"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

J. Leo wrote:
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually
believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a
global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are
no green house gases from a nuclear power plant.

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global
warming I will accept it for what it is, politics.

On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:26:52 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

J. Leo wrote:
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world’s rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

If these people who keep saying there is global warming actually
believed the entire earth was warming, and it was going to create a
global catastrophe, they would be 100% behind nuclear power. There are
no green house gases from a nuclear power plant.

Until I hear they have started building nuclear plants to prevent global
warming I will accept it for what it is, politics.

Can I hear an "AMEN"?

AMEN!
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.

On Aug 9, 6:07*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"J. Leo" wrote in message

...



"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc...te.html?_r=1&t....

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.

Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.

There is no evidence for anthropegenic global warming at all. The
prophets of global warming mostly have carnon footprints 10x as large
as the average american so until they cut back, why pay any attention
to them.

Don White wrote:
"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.



Dummy, Mexico is a haven for companies that have production that doesn't
meet US EPA standards.

On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:37:19 -0400, D wrote:

Don White wrote:
"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.



Dummy, Mexico is a haven for companies that have production that doesn't
meet US EPA standards.

Don, it's very hard to believe you are calling someone else a dummy.

If we were to lead the way, then we should be building nuclear
reactors as fast as we can.

Wake up. Get back on the tit.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:37:19 -0400, D wrote:

Don White wrote:
"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.


Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be
the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.



Dummy, Mexico is a haven for companies that have production that doesn't
meet US EPA standards.

Don, it's very hard to believe you are calling someone else a dummy.

If we were to lead the way, then we should be building nuclear
reactors as fast as we can.

Wake up. Get back on the tit.
--
John H


Hee hee...Johnny, Johnny...looks like it's your dis-able seaman Dingy Dan
calling the names.
Now who's the dummy?

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 19:07:44 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.

Actually China passed the US in CO2 production a few years ago and
they are increasing the number of coal fired plants every day.
They also laugh at "cap and tax".

Dumb ass Donnie doesn't care about numbers.. He just said it, that's
what he and his ilk do. Say something until the media runs with it then
it becomes the new "truth". I just don't know how folks like this can
survive in the business world.. Oh wait, they have union protection.
--
Wafa free since 2009

J. Leo wrote:
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:37:19 -0400, D wrote:

Don White wrote:
"J. Leo" wrote in message
...
"But a growing number of policy makers say that the world's rising
temperatures, surging seas and melting glaciers are a direct threat to
the national interest.

If the United States does not lead the world in reducing fossil-fuel
consumption and thus emissions of global warming gases, proponents of
this view say, a series of global environmental, social, political and
possibly military crises loom that the nation will urgently have to
address."

One must wonder why the United States must be the 'leader'. Why not
Germany, or France, or even Canada? Does the prevention of all these
global crises depend solely on the leadership of the USA?

And, suppose no one of consequence follows.

Full article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/sc..._r=1&th&emc=th

Oh wait, John Kerry is involved. Now I understand.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary
thinking.

Good Lord Johnny...since the US is the worst offender.... you have to be the
ones to turn this around.
Everyone else will do their part as time passes.


Dummy, Mexico is a haven for companies that have production that doesn't
meet US EPA standards.

Don, it's very hard to believe you are calling someone else a dummy.

If we were to lead the way, then we should be building nuclear
reactors as fast as we can.

Wake up. Get back on the tit.
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Donny is stuck on his island and his only information comes from
socialist Government run Canuckistani TV And newspapers. Oh I forgot
Krausie of course. He's a great source for Donny.