On Dec 23, 4:12*pm, Gene wrote:


...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....
But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

I'm still on the fence. I find it hard to beleive that, if it weren't
true, it would be all over CNN, MSNC, etc... but it's not. Not a
peep. They'd be dancing in the street to shoot down this lie, but no
dancing. It is hard to beleive, but...


...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

As I wrote, that ship has sailed. Nothing of a religious content is
allowed on any government property without it being protested and
lawsuit-filed out of existence. A better question is why are the
liberal anti-christian protestors being silent about religious-themed
decorations now? If it were Bush, they'd be rioting in the street.
Hell, he couldn't play a round of golf without 15 minutes of negative
new coverage. You know the answer... because it's BO... he's
special... he gets a pass for everything.

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?)
Yes it is!

and what do we get? Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Preposterous? No.
Unlikely? Not really.
Proven untrue? Surprisingly, not yet.
If true? Tasteless ****heads... whoever is responsible.

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....



But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Dec 23, 7:08*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene





wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28 pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....

But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?

You mean this?

"FOX FIVE NEWS COVERED ME AND MY BALL!
Hello gentle Americans. Fox Five News has commented on me and my ball
that is handing (sic) on the White House Xmas tree. Who would of
thought I would have the most famous ball in the nation! Here is the
link to the video on youtube:"

So Hedda admits it. This is some funny stuff!! The NG idiots were
claiming all day it was just a bunch of Christian wingnuts, just to
find out that they are the ones looking like idiots! You just can't
make this stuff up. Or, I guess a liberal can. ;-

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:04:51 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:08:20 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....



But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?

I did....

"It was there in the silence that it hit me; yes one of my balls is
hanging in the White House. When I looked at the photo of the ball, it
was not my signature green color...."
http://heddalettuce.com/?p=2250

Oh Gene, I expected much better of you. For some reason, you clipped
the rest of Hedda's post. Here, I'll put it up for you:

"Not only was my ball hanging in the White House, my blue ball is
hanging in the White House.

I may never get equal rights, I may never be blond and pencil thin, I
may never see Lady Gaga in concert this winter at Madison Square
Garden (I could not get a ticket) but one of my balls is hanging in
the White House with my name for all to see. Just for today that feels
a bit better than me having the right to marry.

Stay fresh,

http://tinyurl.com/yczq6rg


Gosh, I'd expect that from Harry, but not from you.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Dec 24, 10:07*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:04:51 -0500, Gene





wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:08:20 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

There was certainly no indignation from the left back then..

...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who
now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously
unbelievable....

But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian
Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free
person should have an issue with him, no?

Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported
as fact..... and believed without question by so many.....

...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to
be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right
Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT.....

In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments
(isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but
some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore....

Common sense is dead....

Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the
story.

Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected?

I did....

"It was there in the silence that it hit me; yes one of my balls is
hanging in the White House. When I looked at the photo of the ball, it
was not my signature green color...."
http://heddalettuce.com/?p=2250

Oh Gene, I expected much better of you. For some reason, you clipped
the rest of Hedda's post. Here, I'll put it up for you:

"Not only was my ball hanging in the White House, my blue ball is
hanging in the White House.

I may never get equal rights, I may never be blond and pencil thin, I
may never see Lady Gaga in concert this winter at Madison Square
Garden (I could not get a ticket) but one of my balls is hanging in
the White House with my name for all to see. Just for today that feels
a bit better than me having the right to marry.

Stay fresh,

http://tinyurl.com/yczq6rg

Gosh, I'd expect that from Harry, but not from you.

They're all in denial... They deny that Obama has chairman Mao hanging
in the WH, they deny that the dems are primarily responsible for the
near collapse of the housing market and banking system, they deny that
Obama and the dems are intent on destroying the very fabric of what
makes this country great.

"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the
world.
I hope you'll join with me, as we try to change it..." -- Barrack
Obama

Change it, indeed. Obama is Carter redux. One term and he's out.