jps wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Anchorage Daily News

Ethics investigator rules against Palin


Gee. She sets up a legal defense fund to help pay off half a million
dollars of legal fees incurred while defending herself against 18
other bogus ethics violation allegations, most of which have been
dismissed and she gets hit with another ethics violation for doing so.

Almost sounds like entrapment to me.

Eisboch
It sounds to me as if she either has no competent advisers or ignores
their advice. I would bet it is the latter. She's just *so* mavericky.


It's often easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission.

Eisboch
That's reserved for Republican U.S. senators and governors who cheat on
their wives.

The liberal press is struggling hard to make any hay out of this one.

Are you watching and reading the "liberal press?"

She's a self-fulfilling train wreck who can't help but screw up. Not
a rule follower. Thinks her power overshadows what simple folk are
held to by law.

Remember, if she were in the White House, the Department of Law would
protect her. Bloody waste of time but what train wreck has any press
been able to avoid?

She's a headline grabber, no matter the slant of the media outlet.


And she's a paranoiac perpetual victim.

But, hey, SW Tom supported her, and contended here she was going to help
McCain win.


--
A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant.

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

And, like any citizen, if accused, indicted, tried and found guilty she
should pay the penalty.
So far, none of that has happened. Most allegations have been investigated
and dismissed.
She's been tried and found guilty in the liberal media only, who are so
preoccupied with her, her lifestyle, her interests and hobbies. It's
comical to watch.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
m...

Anchorage Daily News

Ethics investigator rules against Palin




Gee. She sets up a legal defense fund to help pay off half a million
dollars of legal fees incurred while defending herself against 18 other
bogus ethics violation allegations, most of which have been dismissed and
she gets hit with another ethics violation for doing so.

Almost sounds like entrapment to me.

Eisboch


Harry the Village Idiot is just obsessed with her.

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:55:11 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
et...
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

And, like any citizen, if accused, indicted, tried and found guilty she
should pay the penalty.
So far, none of that has happened. Most allegations have been investigated
and dismissed.
She's been tried and found guilty in the liberal media only, who are so
preoccupied with her, her lifestyle, her interests and hobbies. It's
comical to watch.

Eisboch


Sarah Palin has been bullied, by the liberal media, the Left, and even
a few elitist Republicans, from the time she hit the national stage.
There is really no more honestly appropriate way of putting it.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:10:20 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

Maybe she should consider having her attorney look into the legality
BEFORE she commits ethics violations. I expect her legal bills would
be significantly lower.

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:58:11 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:55:11 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
net...
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

And, like any citizen, if accused, indicted, tried and found guilty she
should pay the penalty.
So far, none of that has happened. Most allegations have been investigated
and dismissed.
She's been tried and found guilty in the liberal media only, who are so
preoccupied with her, her lifestyle, her interests and hobbies. It's
comical to watch.

Eisboch


Sarah Palin has been bullied, by the liberal media, the Left, and even
a few elitist Republicans, from the time she hit the national stage.
There is really no more honestly appropriate way of putting it.

Honestly? You're the arbiter of honesty? Yikes.

jps wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:10:20 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.
Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

Maybe she should consider having her attorney look into the legality
BEFORE she commits ethics violations. I expect her legal bills would
be significantly lower.


I mentioned this the other day, but it seems apparent Palin either does
not listen to her professional advisers or doesn't have any.

It's part of being so mavericky.



--
A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant.

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:18:39 -0400, H the K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:10:20 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.
Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

Maybe she should consider having her attorney look into the legality
BEFORE she commits ethics violations. I expect her legal bills would
be significantly lower.


I mentioned this the other day, but it seems apparent Palin either does
not listen to her professional advisers or doesn't have any.

It's part of being so mavericky.

Part of being mavericky is that sometimes you end up with a stick up
your ass.

She's got 'em coming out of every orifice.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:58:11 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:55:11 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
inet...
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's
travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

And, like any citizen, if accused, indicted, tried and found guilty she
should pay the penalty.
So far, none of that has happened. Most allegations have been
investigated
and dismissed.
She's been tried and found guilty in the liberal media only, who are so
preoccupied with her, her lifestyle, her interests and hobbies. It's
comical to watch.

Eisboch


Sarah Palin has been bullied, by the liberal media, the Left, and even
a few elitist Republicans, from the time she hit the national stage.
There is really no more honestly appropriate way of putting it.

Honestly? You're the arbiter of honesty? Yikes.

Cost you money whenever anybody sues you. My insurance agent and most of
North California State Farm agents cost them money. Mine $900 when they
were sued on ADA violations. The suer (sewer?) made 2 million the year
before suing companies over ADA stuff. He can not sue State Farm people as
they got him ruled a Vexious Litigant. But he is into suing Costco, etc
now.