On Sep 28, 11:32*am, "RD (The Sandman)" rdsandman(spamlock)
@comcast.net wrote:
wf3h wrote :



no, they're no. since manufacturing has disappeared in the US and
virtually none of it was unionized, it's obvious unions had zip to do
with it. *you admit IBM is *unionized...and still in the US, while the
non unionized plants are gone

That was a company choice....and not a good one.

oh. i see how this works. you claim unions destroy business. proof of
that is

1. non unionized plants are closed
2. unionized plants are still in production but you think they
shouldn't be because that disproves your view

gee. an ironclad argument


and that, to you, proves non unionized plants protect jobs? if that's
the case, where are the jobs?

If you were half as familiar with IBM as you insinuate, you would know
what a loss that was.

and if you knew logic, you'd see how ridiculous your position is


--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

"Fear is the foundation of most governments."

President John Adams- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -