Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene wrote:
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:35:46 -0400, BAR wrote: NotNow wrote: wrote: On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:22:44 -0700, jps wrote: Rachel: Do you think that calling the President a "nazi"...calling the President "Hilter"...is an implicit call for politically motivated violence? Didn't we just have 8 years of democrats calling Bush a nazi and worse? I didn't like it then and I don't like it now. We are constantly ratcheting down the acceptable level of dialog. I have noticed it is funny how people's attitude changes when it is their guy getting attacked. I really think this started in the 60s but it continues to get worse. Yes, Gene and I have been saying the same thing. I didn't like it (still don't) when Harry is completely one sided on everything, and I don't like it now that the conservatives of the group are doing the same exact thing with Obama. If you see behavior you do not like, speak up. But, when you only speak up when it is being performed by those whose views you are in opposition with you are viewed as a hypocrite. No, you are labeled a hypocrite, regardless, by the *other* or the *other other* self-righteous side..... Gene it is too bad that you have never asked me my views on organized religion, you would be surprised by my views. When I question your rabid views of religion you make the assumption that I am a fundie. You like to come across as a live and let live type of person. Yes, when people question your authority or your positions your behavior is often worse than a fundie. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:14:46 -0400, BAR wrote:
Gene wrote: On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:35:46 -0400, BAR wrote: NotNow wrote: wrote: On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:22:44 -0700, jps wrote: Rachel: Do you think that calling the President a "nazi"...calling the President "Hilter"...is an implicit call for politically motivated violence? Didn't we just have 8 years of democrats calling Bush a nazi and worse? I didn't like it then and I don't like it now. We are constantly ratcheting down the acceptable level of dialog. I have noticed it is funny how people's attitude changes when it is their guy getting attacked. I really think this started in the 60s but it continues to get worse. Yes, Gene and I have been saying the same thing. I didn't like it (still don't) when Harry is completely one sided on everything, and I don't like it now that the conservatives of the group are doing the same exact thing with Obama. If you see behavior you do not like, speak up. But, when you only speak up when it is being performed by those whose views you are in opposition with you are viewed as a hypocrite. No, you are labeled a hypocrite, regardless, by the *other* or the *other other* self-righteous side..... Gene it is too bad that you have never asked me my views on organized religion, you would be surprised by my views. When I question your rabid views of religion you make the assumption that I am a fundie. You like to come across as a live and let live type of person. Yes, when people question your authority or your positions your behavior is often worse than a fundie. He does like to make assumptions about the religious beliefs of others. He's never queried me either, yet he assumes I have beliefs he knows nothing of. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Alan Keyes Tells Us Why He Questions Obama's Presidency | General | |||
MEXICANS = HUMAN GARBAGE (this article tells it like it is) | General | |||
The Bible tells me so... | General | |||
Njikky tells a few more lies. | ASA |