So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

On Nov 23, 9:35*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was
not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited
their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey...
Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying
to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media
outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But
still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority
Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for
the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for
public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say
worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with?

On 11/24/09 1:23 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Nov 23, 9:35 pm, I am wrote:
So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Well, yet again today the New York Lies printed information that "was
not meant for public consumption". Only of course because it suited
their bias agenda. Anybody who would read this paper is just dopey...
Hope they go out of business soon, of course the DNC is already trying
to set up a bail out for them and other bought and paid for media
outlets while trying to silence anybody who questions them... But
still they (The New York Lies), and of course the rest of the Minority
Media won't publish any information on the bogus information used for
the bulk of the phony studys by the ICPP, because "it wasn't meant for
public consumption". Can you say double standard, can you say
worthless rag I wouldn't clean up dog crap with?

Google Earth photos show you do not clean up your dog's crap.


--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

On 11/24/09 1:46 PM, thunder wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.


Don't forget WND, aka World Nutcase Daily.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:47:27 -0500, H the K wrote:


You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.


Don't forget WND, aka World Nutcase Daily.

You've probably heard already, but Murdoch is apparently close to making
a deal. Microsoft's Bing search engine will become the exclusive handler
of all things News Corp. Murdoch is a smart man, but he doesn't use the
internet, and this deal seems very flawed. It will be interesting to
watch. MediaNews is also planning to go along.

On 11/24/09 2:04 PM, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:47:27 -0500, H the K wrote:


You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.


Don't forget WND, aka World Nutcase Daily.

You've probably heard already, but Murdoch is apparently close to making
a deal. Microsoft's Bing search engine will become the exclusive handler
of all things News Corp. Murdoch is a smart man, but he doesn't use the
internet, and this deal seems very flawed. It will be interesting to
watch. MediaNews is also planning to go along.


I'm sure Faux will "weigh" what Bing finds in a search differently than
an honest search engine.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:05:59 -0500, H the K wrote:

On 11/24/09 2:04 PM, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:47:27 -0500, H the K wrote:


You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite
news source, Fox.


Don't forget WND, aka World Nutcase Daily.

You've probably heard already, but Murdoch is apparently close to
making a deal. Microsoft's Bing search engine will become the
exclusive handler of all things News Corp. Murdoch is a smart man, but
he doesn't use the internet, and this deal seems very flawed. It will
be interesting to watch. MediaNews is also planning to go along.


I'm sure Faux will "weigh" what Bing finds in a search differently than
an honest search engine.

I don't know how Bing weighs it's linking. It just seems like a dumb
deal. Google provides 30% of the hits at the Wall Street Journal alone.
Cutting that off would seem to be a big revenue hit. Like I said, it
will be interesting to watch.