wf3h wrote:
On Sep 23, 1:03 pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:

Feel free to prove where I have "obsessed" about anything at all.
you're paranoid about obama.
No, he is not "paranoid"; that's another word that idiot uneducated
young people, primarily leftists, have drained of meaning.

IOW any term that displeases you has been 'drained of meaning'.

the phrase 'drained of meaning' has, itself, become a victim under the
linguistic onslaught of the flatline far right...


you hate him
Not in evidence...

you mean other than attributing every evil in history, including
hangnails, to the darkie president?

and accuse him of doing
things that his predecessor had actually done.
FALSE. Bush didn't push for national health care.

ROFLMAO!! of COURSE he didn't! like the rest of his policies, health
care is in the toilet. but it made his friends rich! res ipsa
loquitur!

Bush didn't
nationalize GM.

actually he did.

Actually he didn't. The nationalization happened as part of the GM
bankruptcy, which happened entirely under Obama. Obama also fired the
chairman of the company, making a mockery of his claim that the
government wasn't going to be running GM.

Your partisanship blinds you totally to the facts.


Bush didn't cancel missile defense for Europe.

of COURSE he didn't!

RIght.


Bush didn't...****, Bush didn't do nearly anything that Obama is doing in
pursuit of a leftist agenda.

bush destroyed the economy.

He didn't. The economy isn't destroyed, and you don't know ****-all
about economics, you goddamned ****ing ****-4-braincell *do-nothing* punk.

On Sep 23, 1:37*pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:43 pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:
2. since you ignore the rich white boy
No, I didn't.

ah. so your argument is as follows:

No. *Any time any leftist writes something like "So what you're
saying..." or "So your argument is...", what follows is *NEVER* an
accurate restatement of the opponent's position - never.

says the guy who cuts and pastes because he can't read or understand
an argument that rush hasn't dissected for him


1 you clip out what i said

It's almost entirely bull****. *I leave in just the bull**** I want to
identify as bull**** and refute.

as i said, anytime you correct a right winger, he can't respond so
just utters the mantra 'bull****'.



2. you merely say that what you say is true

No, what I say is true, period.

you guys trashed the economy.

No. *First, I wasn't in government. *Second, I didn't vote for Bush.
Third, Bush didn't trash the economy.\\

i know you think obama did....newflash, genius; obama wasn't
president last year when the economy tanked

On Sep 23, 1:42*pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:


says the guy who thinks obama's been president for 8 years

No, he doesn't. *You just can't stop lying, can you? *You're a
pathological liar.- Hide quoted text -


if this were true, i'd have a radio show and be the darling of the far
right

wf3h wrote:
On Sep 23, 1:37 pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:43 pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:
2. since you ignore the rich white boy
No, I didn't.
ah. so your argument is as follows:
No. Any time any leftist writes something like "So what you're
saying..." or "So your argument is...", what follows is *NEVER* an
accurate restatement of the opponent's position - never.

says the guy who cuts and pastes because he can't read or understand
an argument that rush hasn't dissected for him

1 you clip out what i said
It's almost entirely bull****. I leave in just the bull**** I want to
identify as bull**** and refute.

as i said,

You said bull**** - again.


2. you merely say that what you say is true
No, what I say is true, period.

you guys trashed the economy.
No. First, I wasn't in government. Second, I didn't vote for Bush.
Third, Bush didn't trash the economy.\\

i know you think obama did.

No, I don't think that, either. The economy has not been "trashed". It
is in a major recession caused by bad federal policy, mainly around
mortgage lending. CRA under Carter, and the destruction of mortgage
lending standards begun under Clinton and continued by Bush, are what
put us into a recession.

Boy, you sure do get a lot of things wrong.

wf3h wrote:
On Sep 23, 1:42 pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:

says the guy who thinks obama's been president for 8 years
No, he doesn't. You just can't stop lying, can you? You're a
pathological liar.- Hide quoted text -


if this were true,

It is true.

On Sep 23, 1:34*pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:24 pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:
now let me see...it's 'causality' that obama is a 'socialist' and
therefore everything he does is wrong
No, no one has said that's "causality".

except you, of course,

Except no one.

says the guy who thinks obama has moved the US capital to havana.


but it's NOT causality when the policies that bush followed destroyed
our economy and trashed the middle class
You can't show that any of his policies did any of that. **THAT'S* the
lack of causality, dumb ****.

really? cutting capital gains and causing the wall street

Cutting capital gains tax caused no debacle

sure did. it increased the deficit.


# the US isn't rich. we're a debtor nation
Being in debt doesn't mean one isn't rich.

ROFLMAO!!! so to you the richest guy in the world is one who's
bankrupt??!!!

Being in debt does not mean bankruptcy.

fine. you go tell me how we're going to pay the bills we racked up.
guess what the definition of bankruptcy is?


* * * * That's why we have so many people who want to migrate here, legally

uh...no. over 100,000 indians and chinese are headed back to their
respective countries due to our collapsing economy.
That's probably false. *I'm certainly not going to tend to believe it
without some documentation of it. *I think you made that up.

really?

Until you posted something, yes.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...09/09/americas...

"What was a trickle has become a flood," says Duke University's Vivek
Wadhwa, who studies reverse immigration. Wadhwa projects that in the
next five years, 100,000 immigrants will go back to India and 100,000
to China, countries that have had rapid economic growth.

That is a *projection*, you cocksucker, and it's over five years

ah. so now you admit i was right and you're backpedaling after having
said it wasn't true.

figures...that's what right wingers do

.. *It
may or may not come to pass. *In any event, those workers returning to
their home countries is not necessarily an indication that there's
anything "wrong" with the US economy

i know. to right wingers, as long as the rich are doing well, all is
well. unemployment at 10%? who cares, rush is doing OK so everything's
fine. screw the middle class

to a right winger, this economy is a model of success. the middle
class is done, the rich own everything and there's no hope for any
middle class income growth at all

it doesn't get better than this!

On Sep 23, 8:31*pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 23, 1:37 pm, Wilson Woods wrote:
wf3h wrote:

says the guy who cuts and pastes because he can't read or understand
an argument that rush hasn't dissected for him

1 you clip out what i said
It's almost entirely bull****. *I leave in just the bull**** I want to
identify as bull**** and refute.

as i said,

You said bull**** - again.

glad to see you're up to 2 syllable words.


you guys trashed the economy.
No. *First, I wasn't in government. *Second, I didn't vote for Bush.
Third, Bush didn't trash the economy.\\

i know *you think obama did.

No, I don't think that, either. *The economy has not been "trashed". *It
is in a major recession caused by bad federal policy, mainly around
mortgage lending.

uh...no. mortgage lending had little to do with it. colllateralized
debt obligantions, which ballooned from $920B to SIXTY TWO TRILLION
dollars under free market fundamentalism was responsible

*CRA under Carter, and the destruction of mortgage
lending standards begun under Clinton and continued by Bush, are what
put us into a recession.

hey genius...the largest mortgage lender to go bankrupt was
countrywide. and it wasn't covered under the CRA.

guess rush forgot to tell you that.


Boy, you sure do get a lot of things wrong.-

really? then how is it that you didn't even know that your whole
argument about the CRA was

wrong?

oh. you're right wing so logic is irrelevant

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 23, 12:46 pm, "SaPeIsMa" wrote:


This guy has a fixation about everything that is against Obambi being
because he's black
There is no reasoning with the mentally ill.

#
# says the guy who thinks obama's been president for 8 years and that's
# why the country is wrecked.

The only one spouting stupid and racist remarks here is you
The above is proof of it.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:46:48 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:13:22 -0700, Wilson Woods
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:54:46 -0700 (PDT), Toots Sweet
wrote:

I would suggest to you that Carter & Clinton did, and Obama will do,
more damage to American interests domestically and abroad than GWB
EVER did during his eight years in office.

By all means, don't let the facts or history cloud your fantasies.

By any objective measure, the Republicans have done more to undercut
and destroy the country in the last 30 years than Democrats will do
over the next 100.

Hey, that game looks like fun! Let *me* try it, huh?

By any objective measure, Obama will do more to set back the human
condition just during his morning dump tomorrow than all Republicans,
Conservatives, Tories, Royalists, Christian Democrats and other
center-right parties have done in recorded history.

Wow, that /was/ fun!

Difference is, I can provide the objective measure.

You, not so much.

Go ahead, provide it.

Do your own homework. I don't have time to educate idiots.

So you admit that you can't provide it
Obviously, you're the uneducated idiot
Thank you for proving it.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:45:38 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"
wrote:


"Wilson Woods" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:54:46 -0700 (PDT), Toots Sweet
wrote:

I would suggest to you that Carter & Clinton did, and Obama will do,
more damage to American interests domestically and abroad than GWB
EVER did during his eight years in office.

By all means, don't let the facts or history cloud your fantasies.

By any objective measure, the Republicans have done more to undercut
and destroy the country in the last 30 years than Democrats will do
over the next 100.

Hey, that game looks like fun! Let *me* try it, huh?

By any objective measure, Obama will do more to set back the human
condition just during his morning dump tomorrow than all Republicans,
Conservatives, Tories, Royalists, Christian Democrats and other
center-right parties have done in recorded history.

Wow, that /was/ fun!

Here's another one.
By any objective measure, socialists have caused more death and misery in
the last 100 years than anyone else has in previous times.
(See www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM "

And I suppose you're counting Hitler as a socialist, you silly dweeb.

Hitler declared himself to be a socialist.
And take a hairy-assed wild guess at what "Z" in the acronym NAZI stood for.
"Socialist" in German.

But thank you, for once again demonstrating that you REALLY are an ignorant
idiot.