On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:13 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:59:10 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 14, 4:02 pm, Tosk wrote:
Headline, Troy NY...

After the recent suspension of a eagle scout for having a penknife,
locked in his car, locked in a survival kit for 20 days this is the only
conclusion one can come to. You guys are a bunch of morons with personal
agendas which obviously get in the way of education. Quick, I hear a
lunch lady was seen with a straw in her hands, what if she made a
spitball from a napkin? I hope you will find her and send her directly
to jail... Idiots. Really though, it's probably more of a statement from
an ignorant vice principal who hates the fact that the kid is a good
solid American who wants to go to West Point.

Follow-up: Apparently West Point has contacted him personally and told
him these idiots prejudice and personal agenda won't hurt his wishes to
serve his country.. Morons, they should all be voted out...

I hope they get that lunch lady before she goes off and picks up a
spork...


of course, the red states would never do something like this...for
example, in texas you're allowed to own as many guns as you want

but women are not allowed to buy the little trojan 'personal
stimulator' because that offends the morals of texas politicians.

so guns are unregulated

dildoes are banned.

red state sanity, i suppose

Red states.

You mean the ones with the worst health care and school systems?


The fix is... Pass a law that allows dildos.

Make contraception mandatory.

I'm pretty sure they also have the highest incidence of teen mothers.

I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

On 10/15/09 7:36 AM, thunder wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?


Herring seems to be getting increasingly bizarre as his brain ossifies.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed father
won't support the child, absolutely!

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.
I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?
If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

That's a reasonable idea.

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.


--
Nom=de=Plume

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:27 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or
maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?

If the unwed mother identifies the unwed father, and the unwed father
won't support the child, absolutely!


What about if she was gang raped? Do all of them get to be castrated?

Give them the choice - Death penalty or castration with lots of years
behind bars. I'm not in favor of gang rape either.


But, you support the senators who voted against the bill? Seems like you do,
but please feel free to distance yourself from them.

If you are referring to the senators and the bill you mentioned in
another post, go look at my response to that post.

'Assuming' can be quite stupid at times.

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:22:18 -0400, KotP-A wrote:


I think Washington DC gets that honor. Or is it unwed mothers? Or maybe
teen-unwed mothers.

Mandatory sterilization after the first abortion would be a good idea.

I'm sure you are referring to both parties involved. So, do you think
you can the 83% male Congress to vote for mandatory castration?


I'd be happy to sign a petition for that! lol

--
Nom=de=Plume