|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:02:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Please show me where I said it was one side. Stop blaming Clinton and the democrats for something that's obviously been supported far longer and with more fervor by the right wing." Both accurate statements. Your point? -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:08:00 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Roth" is a lot better way to go. You can't always convert to Roths, although I did that with much of my former 401Ks. I'm certainly glad I did, but it wasn't cheap. -- That advantage of a Roth is you know how much Sammy will let you keep. I really think that when the boomers get serious about drawing down their 401k the tax rate will be draconian. It is already "ordinary income" not capital gains. Maybe... unless they change the rules. -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"CalifBill" wrote in message
... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:43:42 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "CalifBill" wrote in message news:gpudnR6F_LQuacHWnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@earthlink .com... 35k is not dire straights. With four kids???? You're cracked. -- Nom=de=Plume And you are clueless to the real world. Really. Please show us where in the US that $35K/year for a family with four kids is doing well... go for it. for the right wing, $35K is 35K too much for a family of 4. Blow it out your ass, idiot. It is not easy street, but it is a hell of along ways from dire straights. Right... four kids... and that's gross salary. -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:05:32 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:01:55 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: i never said it did. i said being white, male and educated means you'll probably make more money than being black, male and educated Not what you stated at all. yeah. just like you think slavery didnt exist |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:00:19 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:04:26 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: ROFLMAO!! yes, i knew that. both of them. and it's the exception that proves the rule. you right wingers just love your little myths, don't you? Only 26% of North Carolina people owned slaves. Ignorant twit. why? that not enough for you? |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:59 -0500, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H wrote: It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money. Liberal thinking is quite strange. now let's see...which justices voted to allow even MORE corruption in the system? oh...the conservative ones Cite? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34822247...supreme_court/ "The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion, joined by his four more conservative colleagues. Strongly disagreeing, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent, "The court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the nation." Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Stevens' dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the courtroom. You did say corruption, right? Where was that in your cite? |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:24 -0500, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:26:38 -0600, wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:55:46 -0500, bpuharic wrote: you have a point. i hope folks dont forget bush. but it looks like mebbe they are. Disband the Senate? Your normally post a lot of weird **** but this is just dumb. uh why? what function does the senate serve? and, yes, there are plenty of democracies without a 'higher' chamber. so, other than your assertion that it's dumb, do you have any evidence? history is on my side, it seems I'd like to see shorter terms and term limits, but the senate is part of our constitution. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
Bruce wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:59 -0500, wrote: bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H wrote: It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money. Liberal thinking is quite strange. now let's see...which justices voted to allow even MORE corruption in the system? oh...the conservative ones Cite? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34822247...supreme_court/ "The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion, joined by his four more conservative colleagues. Strongly disagreeing, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent, "The court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the nation." Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Stevens' dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the courtroom. You did say corruption, right? Where was that in your cite? Bruce, apparently, is another right-winger who cannot think in the abstract. Figures. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com