How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:20:43 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:14:18 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:55:12 -0800, jps wrote:

relegated to page 8

So, your side hasn't much credibility (or any at all) and no standing
to talk to me about civility nor patriotism.

If I offer you civility, consider it a gift.

The only thing you have to offer, or care to offer, is the death of
reason. You are far too removed from it to esteem its worth.

You're wrong. I have nothing to offer you but disdain.


You are offering intangibles? You are offending enmity? You design
phantom enemies to justify grievance. You have no genuine ambition
for civility. The truth of that is ensconced in every note you write.

You just can't hear the greivance, nor could you when the offense was
being committed. You are no arbiter of civility or truth, despite
your assumption of such.

But I'll give you one thing. You certainly share Ms. Prejean's
ability to go solo and I bet you'd best her.

Even in Mode Pugulist, your insults lack panache.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:40:22 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:20:43 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:14:18 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:55:12 -0800, jps wrote:

relegated to page 8

So, your side hasn't much credibility (or any at all) and no standing
to talk to me about civility nor patriotism.

If I offer you civility, consider it a gift.

The only thing you have to offer, or care to offer, is the death of
reason. You are far too removed from it to esteem its worth.

You're wrong. I have nothing to offer you but disdain.


You are offering intangibles? You are offending enmity? You design
phantom enemies to justify grievance. You have no genuine ambition
for civility. The truth of that is ensconced in every note you write.

You just can't hear the greivance, nor could you when the offense was
being committed. You are no arbiter of civility or truth, despite
your assumption of such.

But I'll give you one thing. You certainly share Ms. Prejean's
ability to go solo and I bet you'd best her.

Even in Mode Pugulist, your insults lack panache.

My spellchecker lied to me. "Pugulist" is actually "Pugilist.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:27:15 -0800, jps wrote:

snipped ditheringly

How perceptive of you. Are you among those who condoned and sat idlly
as the murder took place? Were you in the rooting section when Bush
and Cheney decided to send our fellow citizens and tax dollars to Iraq
for dubious reasons? You weren't dithering, were you?

What were the reasons for "sending our fellow citizens and tax dollars
to Iraq"?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:40:22 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:20:43 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:14:18 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:55:12 -0800, jps wrote:

relegated to page 8

So, your side hasn't much credibility (or any at all) and no standing
to talk to me about civility nor patriotism.

If I offer you civility, consider it a gift.

The only thing you have to offer, or care to offer, is the death of
reason. You are far too removed from it to esteem its worth.

You're wrong. I have nothing to offer you but disdain.


You are offering intangibles? You are offending enmity? You design
phantom enemies to justify grievance. You have no genuine ambition
for civility. The truth of that is ensconced in every note you write.

You just can't hear the greivance, nor could you when the offense was
being committed. You are no arbiter of civility or truth, despite
your assumption of such.

But I'll give you one thing. You certainly share Ms. Prejean's
ability to go solo and I bet you'd best her.

Even in Mode Pugulist, your insults lack panache.

I'm not aiming for panache. That's you and Ms. Prejean's cup of tea.

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:22:45 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:38:10 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:


the Bromance and Lesbian Bodice Rippers.


??

Sorry, Tom. I had to do a double-take on that one. :)

He's a homophobe. You too?

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:45:40 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:27:15 -0800, jps wrote:

snipped ditheringly

How perceptive of you. Are you among those who condoned and sat idlly
as the murder took place? Were you in the rooting section when Bush
and Cheney decided to send our fellow citizens and tax dollars to Iraq
for dubious reasons? You weren't dithering, were you?

What were the reasons for "sending our fellow citizens and tax dollars
to Iraq"?

Sorry, I asked you the questions first. You answer mine, I'll answer
yours. That's how it works in civil, reasoned exchanges.

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:47:14 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:22:45 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:38:10 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:


the Bromance and Lesbian Bodice Rippers.


??

Sorry, Tom. I had to do a double-take on that one. :)

He's a homophobe. You too?

Designing phantoms...

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:50:58 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:45:40 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:27:15 -0800, jps wrote:

snipped ditheringly

How perceptive of you. Are you among those who condoned and sat idlly
as the murder took place? Were you in the rooting section when Bush
and Cheney decided to send our fellow citizens and tax dollars to Iraq
for dubious reasons? You weren't dithering, were you?

What were the reasons for "sending our fellow citizens and tax dollars
to Iraq"?

Sorry, I asked you the questions first. You answer mine, I'll answer
yours. That's how it works in civil, reasoned exchanges.

A reasoned exchange wouldn't be one that begs the question. There is
no rational answer for a logical fallacy other than to correct the
fallacy. And I doubt, considering your history, that you would accept
correction.

So I'll repeat a question that doesn't strive for fallacy;

What were the reasons for "sending our fellow citizens and tax dollars
to Iraq"?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:02:27 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:50:58 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:45:40 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:27:15 -0800, jps wrote:

snipped ditheringly

How perceptive of you. Are you among those who condoned and sat idlly
as the murder took place? Were you in the rooting section when Bush
and Cheney decided to send our fellow citizens and tax dollars to Iraq
for dubious reasons? You weren't dithering, were you?

What were the reasons for "sending our fellow citizens and tax dollars
to Iraq"?

Sorry, I asked you the questions first. You answer mine, I'll answer
yours. That's how it works in civil, reasoned exchanges.

A reasoned exchange wouldn't be one that begs the question. There is
no rational answer for a logical fallacy other than to correct the
fallacy. And I doubt, considering your history, that you would accept
correction.

So I'll repeat a question that doesn't strive for fallacy;

What were the reasons for "sending our fellow citizens and tax dollars
to Iraq"?

G'nite.

How about that Hope and Change...
 

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:51:11 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:47:14 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:22:45 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:38:10 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:


the Bromance and Lesbian Bodice Rippers.


??

Sorry, Tom. I had to do a double-take on that one. :)

He's a homophobe. You too?

Designing phantoms...

Uh, I didn't call out the fact that Bromances and Lesbian Bodice
Rippers are penned in Seattle. That he assumes that the whiteness of
my area or that writers exist in the city has any relevance to my
state of mind is ludicrous.

If he projects that those environmental attributes affect my thinking,
he obviously thinks it'd affect his. It's quite clear he's not strong
enough to resist such influences. Therefore, he must be a homophobe.

Sweet dreams Mr. Insurance Salesman.