Gene wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:01:18 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

Yeah, if a republican disagrees with you he is a "reverse Harry'.

I don't think "disagreement" is the topic of conversation, at
all......

I think *incessant off-topic posting* is the point. I can agree and
disagree with both *sides.* I find the *sides* have adopted Hatfield
and McCoy mentalities.... now everything posted is perceived as a
personal attack. It is almost like posters have lost their own
identities and can only post from some perceived political position...
all too often, of late, not even rooted in facts.

Why are we posting with masks of political identity in a boating
newsgroup. This would be a healthier discussion if I said you suck
because you own a Bayliner, that what political party with which you
identify.

If you want to discuss disagreeing, let's talk about agreeing to
disagree.... and killfiling those who can't.

Harry honestly posts that he come here to stir up trouble and you
aren't going to get him to stop. Now, you have folks of a different
political persuasion doing the same thing. Folks coming here to
disagree angrily, spread hateful political crap (factual or not), use
dirty little words and phrases, etc. .....

At least Harry is honest enough to admit it.......... to
everybody.....

Harry sucks. Is that honest enough for you?

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:40:29 -0400, Jim numero uno "j i
wrote:

At least Harry is honest enough to admit it.......... to
everybody.....

Harry sucks. Is that honest enough for you?



You said it, we believe you, now let's move on.