Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
keel stepped/deck stepped masts
Steven Shelikoff wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:44:47 GMT, Rich Hampel wrote: I'm not so sure about that. If, when there are sideloads in squalls, knockdowns, etc., the deck stepped mast failed by remining in one piece but slipping out of it's step, then I'd agree that a keel stepped mast would solve that problem ... if it didn't snap at the deck. But most of the mast failures I've see are when it snaps somewhere aloft, like at the spreaders. How it's stepped doesn't make a difference when it breaks up there. Mast failure (usually at midsection) is usually due to some rigging failure that permits the mast to move 'out of column' and permits catastrophic buckling failure when the compressional loads get off center. Doesnt matter if its deck stepped of keel stepped, if the rigging support fails and the mast deflects catastrophically .... the latent compression load finishes the job. Exactly. Which is why I don't think it makes all that much difference. Steve When my SC22 mast folded into a right angle and spiked into the water beside the boat, it was because there was no compression box inside the mast at the point where the spreader was through bolted. When I built up a new mast from the extrusion, I put a piece of square aluminium tube inside for the bolt to pass through. I positioned it with a long stick and duct tape which tore off once I had secured the box with 2 pop rivets one above, one below, one on each side, just there to retain it in place when the spraeader bolt was removed. I had single lowers, as installed by South Coast. I do not know if the mast was original factory equipment or not. The side load in a gust caused the spreader and lower shroud mast tang stresses to crush the mast at that point. I was watching it when it went. We salvaged the mast lashed it alongside and rescued the mainsail, there was no other damage except the tabernacle was partially torn off the deck and bent somewhat. Lack of a compression box at the spreaders is the most common failure in design that I know of. Check your spreader mounts. Mast pumping may have been the root cause, the final straw, so to speak. Keel stepped mast / deck partners migh have prevented some of that, while providing a fulcrum to develop gooseneck loads and crush the mast at the partners in a manner different from those expressed in a deck stepped system without them. It seems to me that the main difference between deck and keel steps in some boats is that the tabernacle bolts passing through the deck might shear, as most of them seem relatively flimsy. The tabernacle would never let the mast base get away, as it was all secured together with bolts. A wad of 1/2 round convex bog faired all around the base of the tabernacle might help, there. Terry K |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
From swing keel to fixed keel | Boat Building | |||
San Juan 21 swing keel problem | Boat Building | |||
Adjustable keel | Cruising | |||
C&C Corvette Floor and Keel Questions | Boat Building |