On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:08:40 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:13:23 -0500, Vic Smith wrote:


Without a "public option" there will be no progress with health care
reform until things really go to hell in a handbasket. In the meantime
the only winners will be the insurance companies and health care
companies.
Obama has a big speech next week.
If he doesn't demand a public option he loses. Be interesting to see if
his guts match the Dem numbers in Congress. That's my opinion.
I don't see much guts in the Dem party. They should be kicking ass and
telling the Reps to go get ****ed, including the town hall whiners
sucking Medicare tit and wanting all that milk just for themselves.
Elections count. Supposed to anyway.

Hear, hear. I agree completely. In many ways, Obama's administration is
riding on the outcome of health care reform. The Democrats have the
numbers. Obama needs to quit playing softball. I'd feel a little more
confident is Reid was a little tougher, because someone has to get the
Democrats playing hard ball.

So, you feel that half the country should totally dictate to the other
half, a one party system if you will?

It is the duty of the citizen to subordinate himself or herself to the
lunatic fringe for the good of 'posterity' and government. If one or
two of your personal liberties are sacrificed - "big whup"!

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access