jps wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:01:13 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock
wrote:

On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:44:00 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are
deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of
wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You
are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow
wherever you go.
Minor league stuff - when you want to move up to the majors, let me
know.

You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted
boggish foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry ****head cockup
pratting naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You
dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
Sadly, I understood every single word of that. :)

Kind of makes me long for the days of Gharlane of Eddore, Deacon,
James Boe, Huntress, Compass Wrong, Blue Avatar, xxxgoddessxxx, Rat
Face, Right Way Corrigan and the other greats of the early days of
Usenet. Flames that were nicely composed and edited, true works of art
that never used curse words, but instead, cut, filleted and were
extremely exacting in their effectiveness.

Good times man, good times. :)

Clearly stolen by Ruggie but lacking attribution.

I did put quotes around the creative insult, but forgot to stick in the
link. With all of the English slang, no one would ever think it was
written by an American.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects