| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#91
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On Sep 22, 10:49*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message news 
On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? *That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. *And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have.. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? *BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? |
|
#92
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news
On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#93
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On Sep 23, 1:11*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. |
|
#94
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news
On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or government job. Steve ;-) |
|
#95
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On Sep 23, 10:43*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Definition of "LOSER": *Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or government job. Steve ;-) President Bush had the highest government job in the land, so by your definition, he is brilliant!! Jack ;-) |
|
#96
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#97
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"SteveB" wrote in message
... "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news
On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or government job. Steve ;-) LOL - Does it count if I *had* a union job? I ran a forklift a long time ago and had to join. Yes, it's not a typical female job. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#98
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 23, 10:43 am, "SteveB" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Definition of "LOSER": Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or government job. Steve ;-) President Bush had the highest government job in the land, so by your definition, he is brilliant!! Jack ;-) I never thought (well, mostly) that GWB was stupid. I thought he was an &*shole, but not stupid. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#99
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
On Sep 23, 1:25*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message .... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate. -- Nom=de=Plume There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being intentionally bitchy? |
|
#100
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Humor! Obama's low pass over Texas
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 23, 1:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 23, 1:11 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message news On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office, you have serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies. ?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to previous presidents, he seems pretty good to me. Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear the led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have. Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the same as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on the beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental imagery) Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that makes you feel better. With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine by yourself. I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO one voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or Obama) You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a political party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the deficiencies. Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You have LOADS of company. You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH?????? Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser. Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names? And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name? Why would consider re-reading all his previous posts, since it would be obvious what I'm talking about. What would you call him? -- Nom=de=Plume Correct. Thank you, but calling him a loser more than once isn't appropriate. -- Nom=de=Plume There's that lack of reading comprehension again. Or are you being intentionally bitchy? The latter of course. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New Pass | General | |||
| Active Pass | Tall Ship Photos | |||
| HOW DO I BY PASS THE IGNITION KEY ? | General | |||
| OT - Another prediction comes to pass! | General | |||
| OT--Here's one bill that will never pass | General | |||
![Jack[_3_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
