A while ago I posted this:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...4010490?&hl=en
Check the P.S.

And now this:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/...oll/index.html

Mark Browne

wrote in message

A while ago I posted this:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...4010490?&hl=en
Check the P.S.

And now this:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/...oll/index.html

Mark Browne

Prediction comes true?? LOL

All that poll demonstrates is that it is remarkably easy to find 1027 adult
Americans who have no functional thought process. Comparing these two
presidencies is like saying grapefruit tastes better than fried clams.

Prediction comes true?? LOL

All that poll demonstrates is that it is remarkably easy to find 1027 adult
Americans who have no functional thought process. Comparing these two
presidencies is like saying grapefruit tastes better than fried clams.


No, the polls shows that many of the many dysfunctional Americans who
voted this poor excuse for a human in are starting to wake up and
realize what a bufoon they put in office. Sorry if you can't face the
reality that America is finally waking up and seeing Bush for the
jackoff he is. You'll just deny it and blame the polls for being all
wrong. Very functional thinking on your part....lol...

"John Chaplain" wrote in message
...



Prediction comes true?? LOL

All that poll demonstrates is that it is remarkably easy to find 1027
adult
Americans who have no functional thought process. Comparing these two
presidencies is like saying grapefruit tastes better than fried clams.


No, the polls shows that many of the many snip Americans who
voted this poor excuse for a human in are starting to wake up and
realize what a bufoon they put in office. Sorry if you can't face the
reality that America is finally waking up and seeing Bush for the
jackoff he is. You'll just deny it and blame the polls for being all
wrong. Very functional thinking on your part....lol...



I would not call him a buffoon or a jackoff. I do think, however, that he
is not listening to what Americans want action on. Nor will I post a
personal attack on you like you did to John G.

Having said that..........if this was his first term in office I would not
vote for him again.

If the Bush and the republicans don't turn this around (immigration, the war
in Iraq), and barring Hillary being the Dems choice, a democrat will be
sitting in the oval office next term. ;-)

"John Chaplain" wrote in message

No, the polls shows that many of the many dysfunctional Americans who
voted this poor excuse for a human in are starting to wake up and
realize what a bufoon they put in office. Sorry if you can't face the
reality that America is finally waking up and seeing Bush for the
jackoff he is. You'll just deny it and blame the polls for being all
wrong. Very functional thinking on your part....lol...

Most of us stopped using personal insult as a standard debating tool
somewhere around the age of 12.

My post made no comment one way or the other regarding the efficacy of the
GWB or Clinton administrations. The sole point was that it is pontless or
misleading to ask simplistic poll questions when the two administrations
operated in such markedly different economic and foreign policy contexts.
Hence, grapefruit or fried clams?

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"John Chaplain" wrote in message

No, the polls shows that many of the many dysfunctional Americans who
voted this poor excuse for a human in are starting to wake up and
realize what a bufoon they put in office. Sorry if you can't face the
reality that America is finally waking up and seeing Bush for the
jackoff he is. You'll just deny it and blame the polls for being all
wrong. Very functional thinking on your part....lol...

Most of us stopped using personal insult as a standard debating tool
somewhere around the age of 12.

Except for harry, don, kevin, etc etc.


My post made no comment one way or the other regarding the efficacy of
the
GWB or Clinton administrations. The sole point was that it is pontless
or
misleading to ask simplistic poll questions when the two administrations
operated in such markedly different economic and foreign policy
contexts.
Hence, grapefruit or fried clams?

There are plenty of conservatives (including me) that are unhappy with the
way the present administration is heading. That does not mean that I will
pull the lever for the socialist, i.e. democratic party.

I did not mean to launch a personal atrtack on you, sorry you took it
that way.
You said that people responding to the survey were dysfunctional, I
was just pointing out that perhaps your thinking on the issues is not
quite as functional as you might like to think, (which I admit is sort
of an insult,) but meant more in a debating rather than derogatory
sense since it was you who used the term "dysfunctional Americans" in
the first place.
Peace,
John C.


On Sat, 13 May 2006 20:24:31 -0400, "John Gaquin"
wrote:


"John Chaplain" wrote in message

No, the polls shows that many of the many dysfunctional Americans who
voted this poor excuse for a human in are starting to wake up and
realize what a bufoon they put in office. Sorry if you can't face the
reality that America is finally waking up and seeing Bush for the
jackoff he is. You'll just deny it and blame the polls for being all
wrong. Very functional thinking on your part....lol...

Most of us stopped using personal insult as a standard debating tool
somewhere around the age of 12.

My post made no comment one way or the other regarding the efficacy of the
GWB or Clinton administrations. The sole point was that it is pontless or
misleading to ask simplistic poll questions when the two administrations
operated in such markedly different economic and foreign policy contexts.
Hence, grapefruit or fried clams?

"John Chaplain" wrote in message

I did not mean to launch a personal atrtack on you, sorry you took it
that way.
OK, no harm done.

You said that people responding to the survey were dysfunctional.....

......since it was you who used the term "dysfunctional Americans" in
the first place.

Well, not quite accurate. The term I used was "...no functional thought
process...". The point is that when asked that type of simplistic polling
question, --"who did a better job, Clinton or Bush?"--, the first response
of any thinking person ought to be "Trick question!!" They operated in two
different worlds.

"John Chaplain" wrote in message
...



Prediction comes true?? LOL

All that poll demonstrates is that it is remarkably easy to find 1027
adult
Americans who have no functional thought process. Comparing these two
presidencies is like saying grapefruit tastes better than fried clams.


No, the polls shows that many of the many dysfunctional Americans who
voted this poor excuse for a human in are starting to wake up and
realize what a bufoon they put in office. Sorry if you can't face the
reality that America is finally waking up and seeing Bush for the
jackoff he is. You'll just deny it and blame the polls for being all
wrong. Very functional thinking on your part....lol...

Even with Bush's approval at 31% (according to Gallup), Bush has
approximately 68% approval among Republicans, and only 4% among Democrats.
There is a 64 point spread between Republican support and Democrat support
of this President...the widest gap ever.

So you guys see in the polls what you want to see, and we see what we want
to see. But November will show who is right once again. ;-)



From Gallup:
"Bush's 68% rating among Republicans is better than Carter's rating among
Democrats (34%), the elder Bush's rating among Republicans (57%), and
Clinton's rating among Democrats (63%), at each president's low point. It is
roughly the same as the 69% that Reagan received among Republicans at his
low point.

Bush has the widest gap between Republicans' and Democrats' approval ratings
of any of the five presidents at the low points of their administration.
There is a 64-point gap between Republicans' and Democrats' ratings of Bush
right now. This compares with a 50-point partisan gap for Reagan, a 45-point
gap for Clinton, a 45-point gap for the elder Bush, and a 15-point gap for
Carter."



http://poll.gallup.com/content/?ci=22708

wrote:
A while ago I posted this:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...4010490?&hl=en
Check the P.S.

And now this:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/...oll/index.html

Mark Browne

I know the "b" and the "V" are right next to each other on your
keyboard, but if you can spell at all you shouldn't be confused between
rec.Boats (where your OT crap appeared) and rec.Votes (where you must
have intended to stir up trouble).

Where do you normally go for political arguments? Do you suppose it
would make a lot of sense if folks from this group appeared there to
discuss deadrise, navigation, or marine electronics?