On Sep 23, 10:43*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 22, 10:49 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Steve" wrote in message

news

On 22-Sep-2009, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

If you condone any of the crap of the people you've put in office,
you
have
serious moral, ethical and intellectual deficiencies.

?? Please tell us about your deep-seated fear of Obama. Compared to
previous
presidents, he seems pretty good to me.

Your statement confirms my analysis. Fear Obama?? That's idiocy. I fear
the
led-by-the-nose disciples that voted for him. And for Bush. And for
Clinton. Obama would make a great class president, like Bush would have.
Bush and Obama's legacy is that they make CLINTON look good. That's the
same
as being stranded for years on an island and Rosie O'Donald washes up on
the
beach - then, she'd look good too. (sorry about the horrid mental
imagery)

Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better.

With YOUR voluntary input, I don't need to insult you. You're doing fine
by
yourself.

I didn't put Bush in office, and never voted for him. (The reality is NO
one
voted for Bush, or the losers that ran against him. Or for Mr. Magoo or
Obama)

You have confirmed that your you have a sycophant-affection for a
political
party, as about 25% of "Americans" do. That again confirms the
deficiencies.
Mindless affection for a "party" establishes dysfunctional status. You
have
LOADS of company.

You never answered - government "employee" or union member? BOTH??????

Neither. Feel free to call me some more names. What a loser.

Why would you consider "government employee" and "union member" names?

And isn't calling someone a "loser" calling a name?

Definition of "LOSER": *Anyone who is not smart enough to get a union or
government job.

Steve ;-)

President Bush had the highest government job in the land, so by your
definition, he is brilliant!!

Jack ;-)