"HK" wrote in message
...
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:







"HK" wrote in message
news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.
The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion
into it and it has never been profitable.
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to
further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.
The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.
Swiped from KOS
And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.
Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar...
The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits
on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.
The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the
third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4
million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.
The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International
Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the
quarter.
Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while
Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible
downgrade.
What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit?
Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as
they go along.. What a waste of resources..


Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant,
and hopelessly stupid idiot like you.

Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in
Testaments:

"An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of
lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie,
nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother,
nor is able to answer to any such easie question."

You know, like "built any boats lately?"


Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message.

Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news
The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to
further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further
his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS



And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge
of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1
The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits
on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry
battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the
third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from
13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a
year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International
Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The
New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent
during the quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it
was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status,
while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for
possible downgrade.





Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are
operated to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.

I do get the difference. KOS is not exactly the most objective source
for anything. Its existence is due in part to the largesse of a
billionaire with his own agenda. That sort of makes KOS a rag like the
ones you slammed. As I said, tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Relax. Have some fun. Go boating. Show your wife how lucky she is to
have a man like you.


KOS doesn't pretend to be a newspaper. It is an opinion site. It does
have writers who present factually based articles, and it does "reprint"
factual news from other sites.

Faux News, the NY Post, the Wash Times, et cetera, are nothing more than
the personal rags and playthings of their owners. The Wash Times is
owned and operated by the Loonie Moonies, and is run as an adjunct to
their political and religious agenda.

Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:







"HK" wrote in message
news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.
The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion
into it and it has never been profitable.
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to
further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.
The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further
his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.
Swiped from KOS
And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.
Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar...

The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter
profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.
The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the
third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4
million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.
The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International
Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New
York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during
the
quarter.
Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while
Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible
downgrade.
What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit?
Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as
they go along.. What a waste of resources..


Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated,
ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you.

Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote
in Testaments:

"An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of
lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to
twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his
father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question."

You know, like "built any boats lately?"


Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message.



In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are
identical...uninformed idiocy.

On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:51 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

HK wrote:
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news
The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.

snip


Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated
to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.

If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ
Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut
down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals
re up to.

Oy.

jps wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:51 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

HK wrote:
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.
snip

Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated
to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.
If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ
Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut
down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals
re up to.

Oy.


"Russ" Limbaugh...his fans still can't spell his name after all these
years.

On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:32:04 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:51 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

HK wrote:
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.
snip

Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated
to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.
If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ
Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut
down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals
re up to.

Oy.


"Russ" Limbaugh...his fans still can't spell his name after all these
years.

The use of "informed" was what got me. Twisting facts into fiction is
what Rush does best. A leader for simps who want to have a problem
with liberals 'cause they were never taught to share.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news
The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to
further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS



And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1
The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits
on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered
by online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the
third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from
13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a
year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International
Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The
New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent
during the quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while
Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible
downgrade.





Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated
to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.

I do get the difference. KOS is not exactly the most objective source for
anything. Its existence is due in part to the largesse of a billionaire
with his own agenda. That sort of makes KOS a rag like the ones you
slammed. As I said, tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Relax. Have some fun. Go boating. Show your wife how lucky she is to have
a man like you.


KOS doesn't pretend to be a newspaper. It is an opinion site. It does have
writers who present factually based articles, and it does "reprint"
factual news from other sites.

Faux News, the NY Post, the Wash Times, et cetera, are nothing more than
the personal rags and playthings of their owners. The Wash Times is owned
and operated by the Loonie Moonies, and is run as an adjunct to their
political and religious agenda.


Thanks for the education. KOS has its own agenda, just like the "rags" you
think are evil. No need to discuss further. Now go have some fun. Show your
wife how lucky she is to have a man like you.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:







"HK" wrote in message
news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.
The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion
into it and it has never been profitable.
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to
further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.
The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further
his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.
Swiped from KOS
And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge
of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.
Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar...
The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits
on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered
by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.
The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the
third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4
million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.
The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International
Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New
York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during
the
quarter.
Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it
was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while
Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible
downgrade.
What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit?
Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as
they go along.. What a waste of resources..


Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated,
ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you.

Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in
Testaments:

"An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of
lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie,
nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or
mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question."

You know, like "built any boats lately?"


Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message.



In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are
identical...uninformed idiocy.

I rest my case.

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:24:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:







"HK" wrote in message
news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.
The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion
into it and it has never been profitable.
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to
further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.
The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further
his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.
Swiped from KOS
And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge
of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.
Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar...
The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits
on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered
by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.
The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the
third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4
million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.
The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International
Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New
York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during
the
quarter.
Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it
was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while
Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible
downgrade.
What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit?
Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as
they go along.. What a waste of resources..


Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated,
ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you.

Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in
Testaments:

"An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of
lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie,
nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or
mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question."

You know, like "built any boats lately?"


Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message.



In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are
identical...uninformed idiocy.

I rest my case.

That'd be foolish Perry, since you'd lose.

On Jul 1, 4:12*pm, HK wrote:

sniped past blather
KOS doesn't pretend to be a newspaper. It is an opinion site. It does
have writers who present factually based articles, and it does "reprint"
factual news from other sites.

So, Herr Krause. You finally admit that "The KOS" is as worthless as
"The Onion" Or the grocery market tabloid, "The Examiner?"