazy?


Do you think all people who aren't VPs of Fortune 1000 companies lazy?



More doubletalk. You are too obvious!

Holy ****. You jumped on me for my back and forths with Loogy. Have
you thought about the same thing with regard to you and d'Plum?

You and Loogy were "friends" at one point, right? Apples and oranges,
John.

Oh. I sure hope you and d'plum never become friends!
--


mmmm ..........bit of an insurrection in the ranks, Lt Colonel?
Better nip it in the bud before it spreads.


John, I apologize, I shouldn't have said that, it was childish and
uncalled for.

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:41:57 -0500, Bruce wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don wrote in message
...

"John wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:59:22 -0500, wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:

It means exactly that. $9500 vs. $80K? Is that a difficult
comparison
for
you? Which would you pick?






As a percentage. It's relative. The two individuals in your
scenario
don't have the option to "pick".




No... really? Yes, as a percentage...

If you could chose your situation was the question. duhhh...





That's a pointless question - duhhh.



For a VP of a Fortune 1000 company perhaps?




How is a career choice an option if the individual chooses to be
lazy?


Do you think all people who aren't VPs of Fortune 1000 companies
lazy?



More doubletalk. You are too obvious!

Holy ****. You jumped on me for my back and forths with Loogy. Have
you thought about the same thing with regard to you and d'Plum?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and
in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Bruce/Diaper Dan/Dk/Kruger doesn't think. His mom does that for him.
That's why the only employment he can get is at his mothers company...
Elite Contr. Supply



I knew John couldn't help it but read my posts...



He read mine. You can follow a thread, right?

You are correct. Once I knocked out d'plums 189 +- posts, there was a
string of about 20+ 'Bruce' posts that caught my attention.

Poor d'plum can't believe someone wouldn't drool over each and every
one of her posts.
--

Proud member of the angry mob.

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.


Apparently, you both do that... disgusting as it is...

--
Nom=de=Plume

BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
 

John H wrote:



Holy ****. You jumped on me for my back and forths with Loogy. Have
you thought about the same thing with regard to you and d'Plum?


You and Loogy were "friends" at one point, right? Apples and oranges, John.

Oh. I sure hope you and d'plum never become friends!


That will never happen.