wrote:

We know, as long as you are getting attention of some kind... Don't
worry Harry, we will not forget you, we are not haters like you...


No one is as filled with the bile of "unappreciation" as you are,
scotty, and no one shoots often as with as much "vile" and frequency as
you do.

Read some of your own posts. Even if they make you puke.

On Dec 14, 12:15*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
We know, as long as you are getting attention of some kind... *Don't
worry Harry, we will not forget you, we are not haters like you...

No one is as filled with the bile of "unappreciation" as you are,
scotty, and no one shoots often as with as much "vile" and frequency as
you do.

Read some of your own posts. Even if they make you puke.

You're crazy....

Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 14, 9:01 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Boater wrote:

It's going to be a "fun fun fun" four to eight years, watching
righties
everywhere choking on their own bile.
This does sum up your philosophy of life. Instead of enjoying
watching
your political party implement their agenda, that they believe will
strengthening the economy, protecting Americans, while preserving the
Constitution, reestablishing America as a world leader, that can
build
consensus to solve global problems etc., you are going to enjoy
"watching righties everywhere chocking on their own bile".

Have you been this way all of your life?

Remember, they are the party of intolerance and hate.. This is what
you get with the "far left". Unfortunately, that tends to be the
majority of the party recently...

NO, Harry does not represent anyone in any party. He is a
frustrated old man, who is desperately seeking emotional support in
rec.boats. Since he can not find any positive support, he is willing
to accept negative. He is like a 2 yr old whose parents ignore him,
so he throws a tantrum. I would guess he was ignored or abused by
his father, and is looking for some kind of confirmation from anyone.


Ahhh...more psychobabble from the rec.boats pansy.

No it is a very accurate analysis.


More rationalization from Reggie the rec.boats pansy.

Sorry...*still* not interested in the b.s. you spew.

Harry,
I have never known anyone who is more obsessed about other people's
bile, puss and ejaculate than you are. Can you imagine what your wife,
friends or neighbors would say if they read any of your posts in
rec.boats? Can you imagine what they would think if they read your 10
plus years of inflammatory hate filled messages?

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:17:37 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 14, 8:23Â*am, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:23:39 -0500, John wrote:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...tribution.html

Thunder, do you really believe the 'worker' has increased his output by
20%? Does that line make sense to you?

The fact that you read it in an anti-Bush article doesn't make it true.

As you are clearly too lazy to do your own search:

http://www.bls.gov/lpc/prodybar.htm

Let's see, 7 * 2.5 = 17.5 Â*You could then extrapolate, considering it is
2008. Â*So, yes, I do believe the 'worker' has increased his output by
20%, even though, I probably shouldn't believe anything that comes out of
the Bush government.

There is no way in the world the American worker of present day works
harder than the guy in my dad's day. I have been victim to being told
to slow down by a union. In all fairness (which we won't expect from
the other side) I was also told to slow down while on piece work at
Standadyne, a non union shop...

Piece work is sort of a special deal. When I pushed pieces I was
aware that I was in my 20's and strong as a horse.
The guy on the next shift might be 50 and not so healthy or strong.
If I was being timed I had to go slower. Still worked hard, but
shortened my break times. Didn't want to screw up the older guys.
They did plenty of work.

--Vic

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:

Harry,
I have never known anyone


Reggie, I *don't care* who you have or haven't known, or what you think.

Got it?

"Boater" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Dec 14, 11:20 am, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 14, 8:23 am, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:23:39 -0500, John wrote:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...tribution.html
Thunder, do you really believe the 'worker' has increased his output
by
20%? Does that line make sense to you?
The fact that you read it in an anti-Bush article doesn't make it
true.
As you are clearly too lazy to do your own search:
http://www.bls.gov/lpc/prodybar.htm
Let's see, 7 * 2.5 = 17.5 You could then extrapolate, considering it
is
2008. So, yes, I do believe the 'worker' has increased his output by
20%, even though, I probably shouldn't believe anything that comes out
of
the Bush government.
There is no way in the world the American worker of present day works
harder than the guy in my dad's day. I have been victim to being told
to slow down by a union. In all fairness (which we won't expect from
the other side) I was also told to slow down while on piece work at
Standadyne, a non union shop...
Gosh, you'd think someone with your party affiliation and your skills
would be running something.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, I am... A business and a race team.... oh, and a successful family
with great kids.. I also take care of my dad and help out my
inlaws...er, I could go on, but for you, it's not worth it...


A race team?

snerk

You haven't heard of the 'Justhate Syndicate'?

On Dec 14, 1:28*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message

...





wrote:
On Dec 14, 11:20 am, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 14, 8:23 am, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:23:39 -0500, John wrote:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...tribution.html
Thunder, do you really believe the 'worker' has increased his output
by
20%? Does that line make sense to you?
The fact that you read it in an anti-Bush article doesn't make it
true.
As you are clearly too lazy to do your own search:
http://www.bls.gov/lpc/prodybar.htm
Let's see, 7 * 2.5 = 17.5 *You could then extrapolate, considering it
is
2008. *So, yes, I do believe the 'worker' has increased his output by
20%, even though, I probably shouldn't believe anything that comes out
of
the Bush government.
There is no way in the world the American worker of present day works
harder than the guy in my dad's day. I have been victim to being told
to slow down by a union. In all fairness (which we won't expect from
the other side) I was also told to slow down while on piece work at
Standadyne, a non union shop...
Gosh, you'd think someone with your party affiliation and your skills
would be running something.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, I am... A business and a race team.... oh, and a successful family
with great kids.. I also take care of my dad and help out my
inlaws...er, I could go on, but for you, it's not worth it...

A race team?

snerk

You haven't heard of the 'Justhate Syndicate'?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, do they have a website, any literature or are you just making it
up like everything else?

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:23:49 -0600, wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:23:39 -0500, John wrote:


http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...tribution.html

Thunder, do you really believe the 'worker' has increased his output by
20%? Does that line make sense to you?

The fact that you read it in an anti-Bush article doesn't make it true.

As you are clearly too lazy to do your own search:

http://www.bls.gov/lpc/prodybar.htm

Let's see, 7 * 2.5 = 17.5 You could then extrapolate, considering it is
2008. So, yes, I do believe the 'worker' has increased his output by
20%, even though, I probably shouldn't believe anything that comes out of
the Bush government.

Well, that's kind of the point. What data do you trust?

Let's use a real life example. The Frito Lay plant down in Killingly
just put three robots into their packing and shipping department.
Replaced 23 workers who were moved to other positions within the
plant. The bots work 24/7/365, settting up boxes, packing them,
palleting them and moving them to a staging area for the warehouse or
the shipping dock.

Who should benefit from the obvious productivity increase - the
company or the workers?

So if Frito's productivity increased, but the wages didn't, whose
fault is that? Even more to the point, why should be workers get more
money because the company invested in a robotic operation that
improved productivity? Are they better off having a job at the same
wage or unemployment?

What's his point? That the worker is oppressed? Why?

What's the measure of productivity he's quoting? Per unit, per hour,
per what? I would think that if a company over 8 years increased it's
productivity by 20% (which is 2.5%/yr by the way) that's not a whole
lot considering inflation, raw material costs, etc. And if your
company has a high labor quotient to the cost of production, that's
almost negligible.

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:38:43 -0600, wrote:

You have an assembly line, all your workers are keeping up, how do you
tell who is the "outstanding" worker?

Tell me- out of curiosity.

Are you for "merit" pay for teachers?

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:38:43 -0600, wrote:

You have an assembly line, all your workers are keeping up, how do you
tell who is the "outstanding" worker?

Tell me- out of curiosity.

Are you for "merit" pay for teachers?


On what basis is "merit" being determined, and who makes the determination?