On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:51:36 -0500, "Glenn Ashmore" wrote:

Anyone ever attempt to build one of these?
http://www.dv-fansler.com/Projects/9.../900gd-dro.htm

I downloaded and compiled the code but would like to know if it is reliable
before I go to the trouble to design and make the boards. Considering all
the parts can be had for under $50 and an AutoAnchor cost over $500 it looks
pretty attractive.


I've used the proximity devices in several projects, and they work
well. They are available from the usual suspects, Allied, Newark, etc.

I visited the web site...the source code is a dot src file, which I refuse
to open...any one have it in a dot txt format? I've looked at a ton of
de-bounce routines, and have invented a pretty fool-proof one. I'm
always curious how others do it.

Norm B

engsol wrote:

snip
I visited the web site...the source code is a dot src file, which I refuse
to open...any one have it in a dot txt format? snip

What is the threat? A virus? Are you running a system without any
antivirus protection?

You should be able to download and check the file for viruses without
opening it if you are running a virus checker.

Jack

--
Jack Erbes in Ellsworth, Maine, USA - jackerbes at adelphia dot net
(also receiving email at jacker at midmaine.com)

engsol wrote:
I visited the web site...the source code is a dot src file, which I refuse
to open...any one have it in a dot txt format?

type file.src in a DOS box is pretty safe ;-)

Or, use a proper OS or get cygwin and type

od -c filename


-- Kees

I got it to open with wordpad but compiling was a real problem. It would not
compile with MBLAB because a lot of statements were missing operands. For
example bit tests with no second argument. Had to download the TechTools
compiler that he used and it compiled and loaded fine.

--
Glenn Ashmore

I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack
there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com
Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com

"engsol" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:51:36 -0500, "Glenn Ashmore"
wrote:

Anyone ever attempt to build one of these?
http://www.dv-fansler.com/Projects/9.../900gd-dro.htm

I downloaded and compiled the code but would like to know if it is
reliable
before I go to the trouble to design and make the boards. Considering
all
the parts can be had for under $50 and an AutoAnchor cost over $500 it
looks
pretty attractive.


I've used the proximity devices in several projects, and they work
well. They are available from the usual suspects, Allied, Newark, etc.

I visited the web site...the source code is a dot src file, which I refuse
to open...any one have it in a dot txt format? I've looked at a ton of
de-bounce routines, and have invented a pretty fool-proof one. I'm
always curious how others do it.

Norm B

engsol wrote in
:

I visited the web site...the source code is a dot src file, which I
refuse to open...any one have it in a dot txt format? I've looked at a
ton of de-bounce routines, and have invented a pretty fool-proof one.
I'm always curious how others do it.



One of the best things you can do to protect a Windoze computer is to
UNinstall Windows Scripting Host, or whatever new name Billy has morphed it
into to try to make them think XP is "new", not just NT repackaged.....

No scripts can run if it's not on the system to run it.

No Active-X....

No Macromedia products, which have all been hacked, either!

Larry W4CSC wrote:

and I have corrected through judicious snipping

One of the best things you can do to protect a Windoze computer is to
UNinstall Windows.

ahhh...that's better

prodigal1 wrote in :

Larry W4CSC wrote:

and I have corrected through judicious snipping

One of the best things you can do to protect a Windoze computer is to
UNinstall Windows.

ahhh...that's better



The only problems are the alternatives. I use Linux on one computer here.
Nice O/S, works great, but, unfortunately, the hackers writing applications
for it have short attention spans. They get to ver .996b then lose
interest and move on to another, more interesting project, never returning
to finally incorporate all the bug reports into ver 1.0. At least with
Windoze there's enough shareware money coming in to hold their attention to
fixing the bugs. (I'm a shareware payer, by the way.)

I suppose you could buy a Mac, some do, but Apple has always been so
proprietary with their O/S it almost killed the company. Mac, with its
training wheels you can't remove, just isn't worth buying a $200 program to
do something when the same functionality program for Windoze is $29 from
some shareware coder. For that reason, I've never been an Apple fan....

What else do we use, Sun Sparc?...(c;

Larry W4CSC wrote:
prodigal1 wrote in :


Larry W4CSC wrote:

and I have corrected through judicious snipping


One of the best things you can do to protect a Windoze computer is to
UNinstall Windows.

ahhh...that's better




The only problems are the alternatives.

no-no Larry, the alternatives _are_ the solutions

I use Linux on one computer here.
Nice O/S, works great, but, unfortunately, the hackers writing applications
for it have short attention spans...Snip

your perspective is valid, however updating is over-rated. Some of my
Linux boxen are 4 generations "out-of-date", still function perfectly
and are approaching the security through obscurity zone. I've been using
Unix/Linux/Mac for almost 15 years now and quite frankly there is
nothing one can do on a Windows box that you can't do on one of the
alternatives, and have it done in a more robust and secure fashion,
which I think was the gist of your response


I suppose you could buy a Mac, some do, but Apple has always been so
proprietary with their O/S it almost killed the company.

Have you checked Mac's stock performance in the last 6 months? I was
snoozin'...I be losin'

Mac, with its
training wheels you can't remove,

give it another look, OSX is really just the 2005 version of circa 1993
OpenStep/NeXTStep which was essentially BSD Unix. Now more than ever,
Mac is the way to go for non-technical people who want their computers
to function like toasters and with the vermin-free Unix OS under the
hood, and the more robust Mac hardware...you do get what you pay for.

In article ,
Larry W4CSC wrote:

prodigal1 wrote in :

Larry W4CSC wrote:

and I have corrected through judicious snipping

One of the best things you can do to protect a Windoze computer is to
UNinstall Windows.

ahhh...that's better



The only problems are the alternatives. I use Linux on one computer here.
Nice O/S, works great, but, unfortunately, the hackers writing applications
for it have short attention spans. They get to ver .996b then lose
interest and move on to another, more interesting project, never returning
to finally incorporate all the bug reports into ver 1.0. At least with
Windoze there's enough shareware money coming in to hold their attention to
fixing the bugs. (I'm a shareware payer, by the way.)

I suppose you could buy a Mac, some do, but Apple has always been so
proprietary with their O/S it almost killed the company. Mac, with its
training wheels you can't remove, just isn't worth buying a $200 program to
do something when the same functionality program for Windoze is $29 from
some shareware coder. For that reason, I've never been an Apple fan....

What else do we use, Sun Sparc?...(c;

Your view of MacOS is about 4 years old, anchored in MacOS-9.
almost everything you said about it has changed dramatically.

MacOS X is a very modern operating system,
open-source Unix at its core, great shareware apps,
and with an exemplary level of quality never seen in
a product from suburban Redmond.

-mo

"Mike O'Dell" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Larry W4CSC wrote:

prodigal1 wrote in :

Larry W4CSC wrote:

and I have corrected through judicious snipping

One of the best things you can do to protect a Windoze computer is to
UNinstall Windows.

ahhh...that's better



The only problems are the alternatives. I use Linux on one computer
here.
Nice O/S, works great, but, unfortunately, the hackers writing
applications
for it have short attention spans. They get to ver .996b then lose
interest and move on to another, more interesting project, never
returning
to finally incorporate all the bug reports into ver 1.0. At least with
Windoze there's enough shareware money coming in to hold their attention
to
fixing the bugs. (I'm a shareware payer, by the way.)

I suppose you could buy a Mac, some do, but Apple has always been so
proprietary with their O/S it almost killed the company. Mac, with its
training wheels you can't remove, just isn't worth buying a $200 program
to
do something when the same functionality program for Windoze is $29 from
some shareware coder. For that reason, I've never been an Apple fan....

What else do we use, Sun Sparc?...(c;

Your view of MacOS is about 4 years old, anchored in MacOS-9.
almost everything you said about it has changed dramatically.

MacOS X is a very modern operating system,
open-source Unix at its core, great shareware apps,
and with an exemplary level of quality never seen in
a product from suburban Redmond.

I spent a week using a Mac this winter. It hung up on the average of twice
a day. My XP machine hasn't hung up in over 1.5 years of almost
24/7 use.

-mo