Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
About 15 years ago a friend had an aluminum vessel ~40' designed by Tanton,
a French naval architect who lives in this area (or at least did at that time). Tanton insisted that the mast be keel stepped. The issue he was concerned about was mast pumping. If a deck stepped mast starts to pump it can theoretically jump out of the step. How the mast gets into this mode, I don't know. Now, this boat was for blue water, and this friend has sailed around the world at least once. As far as I know, he still has the boat. I also had an Aluminum vessel that was French designed and built. The mast was deck stepped. Bill "QLW" wrote in message ... Steve, As I suspected, my Engineer Friend went on in great detail to explain why stepping the mast on the deck or on the keel has no effect on the strength of the mast in compression. While some small benefit could conceivably be gained by helping to keep the mast in column, he claimed that would only occur in the case of a flawed design. If the mast were stepped on a poorly supported deck then all of the thinking changes...but that's a deck problem not a mast problem. Good reasons for either stepping the mast on the keel or on the deck can be argued, but compressive strength is not one of them. "Steve Christensen" wrote in message ... In article , QLW says... "Tom Dacon" wrote in message ... It's a mechanical engineering issue. A mast (called a column by mechanical engineers) that's supported only at the ends is less strong in compression than a column that's supported at two points at one end. The support at the mast step, for a keel-stepped mast, allows the mast to take more compression before failing than a deck-stepped mast can. Because the stays and shrouds take sailing loads almost parallel to the mast, the mast column comes under significant compression load. While I like the idea of a keel stepped mast, I'm skeptical about the reasoning above. I'm not an engineer but I have a good friend that is...and he has a lot of aircract and boat design experience...so I'll run this thread by him this afternoon and get his input before saying more. I hope your friend agrees with the above post, since this IS the accepted wisdom wrt rigs. Deck stepped masts get less support than keel stepped masts. Therefore the deck stepped mast must be larger - and heavier - in cross section to make up for it. It's always an option, but it adds weight aloft. Steve Christensen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
From swing keel to fixed keel | Boat Building | |||
San Juan 21 swing keel problem | Boat Building | |||
Adjustable keel | Cruising | |||
C&C Corvette Floor and Keel Questions | Boat Building |