Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 17, 2:20*pm, Bruce in alaska wrote:
... Just about ALL commercial Vessels use 16 for Calling, no matter where they are in the world. It is what Channel 16 was meant to be used for, and why ALL commercial vessels are required to maintain a Watch on Channel 16 while navigating, no matter the size of the vessel. ... Yes but there are important exceptions. In many places in the US of A commercial vessels maintain a watch on 13 & VTS and do not watch 16. See 33 CFR 26 particularly 26.04 (d). This is unfortunate and can be confusing but if your life depends on getting in touch with a tug here in SF Bay you better call on 13. -- Tom. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Jul 17, 2:20 pm, Bruce in alaska wrote: .... Just about ALL commercial Vessels use 16 for Calling, no matter where they are in the world. It is what Channel 16 was meant to be used for, and why ALL commercial vessels are required to maintain a Watch on Channel 16 while navigating, no matter the size of the vessel. ... Yes but there are important exceptions. In many places in the US of A commercial vessels maintain a watch on 13 & VTS and do not watch 16. See 33 CFR 26 particularly 26.04 (d). This is unfortunate and can be confusing but if your life depends on getting in touch with a tug here in SF Bay you better call on 13. -- Tom. Yes... there have been a couple of incidents where people didn't do this and had problems. Monitor 14, hail on 13. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, " wrote: On Jul 17, 2:20*pm, Bruce in alaska wrote: ... Just about ALL commercial Vessels use 16 for Calling, no matter where they are in the world. It is what Channel 16 was meant to be used for, and why ALL commercial vessels are required to maintain a Watch on Channel 16 while navigating, no matter the size of the vessel. ... Yes but there are important exceptions. In many places in the US of A commercial vessels maintain a watch on 13 & VTS and do not watch 16. See 33 CFR 26 particularly 26.04 (d). This is unfortunate and can be confusing but if your life depends on getting in touch with a tug here in SF Bay you better call on 13. -- Tom. Well actually, if a vessel is REQUIRED to be under VTS Control, then they are exempt from maintaining a Watch on Ch 16 while under VTS Control, but the VTS System Operators are then responsible to forward any Distress or Safety Traffic to ALL vessels under their control. Any Navigation Traffic would be passed on the Bridge to Bridge Channel 13. Once you understand that ALL Vessels over 20 Meters in length, or Towing, are Required to comply with the Bridge to Bridge Radiotelephone Act, which requires a continuous Watch on Vhf Ch. 13 while the vessel is Navigating. Then if you are near a VTS System, as a Voluntary Equipped Vessel would use Ch 13 to pass any Navigation Traffic to a VTS controlled Vessel. Traffic going from a VTS controlled vessel to a voluntary Equipped Vessel would use the VTS Channel Radio to temporarily move to Ch 16 for calling, and move to Ch 13 for working the voluntary Equipped Vessel. Most Bridge to Bridge REQUIRED Vessels have a Third VHF Fitted just to relieve the above situation, and as a Hot Standby Spare, should one of the other REQUIRED Radios Fail. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, in message
Bruce in alaska wrote: Having been in the Radio Regulation Enforcement Biz for many years, it never ceases to amaze me, what folks think, and say about, how Maritime Mobile Radio is supposed to work, and why things are they way they are. In my neck of the woods (Eastern Lake Ontario) 16 remains the only calling channel. (and Canadian marinas monitor 68) I used to have a VHF station license for my boat, but dropped it when the local requirement went away. Somebody recently suggested to me that I would need a station license to legitimately operate my radio (on a Canadian registered vessel) in US waters. I do have an operator's license. Do I need more to be legit in the US? Ryk |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ryk wrote in
: Do I need more to be legit in the US? Let's make a deal. You get your bureaucrats to stop forcing us to buy an expensive ship license just to go to Canada......and we'll get our bureaucrats to stop forcing you to buy an expensive ship license just to go to Florida. Deal? One of the benefits of the "New World Order" finally creating the North American Union will be "local" will be all the way to the southern tip of Mexico and our Ameros will all be the same money. No license will be necessary for any NAU ship in this hemisphere.... |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ryk wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, in message Bruce in alaska wrote: Having been in the Radio Regulation Enforcement Biz for many years, it never ceases to amaze me, what folks think, and say about, how Maritime Mobile Radio is supposed to work, and why things are they way they are. In my neck of the woods (Eastern Lake Ontario) 16 remains the only calling channel. (and Canadian marinas monitor 68) I used to have a VHF station license for my boat, but dropped it when the local requirement went away. Somebody recently suggested to me that I would need a station license to legitimately operate my radio (on a Canadian registered vessel) in US waters. I do have an operator's license. Do I need more to be legit in the US? Ryk Yes, to legally operate your VHF Radio in US Waters you are REQUIRED by International Convention (ITU International Telecommunication Union) to have a current Radio Station License issued by the Country of your FLAG. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:39:29 -0400, Ryk wrote:
In my neck of the woods (Eastern Lake Ontario) 16 remains the only calling channel. ???!? 16 a calling channel in Canada for pleasure boaters? I don't think so Ryk. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, Bruce in alaska said: I'm talking real world here. The world of gummint regulations is different. Do you really use 16 to hail other boats up there? [snip] Weekend Warriors are NOT the largest users of Maritime Radios on this planet, contrary to popular belief Perhaps I should have phrased the question with more specificity. Didn't think it was necessary given the name of the group. So let's try again: Do pleasure boaters generally use 16 to hail other boats up there? How do you tell? I think these days people use their cell phones. They could use Nextel and pretend their walkie-talkies. "Got your ears on good buddy?" -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ions,
"Capt. JG" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, Bruce in alaska said: I'm talking real world here. The world of gummint regulations is different. Do you really use 16 to hail other boats up there? [snip] Weekend Warriors are NOT the largest users of Maritime Radios on this planet, contrary to popular belief Perhaps I should have phrased the question with more specificity. Didn't think it was necessary given the name of the group. So let's try again: Do pleasure boaters generally use 16 to hail other boats up there? How do you tell? I think these days people use their cell phones. They could use Nextel and pretend their walkie-talkies. "Got your ears on good buddy?" You listen to the Traffic on Channel 16, Channel 9, and having done so as a Regulator in the past, knowing what to listen for. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, Bruce in alaska said: I'm talking real world here. The world of gummint regulations is different. Do you really use 16 to hail other boats up there? [snip] Weekend Warriors are NOT the largest users of Maritime Radios on this planet, contrary to popular belief Perhaps I should have phrased the question with more specificity. Didn't think it was necessary given the name of the group. So let's try again: Do pleasure boaters generally use 16 to hail other boats up there? Since "Pleasure boaters" are a small minority of vessels navigating the alaskan waters, YES, they usually do their calling on VHF Ch 16, UNLESS it is to call a Traveling Mate vessel on a prearranged Channel, like VHF Ch 9. All the local Harbor Masters monitor Ch 16, as well as their working Channel, which in my area is Ch 9. I just spent the last three days listening to the USCG Cutter Liberty, doing boardings of "Pleasure boats" out in Icy Straights, and they did ALL their calling on Ch 16, and working on Ch 22A. Only heard one guy, who couldn't figure out how to switch to 22A, and they did work him on Ch 9, after convincing him that Ch 16 was not the place to communicate traffic. He also failed the Boarding Inspection, and is now tied up to My Dock, as the closest Port of Call, waiting for a package from town, to fullfill his lack of Emergency Flares and a Whistle. Amazing for a $250K "Pleasure boat".... Had a nice chat with the CPO, at the Port Captian's Office for Southeastern Alaska, about what it would take to send this fellow on his way. As soon as Possible. Don't want him pumping his bilge at my dock, either by accident or on purpose. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Among the first signs of insanity is... | ASA | |||
Among the first signs of insanity is... | ASA | |||
Signs of Our Times | General | |||
Emergency marine radio - aviation 121.5 radio in a pinch? | General |