On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:10:20 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

Maybe she should consider having her attorney look into the legality
BEFORE she commits ethics violations. I expect her legal bills would
be significantly lower.

jps wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:10:20 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.
Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

Maybe she should consider having her attorney look into the legality
BEFORE she commits ethics violations. I expect her legal bills would
be significantly lower.


I mentioned this the other day, but it seems apparent Palin either does
not listen to her professional advisers or doesn't have any.

It's part of being so mavericky.



--
A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant.

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:18:39 -0400, H the K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:10:20 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.
Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

Maybe she should consider having her attorney look into the legality
BEFORE she commits ethics violations. I expect her legal bills would
be significantly lower.


I mentioned this the other day, but it seems apparent Palin either does
not listen to her professional advisers or doesn't have any.

It's part of being so mavericky.

Part of being mavericky is that sometimes you end up with a stick up
your ass.

She's got 'em coming out of every orifice.