On Mar 24, 7:45*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 24, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Mar 24, 12:15 pm, "Don White" wrote:

wrote in message
....
On Mar 24, 7:52 am, "Don White" wrote:
"Mr. Jim" wrote in message
...
Subject: Fw: Goodbye America
?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul ,
Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:
* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million Republicans:
143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans
won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in
government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the
"complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of
democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already
having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA
in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by all
means,
delete this message.
If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how
much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our
freedom
My my...all those 'people of colour' with the vote.
Gives you nightmares..eh?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I suppose you'll lie again and purport to have "facts" that he has
nightmares, huh? You aren't coming off any more credible than Harry
lately, and that's bad.
************************************************** **************
Quit stalking me...or I'll add that to your "facts" list.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Pssst, dummy......I never said *I* had ANY kind of list. YOU did,
however, state right here that you DO have "facts" about me. Let's see
them. Again, you're getting almost as non-credible as Harry. Is that
your goal, to be known as as much of a liar as Harry? Show me the
facts if you have any. If you don't, then admit it.

Watch...the next thing will be the " Wanna Wager " ...as Loogys
gambling addiction once again rears its ugly head. I guess that's how
he off-sets his ****ty Army Pension.....

Either that, or he will "dare" you to come down to ****ty-Lanta, where
he will confront you by peeing down his pants leg.

I guess I missed the post about Loogy being in the army. Are you sure
you aren't thinking about Herring? I agree it is easy to confuse the two....

My bad...they're both the same....

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Mar 24, 6:15 am, "Mr. Jim" wrote:
Subject: Fw: Goodbye America

?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul
, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:

* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1

land doesn't vote. nor do states. only people vote. so the stats are
irrelevant.

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of
the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living
in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."

not quite. the states won by the GOP were those where abortion,
divorce and teen pregnancy is rampant. IOW where people don't practice
what they preach. and they are states where people get more from the
govt than they pay in taxes.


If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by
all means, delete this message.


this is the problem with conservatives: they want to deny citizenship
to hard working people and give it to the chairman of AIG and lehman
bros.


People do not vote for the President. States vote for the President.
Did you sleep during Civics class? How a state picks their Electors is
up to the state. Just happens that now all states have elections to pick
the Electoral slate. And most states do not require the Electors to
actually vote for the person picked by their electors. California, they
only have to vote for the chosen candidate on the first ballot. So if a
tie on the first ballot, the Electoral College could vote for someone not
even on the ballot.

Jesus, Bill, is that the latest right wing wet dream, that since the
"conservatives" will not win the presidential election in 2012 (with who?
Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal?), the best hope is to subvert the electoral
college?

You need to expand your horizons beyond Faux News and World Nutcase Daily.
The Onion is more reliable and accurate than either Faux or WND.


If my wet dream as you state was to subvert the Electoral College, it would
not be for either a Dem or Repub. I would shake up the status qup. You
must have slept though Civics also. Just pointing out the People do not get
to vote for the President.

On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:52:12 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Mar 24, 3:01 pm, HK wrote:

Just ask
Herring about the Latinos who live down the street, or the blacks
whose
families he insulted while he was working as a substitute teacher.

You mean that dork actually tried to teach someone something? The poor
subjects.


Well, I don't know that he *tried to teach* during his post-army career
as a substitute teacher. What he mostly did here was whine about the
kids in his classes and their "cultural differences." Apparently a large
percentage were kids "of color."

It was pointed out a couple weeks ago that those comments were lies
you made up. Yet you persist.

Are you really the liar so many here say you are?

On Mar 24, 10:51*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Mar 24, 6:15 am, "Mr. Jim" wrote:

Subject: Fw: Goodbye America

?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul
, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:

* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1

land doesn't vote. nor do states. only people vote. so the stats are
irrelevant.



Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of
the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living
in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."

not quite. the states won by the GOP were those where abortion,
divorce and teen pregnancy is rampant. IOW where people don't practice
what they preach. and they are states where people get more from the
govt than they pay in taxes.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by
all means, delete this message.

this is the problem with conservatives: they want to deny citizenship
to hard working people and give it to the chairman of AIG and lehman
bros.

People do not vote for the President.

you missed the point, didn't you. he tried to insinuate that more
PEOPLE voted for mccain than voted for obama. that is not true.

*States vote for the President. *Did
you sleep during Civics class?

states do not vote. electors in the electoral college vote. did you
sleep during civics class?


*How a state picks their Electors is up to
the state. *Just happens that now all states have elections to pick the
Electoral slate. *And most states do not require the Electors to actually
vote for the person picked by their electors. *California, they only have to
vote for the chosen candidate on the first ballot. *So if a tie on the first
ballot, the Electoral College could vote for someone not even on the ballot.

which is completely irrelevant to the post.

and your point about 'states' voting is wrong. electors vote. not
state.

On Mar 24, 10:02*pm, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
....
On Mar 24, 6:15 am, "Mr. Jim" wrote:
Subject: Fw: Goodbye America

?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul
, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:

* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1

land doesn't vote. nor do states. only people vote. so the stats are
irrelevant.

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of
the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living
in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."

not quite. the states won by the GOP were those where abortion,
divorce and teen pregnancy is rampant. IOW where people don't practice
what they preach. and they are states where people get more from the
govt than they pay in taxes.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by
all means, delete this message.

this is the problem with conservatives: they want to deny citizenship
to hard working people and give it to the chairman of AIG and lehman
bros.

People do not vote for the President. *States vote for the President. *Did
you sleep during Civics class? *How a state picks their Electors is up to
the state. *Just happens that now all states have elections to pick the
Electoral slate. *And most states do not require the Electors to actually
vote for the person picked by their electors. *California, they only have to
vote for the chosen candidate on the first ballot. *So if a tie on the first
ballot, the Electoral College could vote for someone not even on the ballot.

Jesus, Bill, is that the latest right wing wet dream, that since the
"conservatives" will not win the presidential election in 2012 (with
who? Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal?), the best hope is to subvert the
electoral college?

You need to expand your horizons beyond Faux News and World Nutcase
Daily. The Onion is more reliable and accurate than either Faux or WND.- Hide quoted text -


the right wing take, ala scalia, is that bush won the 2000 election
even though he lost the popular vote by 500,000

and obama lost the past election even though he got 52% of the popular
vote...

typical right wing horse****.

On Mar 25, 4:01*am, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

m...





Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
....
On Mar 24, 6:15 am, "Mr. Jim" wrote:
Subject: Fw: Goodbye America

?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul
, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:

* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1

land doesn't vote. nor do states. only people vote. so the stats are
irrelevant.

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of
the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living
in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."

not quite. the states won by the GOP were those where abortion,
divorce and teen pregnancy is rampant. IOW where people don't practice
what they preach. and they are states where people get more from the
govt than they pay in taxes.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by
all means, delete this message.

this is the problem with conservatives: they want to deny citizenship
to hard working people and give it to the chairman of AIG and lehman
bros.

People do not vote for the President. *States vote for the President..
Did you sleep during Civics class? *How a state picks their Electors is
up to the state. *Just happens that now all states have elections to pick
the Electoral slate. *And most states do not require the Electors to
actually vote for the person picked by their electors. *California, they
only have to vote for the chosen candidate on the first ballot. *So if a
tie on the first ballot, the Electoral College could vote for someone not
even on the ballot.

Jesus, Bill, is that the latest right wing wet dream, that since the
"conservatives" will not win the presidential election in 2012 (with who?
Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal?), the best hope is to subvert the electoral
college?

You need to expand your horizons beyond Faux News and World Nutcase Daily.
The Onion is more reliable and accurate than either Faux or WND.

If my wet dream as you state was to subvert the Electoral College, it would
not be for either a Dem or Repub. *I would shake up the status qup. *You
must have slept though Civics also. *Just pointing out the People do not get
to vote for the President.-

nor do counties.

you need a few dozen civics classes yourself.

wf3h wrote:
On Mar 24, 10:02 pm, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Mar 24, 6:15 am, "Mr. Jim" wrote:
Subject: Fw: Goodbye America
?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul
, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:
* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1
land doesn't vote. nor do states. only people vote. so the stats are
irrelevant.
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of
the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living
in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."
not quite. the states won by the GOP were those where abortion,
divorce and teen pregnancy is rampant. IOW where people don't practice
what they preach. and they are states where people get more from the
govt than they pay in taxes.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by
all means, delete this message.
this is the problem with conservatives: they want to deny citizenship
to hard working people and give it to the chairman of AIG and lehman
bros.
People do not vote for the President. States vote for the President. Did
you sleep during Civics class? How a state picks their Electors is up to
the state. Just happens that now all states have elections to pick the
Electoral slate. And most states do not require the Electors to actually
vote for the person picked by their electors. California, they only have to
vote for the chosen candidate on the first ballot. So if a tie on the first
ballot, the Electoral College could vote for someone not even on the ballot.
Jesus, Bill, is that the latest right wing wet dream, that since the
"conservatives" will not win the presidential election in 2012 (with
who? Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal?), the best hope is to subvert the
electoral college?

You need to expand your horizons beyond Faux News and World Nutcase
Daily. The Onion is more reliable and accurate than either Faux or WND.- Hide quoted text -


the right wing take, ala scalia, is that bush won the 2000 election
even though he lost the popular vote by 500,000

and obama lost the past election even though he got 52% of the popular
vote...

typical right wing horse****.


It's hard to tell among the winger potentials who will reach the bottom
faster...Palin...or Jindal. I just read a long piece about Palin, a part
of which compared her to Eva Peron in some ways. I hadn't thought about
that before...

On Mar 25, 7:44*am, HK wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Mar 24, 10:02 pm, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
....
On Mar 24, 6:15 am, "Mr. Jim" wrote:
Subject: Fw: Goodbye America
?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul
, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:
* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1
land doesn't vote. nor do states. only people vote. so the stats are
irrelevant.
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of
the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living
in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."
not quite. the states won by the GOP were those where abortion,
divorce and teen pregnancy is rampant. IOW where people don't practice
what they preach. and they are states where people get more from the
govt than they pay in taxes.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by
all means, delete this message.
this is the problem with conservatives: they want to deny citizenship
to hard working people and give it to the chairman of AIG and lehman
bros.
People do not vote for the President. *States vote for the President. *Did
you sleep during Civics class? *How a state picks their Electors is up to
the state. *Just happens that now all states have elections to pick the
Electoral slate. *And most states do not require the Electors to actually
vote for the person picked by their electors. *California, they only have to
vote for the chosen candidate on the first ballot. *So if a tie on the first
ballot, the Electoral College could vote for someone not even on the ballot.
Jesus, Bill, is that the latest right wing wet dream, that since the
"conservatives" will not win the presidential election in 2012 (with
who? Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal?), the best hope is to subvert the
electoral college?

You need to expand your horizons beyond Faux News and World Nutcase
Daily. The Onion is more reliable and accurate than either Faux or WND..- Hide quoted text -

the right wing take, ala scalia, is that bush won the 2000 election
even though he lost the popular vote by 500,000

and obama lost the past election even though he got 52% of the popular
vote...

typical right wing horse****.

It's hard to tell among the winger potentials who will reach the bottom
faster...Palin...or Jindal. I just read a long piece about Palin, a part
of which compared her to Eva Peron in some ways. I hadn't thought about
that before...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Post it then, liar.

On Mar 25, 7:10*am, Blazer wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:52:12 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 24, 3:01 pm, HK wrote:

Just ask
Herring about the Latinos who live down the street, or the blacks
whose
families he insulted while he was working as a substitute teacher.

You mean that dork actually tried to teach someone something? The poor
subjects.

Well, I don't know that he *tried to teach* during his post-army career
as a substitute teacher. What he mostly did here was whine about the
kids in his classes and their "cultural differences." Apparently a large
percentage were kids "of color."

It was pointed out a couple weeks ago that those comments were lies
you made up. Yet you persist.

Are you really the liar so many here say you are?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, he sure is! You should look back into the archives and see the
whoppers he's tried to get people to believe here. It's almost comical
in a sick sort of way to think that he actually thinks people will
believe them all! The only person here who believes his many, many
lies is Don. If you want to see an example of just SOME of his lies,
let me know!

On Mar 25, 7:44*am, HK wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Mar 24, 10:02 pm, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message
....
On Mar 24, 6:15 am, "Mr. Jim" wrote:
Subject: Fw: Goodbye America
?
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul
, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2008
Presidential election:
* Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
* Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans:
2,427,000
* Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
* Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats:
13.2 Republicans: 2.1
land doesn't vote. nor do states. only people vote. so the stats are
irrelevant.
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory
Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of
the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living
in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare..."
not quite. the states won by the GOP were those where abortion,
divorce and teen pregnancy is rampant. IOW where people don't practice
what they preach. and they are states where people get more from the
govt than they pay in taxes.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by
all means, delete this message.
this is the problem with conservatives: they want to deny citizenship
to hard working people and give it to the chairman of AIG and lehman
bros.
People do not vote for the President. *States vote for the President. *Did
you sleep during Civics class? *How a state picks their Electors is up to
the state. *Just happens that now all states have elections to pick the
Electoral slate. *And most states do not require the Electors to actually
vote for the person picked by their electors. *California, they only have to
vote for the chosen candidate on the first ballot. *So if a tie on the first
ballot, the Electoral College could vote for someone not even on the ballot.
Jesus, Bill, is that the latest right wing wet dream, that since the
"conservatives" will not win the presidential election in 2012 (with
who? Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal?), the best hope is to subvert the
electoral college?

You need to expand your horizons beyond Faux News and World Nutcase
Daily. The Onion is more reliable and accurate than either Faux or WND..- Hide quoted text -

the right wing take, ala scalia, is that bush won the 2000 election
even though he lost the popular vote by 500,000

and obama lost the past election even though he got 52% of the popular
vote...

typical right wing horse****.

It's hard to tell among the winger potentials who will reach the bottom
faster...Palin...or Jindal. I just read a long piece about Palin, a part
of which compared her to Eva Peron in some ways. I hadn't thought about
that before

the right wing loved her because she's another bush...an easily
manipulated idiot. if she ever wins, cheney will train her like the
bitch she is.