On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:26:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:53:45 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Oct 22, 1:23 pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:43:22 -0700, jps wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:17:57 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:50:53 -0700, Jim wrote:

Loogypicker wrote:
On Oct 21, 6:46 am, John H. wrote:
Where has 'Bama been? Perhaps he should spend less time trying
to
be a
television star and more time paying attention to the
happenings
right
here. He's had his head up his butt.

I didn't know Obama worked for the pharmacutical company that
manufactures the vaccine.

Never ceases to amaze me what an ignorant assholes those are who
look
for any argument to hang a negative on Obama.

Can't you guys see this isn't going to get us anywhere? No, I
guess
they can't. Sad.

I'd never know about John H's postings if people didn't respond to
them,
I filtered him out a long time ago as he never had anything to
contribute.

Smart man.

Ya know Johnny...this kind of stuff is exactly what I'm talking
about.
Why do you feel the need to constantly badmouth your president?
Isn't
your
govt pension cheque big enough?
I'm sure any number of your fellow Americans would love to have it.

Redistributing wealth to malcontents doesn't make much sense to me
either. Probably better off in the hands of people who find it
valuable and appreciate it.

Volunteerism is gaining steam in the US but I don't expect Herring
will be volunteering his hand out from the gov't.

Given the actions taken by the administration against those who don't
bow down to its desires, I would not be a bit surprised to see them
coming after the pensions of government retirees who disagree with
them.

Would you be surprised?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you talking about the alleged "hit list" the Obama administration
is accused of having? Funny thing, that list. Only the Republicans say
that it exists, but yet can't provide one single shred of evidence to
prove of such.

Here Loogy, this is the type behavior to which I was referring.

"Political intimidation has always been part of the current Congress's
health-care strategy: "If you're not at the table, you're on the menu"
is tattooed on every lobbyist and industry rep in Washington. But Max
Baucus's latest bullying tactics are hard to believe by even these
standards, as the Senate Finance Chairman has sicced federal
regulators on the insurer Humana Inc. for daring to criticize one part
of his health bill."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...839672342.html

This has probably not made it to the major media, but you can see why
I might be concerned about my government check.

And, anyone recieving Social Security might be concerned also.


I can think of a lot of things to call Baucus, but a bully isn't one of
them.

I think you should probably not try to defend the insurance companies too
much. Just my opinion.

I'm defending no one. I'm displaying the behavior of our government.
Of course, it's not made the 'major media'.


You called Baucus a bully. I'm not sure how that's possible, given that the
bill he pushed through the committee was a huge handout to the ins.
companies. But it wasn't enough for them, so they went on the attack. I'm
glad you're not defending them.

*I* called Baucus nothing. *I* am not the Wall Street Journal. I am
just me.

lol