![]() |
A fading Obama screw-up
thunder wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:41:32 -0400, BAR wrote: The Hondouran government removed its President according to the Honduran Constitution when the Honduran President tried to hold an extra Constitutional referendum. The Honduran legislature was the prosecutor, the Honduran Supreme Court was judge and the Honduran military was the de facto police force. I won't deny Zelaya overstepped his bounds, but I'll also guarantee his removal was extra-constitutional. Over the years, Honduras has had far too many coups, to encase them in their Constitution. Castro, Chavez and Obama didn't like what happened because they saw it as a puny little Central American country enforcing Constitutional law thereby preventing the chief of state from staying in office beyond his constitutional limited term in office setting a bad precedent, according to them. Their constitution explicitly states there can be no referendum to change the presidential term limit. Zelaya decided to violate the constitution. Everyone but the democrats change, they just continue chasing the same old failed ideas. |
A fading Obama screw-up
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:02:30 -0400, BAR wrote:
If the Honduran Supreme Court orders the Honduran military to put him on a plane out of the country how is that a coup d'etat? Under Article 306 of the Honduran Constitution, the Supreme Court has the right to send law enforcement to execute an arrest warrant, but it's unclear to me, as to whether the military constitutes "law enforcement". Under Article 102, no Honduran citizen can be exiled. From my seat, Zelaya should have been arrested and brought to trial. Does the Honduran Supreme Court have the authority to order the Honduran military to arrest the Honduran President? I don't know, but all parties have to follow the Constitution, or else it's called a coup. |
A fading Obama screw-up
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:11:54 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:
Their constitution explicitly states there can be no referendum to change the presidential term limit. Zelaya decided to violate the constitution. And their Constitution explicitly states, "No Honduran can be exiled". If, as I think he did, Zelaya violated the Constitution, he should have been arrested and brought to trial. All parties have to obey the Constitution, not just the President. Everyone but the democrats change, they just continue chasing the same old failed ideas. |
A fading Obama screw-up
|
A fading Obama screw-up
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... wf3h wrote: On Aug 10, 9:35 pm, Frogwatch wrote: Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and Castro lost. zalaya is a stupid ******* but obama, unlike his predecessor, believes in the rule of law. i realize that, to right wingers, the rule of law is something for other people, and power is the only law...but to some of us, constitutional principles still have meaning. To review the facts of the case, the Supreme Court of Honduras removed the sitting president for illegal activities. The Congress of Honduras appointed the new president under the Courts supervision. As with everything else, if the obamadytes disagree with it, it is trivialized or ignored. They still think there is no opposition to their national health care plan. Really.. I just watched 25 questions to Arlen Specter (sp?) and only one was supportive (even she had problems with the bill), yet the moron stood there and said something like "most Americans want this bill". What is he smoking... I just listened to an interview with Congressman Mike Pence. He has been working against the nationalization of the health care system. He said he has also saw and increase in the number of people attending his town hall meetings. He has not seen the shouting matches that have occurred in some of these town hall meetings. Could it be he is listening to his constituents, working to correct their concerns, and not telling them they are unpatriotic for come to his meetings to express their opinions? |
A fading Obama screw-up
JustWait wrote:
In article 68f863ff-e852-47ef-aaaa- , says... On Aug 10, 9:35 pm, Frogwatch wrote: Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and Castro lost. zalaya is a stupid ******* but obama, unlike his predecessor, believes in the rule of law. i realize that, to right wingers, the rule of law is something for other people, and power is the only law...but to some of us, constitutional principles still have meaning. Are we talking about the same President.. This one wants to: remove the secret ballot: Bull**** from Rush. stop free speech on the airwaves Bull**** and not true. personally attacks dissenters over the airwaves wants to take over as many industries as possible Sounds about like every conservative on the "airwaves". ... You forgot the lie about the Obama administration wanting to have a panel to figure out when an old person should be taken off of meds. |
A fading Obama screw-up
|
A fading Obama screw-up
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... wf3h wrote: On Aug 10, 9:35 pm, Frogwatch wrote: Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. The Obama admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster had to back down. Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and Castro lost. zalaya is a stupid ******* but obama, unlike his predecessor, believes in the rule of law. i realize that, to right wingers, the rule of law is something for other people, and power is the only law...but to some of us, constitutional principles still have meaning. To review the facts of the case, the Supreme Court of Honduras removed the sitting president for illegal activities. The Congress of Honduras appointed the new president under the Courts supervision. As with everything else, if the obamadytes disagree with it, it is trivialized or ignored. They still think there is no opposition to their national health care plan. Really.. I just watched 25 questions to Arlen Specter (sp?) and only one was supportive (even she had problems with the bill), yet the moron stood there and said something like "most Americans want this bill". What is he smoking... Why would he have to be smoking something, Scotty? Here, take a look: http://www.gallup.com/poll/121664/ma...this-year.aspx |
A fading Obama screw-up
On Aug 11, 11:16*am, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... wf3h wrote: On Aug 10, 9:35 pm, Frogwatch wrote: Obama's support of legally replaced Honduras Chavez wanna-be Zalaya failed and the thug won't be back in power any time soon. *The Obama admin realizing they had no basis for complaining about Zelayas ouster had to back down. *Constitutional law won and Obama and Chavez and Castro lost. zalaya is a stupid ******* but obama, unlike his predecessor, believes in the rule of law. i realize that, to right wingers, the rule of law is something for other people, and power is the only law...but to some of us, constitutional principles still have meaning. To review the facts of the case, the Supreme Court of Honduras removed the sitting president for illegal activities. *The Congress of Honduras appointed the new president under the Courts supervision. As with everything else, if the obamadytes disagree with it, it is trivialized or ignored. *They still think there is no opposition to their national health care plan. Really.. I just watched 25 questions to Arlen Specter (sp?) and only one was supportive (even she had problems with the bill), yet the moron stood there and said something like "most Americans want this bill". What is he smoking... Why would he have to be smoking something, Scotty? Here, take a look: http://www.gallup.com/poll/121664/ma...hcare-reform-t... I have read the Honduran constitution and it specifically required the military to act to remove the Pres, not the police. Zelaya was not exiled, he was simply told that if he came back he would be arrested for his illegal actions. He can go back whenever he wants but he will be arrested as REQUIRED by the constitution. The reality is that Obama DOES NOT support constitutional law. Zelaya attempted to mount a coup and got caught. Thunder sis simply wrong and does not even try to find out the real situation. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com