Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
So recent history has no bearing on what's happening today?

Never said that. But the history that counts starts today.

Cool! Guess that means I don't have to pay my car payment because I
didn't buy the car today?

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

John H

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
So recent history has no bearing on what's happening today?
Never said that. But the history that counts starts today.
Cool! Guess that means I don't have to pay my car payment because I
didn't buy the car today?

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--

Maybe because he is doing what HE thinks is right, as opposed to doing
what Rush thinks is right.

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:57:40 -0400, NotNow wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
So recent history has no bearing on what's happening today?
Never said that. But the history that counts starts today.
Cool! Guess that means I don't have to pay my car payment because I
didn't buy the car today?

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--

Maybe because he is doing what HE thinks is right, as opposed to doing
what Rush thinks is right.

I believe Rush thought Iraq was a good idea. I guess he and BO are
thinking alike on this issue.

As long as we all understand whose war it is now.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Sep 2, 2:32*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:


Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--


because we know bush ****ed it up so bad that we now have to clean the
mess up before we leave. i know that, to rednecks, they think liberals
want to cut and run, but that shows how little rednecks know about
anything

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Sep 2, 2:32*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:


Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--


because we know bush ****ed it up so bad that we now have to clean the
mess up before we leave. i know that, to rednecks, they think liberals
want to cut and run, but that shows how little rednecks know about
anything

Uh, uh, what mess?
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Sep 2, 3:22*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:18:37 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Sep 2, 2:32*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Yes, Obama is. One must wonder why he is still there if so many
liberals think Iraq was a bad idea.
--

because we know bush ****ed it up so bad that we now have to clean the
mess up before we leave. i know that, to rednecks, they think liberals
want to cut and run, but that shows how little rednecks know about
anything

Uh, uh, what mess?


that you don't know tells us why we're in the mess we're in

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
So recent history has no bearing on what's happening today?

Never said that. But the history that counts starts today.

Cool! Guess that means I don't have to pay my car payment because I
didn't buy the car today?

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Again, I never said anything about the past not having a bearing on
today. You just falsely accuse me of that.
Obama ran for Prez to lead the economy, I hope.
It's Obama's economy now. He's got plenty of slack cut for him.
You don't think GWB will make your car payments, do you?
Like I told Eisboch, when I lost my job because of the bad economy
during The Great Reagan Depression in 1982 - much worse than now BTW -
I didn't blame Jimmy Carter for that depression. He was gone.
Eisboch wanted to blame Carter , because he was a sap for Ronnie
Raygun.
So to make that work, he had to defend Obama with Bush's sins.
I don't play that game. There's only one decider at a time.
If things continue to get worse and you lose your job, good luck
blaming GWB. He won't make your car payments, and you'll be looking
for Obama to get you back on your feet.
Whether you or anybody else likes it or not, GWB is gone.
History. And good riddance too.

--Vic

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

NotNow wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
So recent history has no bearing on what's happening today?

Never said that. But the history that counts starts today.

Cool! Guess that means I don't have to pay my car payment because I
didn't buy the car today?

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.
Until recently we were paying a tax on our telephone whose original
purpose had long since passed. History does count.

Unfortunately there are those that would rather repeat the mistakes of
the past than learn from history. Consider the lessons from the
thirties that are being ignored. The democrats tried to spend the
country out of the depression. It took twenty years and two wars before
the country was able to extract is self from that spending spree. Yet
what is obama doing today? Adding two trillion dollars to the deficit
to get the country out of what he considers a depression. How many
years and wars will it take the US to get out of obama's fiasco?

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Sep 2, 5:32*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:15:02 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
So recent history has no bearing on what's happening today?

Never said that. *But the history that counts starts today.

Cool! Guess that means I don't have to pay my car payment because I
didn't buy the car today?

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Again, I never said anything about the past not having a bearing on
today. * You just falsely accuse me of that.
Obama ran for Prez to lead the economy, I hope.
It's Obama's economy now. *He's got plenty of slack cut for him.
You don't think GWB will make your car payments, do you?
Like I told Eisboch, when I lost my job because of the bad economy
during The Great Reagan Depression in 1982 - much worse than now BTW -

i was there too. that one was child's play compared to bush's fiasco

I didn't blame Jimmy Carter for that depression. *He was gone.
Eisboch wanted to blame Carter , because he was a sap for Ronnie
Raygun.
So to make that work, he had to defend Obama with Bush's sins.
I don't play that game. *There's only one decider at a time.
If things continue to get worse and you lose your job, good luck
blaming GWB. *He won't make your car payments, and you'll be looking
for Obama to get you back on your feet.

uh...no. what looking at history does is, hopefully, prevent you from
making the same mistake twice...like voting for a right wing president
who says 'trust the free market'.

Those pesky facts again about healthcare
 

On Sep 2, 5:45*pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
NotNow wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:44:09 -0400, NotNow wrote:
So recent history has no bearing on what's happening today?

Never said that. *But the history that counts starts today.

Cool! Guess that means I don't have to pay my car payment because I
didn't buy the car today?

Your thinking is flawed. What has happened in the past DOES have a
bearing on today. We're still spending money in Iraq, for instance.

Until recently we were paying a tax on our telephone whose original
purpose had long since passed. *History does count.

Unfortunately there are those that would rather repeat the mistakes of
the past than learn from history. *Consider the lessons from the
thirties that are being ignored. The democrats tried to spend the
country out of the depression. *It took twenty years and two wars before
the country was able to extract is self from that spending spree. *Yet
what is obama doing today? *Adding two trillion dollars to the deficit
to *get the country out of what he considers a depression. How many
years and wars will it take the US to get out of obama's fiasco?


he's implementing good economics that the republicans themselves tried
to get started last year. you don't know much about economics, do
you?