In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you?




--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you?

Just looked. Thanks. Responded.

On 11/24/09 4:59 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you?

Just looked. Thanks. Responded.


Hmmmm. email must be running s...l...o...w



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:31:13 -0500, H the K
wrote:

On 11/24/09 4:59 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:57:45 -0500, H the
wrote:

On 11/24/09 1:52 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:35:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

So, the New York Lies decided not to post any information found in the
hacked Global Taxing Scam papers hacked last week because "they may have
been obtained illegally, and they were not meant for public
consumption". These are the same ****ers who had no problem publishing
military secrets and all of the information they could hand AlQueda
about our intelligence gathering methods. What a bunch of ****ing
assholes, hopefully they go under soon. Maybe if we are lucky, the next
terrorist act will take out their building...

Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...


You couldn't launch a bar of soap...and probably don't.

He's got a paper subscription to Newsmax.

JPS: Did that *list* find its way to you?

Just looked. Thanks. Responded.


Hmmmm. email must be running s...l...o...w

Yeah, that's what you get with free...

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:52:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


Your search engine must be broken. I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...

http://news.google.com/news?oe=UTF-8...york+times+cru
+emails&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn

That link should bring them up. I apologize. I don't know where you get
your news, but, as I use Google predominately, I'm just happy I won't
have to see all those Fox links anymore. ;-)

Just joking. I only heard about the Bing/News Corp. deal today.

On Nov 24, 2:19*pm, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:52:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
Your search engine must be broken. *I had no trouble finding at least
three articles in which the Times used, and discussed the emails and
their contents. *You should probably switch to Bing now, as it will
shortly be the only search engine that will link to your favorite news
source, Fox.

Show me quotes of those e-mails... I can't seem to find them, only side
crap. But of course, military secrets and information gathering methods
are well documented. And I thought you were beyond the Harry tactic of
suggesting what and where I get my news, seems I must have touched a
nerve here, do you get yours from the New York Lies and Saturday Night
live? Just asking, not accusing...

http://news.google.com/news?oe=UTF-8...york+times+cru
+emails&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn

That link should bring them up. *I apologize. *I don't know where you get
your news, but, as I use Google predominately, I'm just happy I won't
have to see all those Fox links anymore. ;-)

Just joking. I only heard about the Bing/News Corp. deal today.

I see a lot of side reporting, but still none of the direct quotes of
bodily harm, coverups, and other suspicious activity that these
letters show. The New York Lies said directly the other day they would
not post quotes because "they *may have* been aquired illegally, and
they were not meant for public view". At the same time they had no
problem posting military secrets, plans, and a "manual" on how AlQueda
information was aquired so the enemy could prepare for it... Today
they posted more quotes from documents never meant for public
consumption, of course those quotes made the previousl administration
look bad... It's a pattern of selective reporting that has plagued the
Times for over a decade...