On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:43:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:58:11 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:55:11 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
tinet...
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's
travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

And, like any citizen, if accused, indicted, tried and found guilty she
should pay the penalty.
So far, none of that has happened. Most allegations have been
investigated
and dismissed.
She's been tried and found guilty in the liberal media only, who are so
preoccupied with her, her lifestyle, her interests and hobbies. It's
comical to watch.

Eisboch


Sarah Palin has been bullied, by the liberal media, the Left, and even
a few elitist Republicans, from the time she hit the national stage.
There is really no more honestly appropriate way of putting it.

Honestly? You're the arbiter of honesty? Yikes.

Cost you money whenever anybody sues you. My insurance agent and most of
North California State Farm agents cost them money. Mine $900 when they
were sued on ADA violations. The suer (sewer?) made 2 million the year
before suing companies over ADA stuff. He can not sue State Farm people as
they got him ruled a Vexious Litigant. But he is into suing Costco, etc
now.

You'll not find any "Vexious Litigants" involved in Palin's troubles.
She was warned, advised and browbeaten for asking Walt Monegan to take
action against her former brother in law, after he'd already been
reviewed and reprimanded by the responsible state agency.

That didn't stop her and her husband from demanding that he be fired.

If anyone is a bully, it's her.

She didn't flinch when people in her audience screamed "kill him!"
referring to Obama when she whipped them into a frenzy.

Another anti-education, above-the-law fundie who deserves everything
she's getting.

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:30:48 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:43:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:58:11 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:55:11 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
news:lZidnaaWFKcBbvvXnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@posted. gtinet...
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's
travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

And, like any citizen, if accused, indicted, tried and found guilty she
should pay the penalty.
So far, none of that has happened. Most allegations have been
investigated
and dismissed.
She's been tried and found guilty in the liberal media only, who are so
preoccupied with her, her lifestyle, her interests and hobbies. It's
comical to watch.

Eisboch


Sarah Palin has been bullied, by the liberal media, the Left, and even
a few elitist Republicans, from the time she hit the national stage.
There is really no more honestly appropriate way of putting it.

Honestly? You're the arbiter of honesty? Yikes.

Cost you money whenever anybody sues you. My insurance agent and most of
North California State Farm agents cost them money. Mine $900 when they
were sued on ADA violations. The suer (sewer?) made 2 million the year
before suing companies over ADA stuff. He can not sue State Farm people as
they got him ruled a Vexious Litigant. But he is into suing Costco, etc
now.

You'll not find any "Vexious Litigants" involved in Palin's troubles.
She was warned, advised and browbeaten for asking Walt Monegan to take
action against her former brother in law, after he'd already been
reviewed and reprimanded by the responsible state agency.

That didn't stop her and her husband from demanding that he be fired.

If anyone is a bully, it's her.

She didn't flinch when people in her audience screamed "kill him!"
referring to Obama when she whipped them into a frenzy.

Another anti-education, above-the-law fundie who deserves everything
she's getting.

Even Michael Moore sprinkes his specious propaganda with some humor.
This bilge is not only vile and blatantly dishonest. It's completely
banal. Bullies come in all sizes and flavors. For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies." JPS - Just Propaganda, Son.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."

Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:20:03 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."

Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic

Oh, that wasn't Neil Young? No, I remember. That was all about
heroin abuse. (Excellent song, excellent group. Those were the days,
my friend - ala Mary Hopkins.)

It's too bad that these Palin abusers don't have a proper sense of
history or decency. Naturally, their immediate retreat is to the
Republican hypocrisy/family values argument. My only regret is that I
did succomb to the ad hominem in this last note. Still, I'd just as
soon call a horse a horse than pretend that I'm justified in bullying
other persons.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:30:48 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:43:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:58:11 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:55:11 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
news:lZidnaaWFKcBbvvXnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@posted .gtinet...
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Sounds like again, she didn't break any laws or commit any ethics
violations.

Laws or ethics? She did have to repay monies for her children's
travel.
Then there is the Branchflower report. While no laws were broken, the
report found that she broke the Executive Branch Ethics Act when she
pressured Monegan to fire Wooten. Nothing for nothing, but who
accumulates $500,000 in legal fees defending against frivolous charges?
Frankly, and this is only my guess, but I'm still suspicious of the
timing and specifics of her house building.

And, like any citizen, if accused, indicted, tried and found guilty she
should pay the penalty.
So far, none of that has happened. Most allegations have been
investigated
and dismissed.
She's been tried and found guilty in the liberal media only, who are so
preoccupied with her, her lifestyle, her interests and hobbies. It's
comical to watch.

Eisboch


Sarah Palin has been bullied, by the liberal media, the Left, and even
a few elitist Republicans, from the time she hit the national stage.
There is really no more honestly appropriate way of putting it.

Honestly? You're the arbiter of honesty? Yikes.

Cost you money whenever anybody sues you. My insurance agent and most of
North California State Farm agents cost them money. Mine $900 when they
were sued on ADA violations. The suer (sewer?) made 2 million the year
before suing companies over ADA stuff. He can not sue State Farm people as
they got him ruled a Vexious Litigant. But he is into suing Costco, etc
now.

You'll not find any "Vexious Litigants" involved in Palin's troubles.
She was warned, advised and browbeaten for asking Walt Monegan to take
action against her former brother in law, after he'd already been
reviewed and reprimanded by the responsible state agency.

That didn't stop her and her husband from demanding that he be fired.

If anyone is a bully, it's her.

She didn't flinch when people in her audience screamed "kill him!"
referring to Obama when she whipped them into a frenzy.

Another anti-education, above-the-law fundie who deserves everything
she's getting.

Even Michael Moore sprinkes his specious propaganda with some humor.
This bilge is not only vile and blatantly dishonest. It's completely
banal. Bullies come in all sizes and flavors. For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies." JPS - Just Propaganda, Son.

Mumbo jumbo bull****. She's a scumbag, plain and simple. Quit her
job to go cash in.

Anyone with your vocabulary and ability to rationalize who thinks
she's worth a plugged nickle needs to seek good therapy or just a
really hard slap across the face. Maybe you'd wake up.

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:48:41 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:21:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:20:03 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."

Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic

Oh, that wasn't Neil Young? No, I remember. That was all about
heroin abuse. (Excellent song, excellent group. Those were the days,
my friend - ala Mary Hopkins.)

It's too bad that these Palin abusers don't have a proper sense of
history or decency. Naturally, their immediate retreat is to the
Republican hypocrisy/family values argument. My only regret is that I
did succomb to the ad hominem in this last note. Still, I'd just as
soon call a horse a horse than pretend that I'm justified in bullying
other persons.


From Shannon More on Huff Post


An appeal to authority? Why should I be skeptical?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:08:50 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:48:41 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:21:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:20:03 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."

Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic

Oh, that wasn't Neil Young? No, I remember. That was all about
heroin abuse. (Excellent song, excellent group. Those were the days,
my friend - ala Mary Hopkins.)

It's too bad that these Palin abusers don't have a proper sense of
history or decency. Naturally, their immediate retreat is to the
Republican hypocrisy/family values argument. My only regret is that I
did succomb to the ad hominem in this last note. Still, I'd just as
soon call a horse a horse than pretend that I'm justified in bullying
other persons.


From Shannon More on Huff Post


An appeal to authority? Why should I be skeptical?

Is this supposed to pass for logic? Pray tell what you're referencing
so I may bask in your deep intellect.

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:02:59 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:08:50 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:48:41 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:21:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:20:03 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."

Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic

Oh, that wasn't Neil Young? No, I remember. That was all about
heroin abuse. (Excellent song, excellent group. Those were the days,
my friend - ala Mary Hopkins.)

It's too bad that these Palin abusers don't have a proper sense of
history or decency. Naturally, their immediate retreat is to the
Republican hypocrisy/family values argument. My only regret is that I
did succomb to the ad hominem in this last note. Still, I'd just as
soon call a horse a horse than pretend that I'm justified in bullying
other persons.


From Shannon More on Huff Post


An appeal to authority? Why should I be skeptical?

Is this supposed to pass for logic? Pray tell what you're referencing
so I may bask in your deep intellect.

It's far from being nonsensical. And it doesn't take inscrutable
genius to appreciate the rudiments of thought.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_Authority

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:02:59 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:08:50 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:48:41 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:21:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:20:03 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."
Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic
Oh, that wasn't Neil Young? No, I remember. That was all about
heroin abuse. (Excellent song, excellent group. Those were the days,
my friend - ala Mary Hopkins.)

It's too bad that these Palin abusers don't have a proper sense of
history or decency. Naturally, their immediate retreat is to the
Republican hypocrisy/family values argument. My only regret is that I
did succomb to the ad hominem in this last note. Still, I'd just as
soon call a horse a horse than pretend that I'm justified in bullying
other persons.

From Shannon More on Huff Post

An appeal to authority? Why should I be skeptical?
Is this supposed to pass for logic? Pray tell what you're referencing
so I may bask in your deep intellect.

It's far from being nonsensical. And it doesn't take inscrutable
genius to appreciate the rudiments of thought.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_Authority

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


Palin...the gift that keeps on giving, redux:

ABC News
Sarah Palin Says Farewell to Alaska Governor's Office
Poll Shows Her Popularity is Suffering, But Could She Have a Political
Second Act?
By JOHN HENDREN

July 24, 2009 —

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, once considered a top candidate for 2012 GOP
presidential nomination after sharing the ticket with Sen. John McCain
last year, leaves the governor's office this weekend with an
increasingly negative image and concerns over the depth of her intellect
that threaten any future political candidacy.

Just four in 10 voters now hold a favorable view of Palin overall -- a
new low, down from 58 percent last year, an ABC News/Washington Post
poll has found. A majority of 53 percent now view her unfavorably, a
perilous figure for any public office seeker.


- - -


Prediction?


Palin will continue to make ignorant, divisive statements, the precise
sort of crap that appeals to her supporters, the basest of the GOP base.

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:15:06 -0400, H K
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:02:59 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:08:50 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:48:41 -0700, jps wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:21:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:20:03 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:12:38 -0500, wrote:

For those having
trouble making sense of all of this please pick up a copy of "How to
call a Horse a Horse for Dummies."
Or maybe just watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0KKGdb4qUY

Heck of a lot easier.

--Vic
Oh, that wasn't Neil Young? No, I remember. That was all about
heroin abuse. (Excellent song, excellent group. Those were the days,
my friend - ala Mary Hopkins.)

It's too bad that these Palin abusers don't have a proper sense of
history or decency. Naturally, their immediate retreat is to the
Republican hypocrisy/family values argument. My only regret is that I
did succomb to the ad hominem in this last note. Still, I'd just as
soon call a horse a horse than pretend that I'm justified in bullying
other persons.

From Shannon More on Huff Post

An appeal to authority? Why should I be skeptical?
Is this supposed to pass for logic? Pray tell what you're referencing
so I may bask in your deep intellect.

It's far from being nonsensical. And it doesn't take inscrutable
genius to appreciate the rudiments of thought.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_Authority

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


Palin...the gift that keeps on giving, redux:

ABC News
Sarah Palin Says Farewell to Alaska Governor's Office
Poll Shows Her Popularity is Suffering, But Could She Have a Political
Second Act?
By JOHN HENDREN

July 24, 2009 —

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, once considered a top candidate for 2012 GOP
presidential nomination after sharing the ticket with Sen. John McCain
last year, leaves the governor's office this weekend with an
increasingly negative image and concerns over the depth of her intellect
that threaten any future political candidacy.

Just four in 10 voters now hold a favorable view of Palin overall -- a
new low, down from 58 percent last year, an ABC News/Washington Post
poll has found. A majority of 53 percent now view her unfavorably, a
perilous figure for any public office seeker.


- - -


Prediction?


Palin will continue to make ignorant, divisive statements, the precise
sort of crap that appeals to her supporters, the basest of the GOP base.


If Palin ruins herself, there is nothing to lament. If she is ruined
by a perpetual onslaught of character assassination, then I have
complete sympathy for her. Any damage, for the most part, that she
has accrued, as it now stands, has come from egotists and gutless
assassins.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access