Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Gert Been" wrote in
: Ehh, talking about "Decent" multiplexers: decent multiplexers have isolated inputs, yours don't. I just connected one of yours to a differential NMEA talker output. I can now hear all NMEA data on my SSB!! While trying to find out what's wrong, I found that all inputs on your multiplexer have the B terminals connected to ground!!! NMEA inputs are supposed to be isolated. Your grounded B terminals on the inputs effectively short-circuit any properly designed talker. Was it that hard to add 50 cents worth of optocouplers? Gert This is one of my pet peeves with most manufacturers. STupid Icom's really expensive M-802 uses a BNC RF connector that only has ONE WIRE and ground to hook the NMEA data to the transceiver for DSC/GMDSS GPS input. They should all be HUNG! If everything had a balanced line like NMEA was designed for, I could probably transmit on HF without tearing up the whole boat's NMEA network....(d^ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message
... This is one of my pet peeves with most manufacturers. STupid Icom's really expensive M-802 uses a BNC RF connector that only has ONE WIRE and ground to hook the NMEA data to the transceiver for DSC/GMDSS GPS input. They should all be HUNG! If everything had a balanced line like NMEA was designed for, I could probably transmit on HF without tearing up the whole boat's NMEA network....(d^ I agree completely. NMEA should have simply revoked membership of anyone not adhering to the standard. The NMEA-0183 spec is very clear on the naming of the terminals, what signals they should carry and the required isolation on every input. So if everyone adhered to the standard, connecting NMEA would have been as easy as connecting a ligthbulb..... Meindert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Meindert Sprang" wrote in
: So if everyone adhered to the standard, connecting NMEA would have been as easy as connecting a ligthbulb..... Meindert An all multiplexers should use STANDARDIZED SHIELDED CONNECTORS, not some open screw terminals just waiting for something to touch them.......grrrr.....(c; |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message
... "Meindert Sprang" wrote in : So if everyone adhered to the standard, connecting NMEA would have been as easy as connecting a ligthbulb..... Meindert An all multiplexers should use STANDARDIZED SHIELDED CONNECTORS, not some open screw terminals just waiting for something to touch them.......grrrr.....(c; Yeah Yeah..... When you are installing this stuff for living, you very soon learn to appreciate the absence of fixed connectors on cables..... or do you want to make all holes in bulkeads bug enough for all connectors to push through..... just once..... Meindert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:02:18 +0100, "Meindert Sprang" wrote:
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Meindert Sprang" wrote in : So if everyone adhered to the standard, connecting NMEA would have been as easy as connecting a ligthbulb..... Meindert An all multiplexers should use STANDARDIZED SHIELDED CONNECTORS, not some open screw terminals just waiting for something to touch them.......grrrr.....(c; Yeah Yeah..... When you are installing this stuff for living, you very soon learn to appreciate the absence of fixed connectors on cables..... or do you want to make all holes in bulkeads bug enough for all connectors to push through..... just once..... Meindert Am I over looking something? Can't the cable be routed, then the connectors installed? Might make a neater installation, avoiding coils of excess cable....or cables which might be too short. Norm B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"engsol" wrote in message
... On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:02:18 +0100, "Meindert Sprang" wrote: When you are installing this stuff for living, you very soon learn to appreciate the absence of fixed connectors on cables..... or do you want to make all holes in bulkeads bug enough for all connectors to push through..... just once..... Meindert Am I over looking something? Can't the cable be routed, then the connectors installed? Might make a neater installation, avoiding coils of excess cable....or cables which might be too short. No, you're not overlooking. But it just feels plain stupid to first cut the plugs, route the cables and then reassemble them. What would you like to do most: solder a plug with tiny contacts or just strip the wire, crimp on a pin and screw them into a screw terminal? And believe me, it's not just theory but this is backed up with measurements: a 4800 baud signal is just not going to produce interference because the last inch is not screened and connected to screw terminals. They are physically too small to be able to radiate enough energy to interfere with an SSB. Meindert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:25:40 +0100, "Meindert Sprang" wrote:
"engsol" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:02:18 +0100, "Meindert Sprang" wrote: When you are installing this stuff for living, you very soon learn to appreciate the absence of fixed connectors on cables..... or do you want to make all holes in bulkeads bug enough for all connectors to push through..... just once..... Meindert Am I over looking something? Can't the cable be routed, then the connectors installed? Might make a neater installation, avoiding coils of excess cable....or cables which might be too short. No, you're not overlooking. But it just feels plain stupid to first cut the plugs, route the cables and then reassemble them. What would you like to do most: solder a plug with tiny contacts or just strip the wire, crimp on a pin and screw them into a screw terminal? And believe me, it's not just theory but this is backed up with measurements: a 4800 baud signal is just not going to produce interference because the last inch is not screened and connected to screw terminals. They are physically too small to be able to radiate enough energy to interfere with an SSB. Meindert Yep, soldering tiny pins is no fun. I agree 100% that 'strip n crimp' is the way to go. When I was doing embedded controllers for ag equipment, I used 3M plastic circular mating connectors. They had the advantage of strain relief and some protection from dust and moisture, to say nothing of accidential shorting. As to 4800 baud radiating for 1 inch unshielded...not much chance of that. The only exception might be if the rise time of the pulses was quick enough...often seen in switching power supplies....to cause the old 'comb' of harmonics. Norm B |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Have you priced a crimping machine that is capable of dealing with most
reasonable moisture proof connectors? Doug "engsol" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:02:18 +0100, "Meindert Sprang" wrote: "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Meindert Sprang" wrote in : So if everyone adhered to the standard, connecting NMEA would have been as easy as connecting a ligthbulb..... Meindert An all multiplexers should use STANDARDIZED SHIELDED CONNECTORS, not some open screw terminals just waiting for something to touch them.......grrrr.....(c; Yeah Yeah..... When you are installing this stuff for living, you very soon learn to appreciate the absence of fixed connectors on cables..... or do you want to make all holes in bulkeads bug enough for all connectors to push through..... just once..... Meindert Am I over looking something? Can't the cable be routed, then the connectors installed? Might make a neater installation, avoiding coils of excess cable....or cables which might be too short. Norm B |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in
: Have you priced a crimping machine that is capable of dealing with most reasonable moisture proof connectors? Doug There aren't any "moisture proof connectors" on any NMEA crap I ever had....just wires hanging out of a box or screw terminals on a box.... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GpsMap 276C NMEA Interface Problem | Electronics | |||
Wireless 802.11 NMEA server | Electronics | |||
Essentials of a Marine Boat Alarm System | Electronics | |||
NMEA mutiplexer | Electronics | |||
NMEA Noise in SSB | Electronics |