Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Just John II wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote: Just John II wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: J. Leo wrote: "But a growing number of policy makers say that the world?s rising temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to the national interest. If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to address." One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA? And, suppose no one of consequence follows. Full article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are no green house gases from a nuclear power plant. Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global warming I will accept it for what it is, politics. I agree with this post. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe it's really happening???? http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/ Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in the sand when it comes to global warming. No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww.. What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron. |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message ... "NotNow" wrote in message ... Keith Nuttle wrote: NotNow wrote: Just John II wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: J. Leo wrote: "But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to the national interest. If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to address." One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA? And, suppose no one of consequence follows. Full article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are no green house gases from a nuclear power plant. Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global warming I will accept it for what it is, politics. I agree with this post. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe it's really happening???? http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/ There are some people who believe the only long term economical solution for the energy deficiency is nuclear power. Duke Power in Eastern Carolina has also started the permit process to build several new additions to existing nuclear plants. However before they can build they must negotiate the many regulations that were designed to kill the nuclear industry. (On topic: One of the best fishing and sailing lakes in the Raleigh area is the 4000 acre Harris lake that is the part of the cooling system for the Sharon Harris nuclear plant. ) The THEY I was talking about are obama, pelosi, gore and other who continual say we have global warming but will not support the nuclear energy industry. Even the Cap and trade tax bill which is suppose to be in response to global warming gives no significant support for nuclear energy. I didn't know the U.S. government was in the nuclear power plant building industry. I'm quite liberal in my views, and I'm all for nuclear power. Funny how I can do that, huh? I don't goose step to any party. The Federal Government is in the Non building nuclear power plant business. The regulations make it so. Just where would you geniuses store all the spent radioactive materials generated by these plants for the next 10 thousand years?? Halifax. How much waste do you think they have to store? |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
|
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
H the K wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... Just John II wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote: Just John II wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe it's really happening???? http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/ Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in the sand when it comes to global warming. No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww.. What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron. "What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron." A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people have problems with liberal thinking. |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
Keith Nuttle wrote:
H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Just John II wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote: Just John II wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe it's really happening???? http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/ Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in the sand when it comes to global warming. No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww.. What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron. "What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron." A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people have problems with liberal thinking. It makes no sense to debate uneducated, ill-informed morons like The Freak. |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
In article , says...
H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Just John II wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote: Just John II wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe it's really happening???? http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/ Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in the sand when it comes to global warming. No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww.. What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron. "What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron." A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people have problems with liberal thinking. You haven't killfiled this idiot yet? Seriously, if everyone completely ignored him he would probably go nuts and eat his widdew capguns. Indeed, the world would be a better place.. -- Wafa free since 2009 |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... H the K wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Just John II wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:18 -0400, NotNow wrote: Just John II wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe it's really happening???? http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/ Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent man made global warrming, I will accept it for what it is, politics. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. What is politics is the conservatives sticking their collective heads in the sand when it comes to global warming. No, we just trust different scientists than you do. It is insulting when you consider there are as many on our side as yours when you really look at the numbers honestly. So you saying my head is buried is as bad as me suggesting yours is.. Neither are, we both have read up on it, and have simply come to opposing points of view.. Besides insulting me and the folks on my side is why we all have Harry plonked... ewwwwwww.. What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron. "What the foch would you know about global warming or anything else? You're a moron." A beautifully example of a liberal argument. and they wonder why people have problems with liberal thinking. You haven't killfiled this idiot yet? Seriously, if everyone completely ignored him he would probably go nuts and eat his widdew capguns. Indeed, the world would be a better place.. Moron. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
Just John II wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:39:17 -0400, NotNow wrote: Keith Nuttle wrote: NotNow wrote: Just John II wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: J. Leo wrote: "But a growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to the national interest. If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to address." One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA? And, suppose no one of consequence follows. Full article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are no green house gases from a nuclear power plant. Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global warming I will accept it for what it is, politics. I agree with this post. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. So if they start building nuclear power plants you'll instantly believe it's really happening???? http://www.ajc.com/business/southern-102043.html http://www.altdotenergy.com/2009/01/...t-for-florida/ There are some people who believe the only long term economical solution for the energy deficiency is nuclear power. Duke Power in Eastern Carolina has also started the permit process to build several new additions to existing nuclear plants. However before they can build they must negotiate the many regulations that were designed to kill the nuclear industry. (On topic: One of the best fishing and sailing lakes in the Raleigh area is the 4000 acre Harris lake that is the part of the cooling system for the Sharon Harris nuclear plant. ) The THEY I was talking about are obama, pelosi, gore and other who continual say we have global warming but will not support the nuclear energy industry. Even the Cap and trade tax bill which is suppose to be in response to global warming gives no significant support for nuclear energy. I didn't know the U.S. government was in the nuclear power plant building industry. I'm quite liberal in my views, and I'm all for nuclear power. Funny how I can do that, huh? I don't goose step to any party. Now just convince the liberals in power to get on the bandwagon. It's *really* hard to think they take manmade global warming seriously when they don't give a high priority to the best treatment available. Makes it sound like they just want your money. -- John H And I suppose that the conservative politicians DON'T want my money? |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What great lines...
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:18:12 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:
If the government had gotten behind a program to extract the energy out of nuclear waste rather than bury it, we would have a clean, reliable, continuously available, energy source with no concern about storing the waste as there would be none. The government? I thought "Free Market" was the Conservative mantra. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What great lines... | General | |||
Anchor lines | Cruising | |||
Great Canal and Great Lake trip site | Cruising | |||
12 meter lines | Boat Building | |||
Off Her Lines | ASA |