Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Jul 17, 2:20 pm, Bruce in alaska wrote: .... Just about ALL commercial Vessels use 16 for Calling, no matter where they are in the world. It is what Channel 16 was meant to be used for, and why ALL commercial vessels are required to maintain a Watch on Channel 16 while navigating, no matter the size of the vessel. ... Yes but there are important exceptions. In many places in the US of A commercial vessels maintain a watch on 13 & VTS and do not watch 16. See 33 CFR 26 particularly 26.04 (d). This is unfortunate and can be confusing but if your life depends on getting in touch with a tug here in SF Bay you better call on 13. -- Tom. Yes... there have been a couple of incidents where people didn't do this and had problems. Monitor 14, hail on 13. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:01:13 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: wrote in message ... On Jul 17, 2:20 pm, Bruce in alaska wrote: ... Just about ALL commercial Vessels use 16 for Calling, no matter where they are in the world. It is what Channel 16 was meant to be used for, and why ALL commercial vessels are required to maintain a Watch on Channel 16 while navigating, no matter the size of the vessel. ... Yes but there are important exceptions. In many places in the US of A commercial vessels maintain a watch on 13 & VTS and do not watch 16. See 33 CFR 26 particularly 26.04 (d). This is unfortunate and can be confusing but if your life depends on getting in touch with a tug here in SF Bay you better call on 13. -- Tom. Yes... there have been a couple of incidents where people didn't do this and had problems. Monitor 14, hail on 13. I thought channel 13 was officially designated for bridge to bridge traffic. Bridges of ships, and the operators of those spans over the river. Why would you monitor 14 if the hailing will be on 13? Ship to VTS comm. is on 14 on the bay. Commercial vessels hail "traffic" and that's nice to monitor. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, Bruce in alaska said: I'm talking real world here. The world of gummint regulations is different. Do you really use 16 to hail other boats up there? [snip] Weekend Warriors are NOT the largest users of Maritime Radios on this planet, contrary to popular belief Perhaps I should have phrased the question with more specificity. Didn't think it was necessary given the name of the group. So let's try again: Do pleasure boaters generally use 16 to hail other boats up there? How do you tell? I think these days people use their cell phones. They could use Nextel and pretend their walkie-talkies. "Got your ears on good buddy?" -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, in message
Bruce in alaska wrote: Having been in the Radio Regulation Enforcement Biz for many years, it never ceases to amaze me, what folks think, and say about, how Maritime Mobile Radio is supposed to work, and why things are they way they are. In my neck of the woods (Eastern Lake Ontario) 16 remains the only calling channel. (and Canadian marinas monitor 68) I used to have a VHF station license for my boat, but dropped it when the local requirement went away. Somebody recently suggested to me that I would need a station license to legitimately operate my radio (on a Canadian registered vessel) in US waters. I do have an operator's license. Do I need more to be legit in the US? Ryk |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ryk wrote in
: Do I need more to be legit in the US? Let's make a deal. You get your bureaucrats to stop forcing us to buy an expensive ship license just to go to Canada......and we'll get our bureaucrats to stop forcing you to buy an expensive ship license just to go to Florida. Deal? One of the benefits of the "New World Order" finally creating the North American Union will be "local" will be all the way to the southern tip of Mexico and our Ameros will all be the same money. No license will be necessary for any NAU ship in this hemisphere.... |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amazing. This whole long thread and the original question never got
answered, or, if it did, I missed it. Let me rephrase and see if I can get an answer I was wondering about. I have the licences because I plan to take my VHF to Canada and yack on it there. I therefore have a call sign other than my boat registration number. Question: Should I use the radio call sign instead of the boat registration? I suspect, and what I will do unless someone tells me different, is use the boat registration in US waters because this is what is expected and is most in line with the licensing regime. Once in Canadian waters where the applicabile regulations require the ship station and operators' licences, thus the call sign, I will switch over to using the callsign. Question: Does this make sense? -- Roger Long |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 18, 11:30*am, "Roger Long" wrote:
... I suspect, and what I will do unless someone tells me different, is use the boat registration in US waters because this is what is expected and is most in line with the licensing regime. *Once in Canadian waters where the applicabile regulations require the ship station and operators' licences, thus the call sign, I will switch over to using the callsign. Question: Does this make sense? ... I have a license and I always use vessel name followed by call sign both US and foreign. That's the way the pro's do it, too. I can't imagine anyone having a problem with it or preferring the rego to the call sign. -- Tom. |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That probably does make more sense and avoids switching procedures at a time
when there is apt to be a lot else on your mind. Also, not giving out the registration which anyone can read on the dock provides a little anonymity. I can't recall ever hearing any yacht giving either, come to think of it. -- Roger Long |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... Ryk wrote in : Do I need more to be legit in the US? Let's make a deal. You get your bureaucrats to stop forcing us to buy an expensive ship license just to go to Canada......and we'll get our bureaucrats to stop forcing you to buy an expensive ship license just to go to Florida. Deal? One of the benefits of the "New World Order" finally creating the North American Union will be "local" will be all the way to the southern tip of Mexico and our Ameros will all be the same money. No license will be necessary for any NAU ship in this hemisphere.... Hi Larry. Maybe you can answer this one for me. I imported my boat from USA and it was equipped with a nice little Standard Horizon Eclipse + VHF set. Over here you need a licence to use VHF even on a pleasure boat and they refused to licence this set for me, saying that it had 'American channels' on it and could not be licenced in Europe. I had to state on my licence application exactly what set I was using and.had to replace it with a locally approved ICOM set. I had powered up the Standard Horizon and channel 16 seemed to be the same and all the other channels had familiar numbers. I found no problem picking up ship-to ship traffic either. Certainly there were some additional channels, which I gather were weather channels, which were unfamiliar to me... Are the niumbered channels the same everywhere, even if in different areas their designated usage may vary? Do you think they were unreasonable to make me take this set out? ... |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ryk wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, in message Bruce in alaska wrote: Having been in the Radio Regulation Enforcement Biz for many years, it never ceases to amaze me, what folks think, and say about, how Maritime Mobile Radio is supposed to work, and why things are they way they are. In my neck of the woods (Eastern Lake Ontario) 16 remains the only calling channel. (and Canadian marinas monitor 68) I used to have a VHF station license for my boat, but dropped it when the local requirement went away. Somebody recently suggested to me that I would need a station license to legitimately operate my radio (on a Canadian registered vessel) in US waters. I do have an operator's license. Do I need more to be legit in the US? Ryk Yes, to legally operate your VHF Radio in US Waters you are REQUIRED by International Convention (ITU International Telecommunication Union) to have a current Radio Station License issued by the Country of your FLAG. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Among the first signs of insanity is... | ASA | |||
Among the first signs of insanity is... | ASA | |||
Signs of Our Times | General | |||
Emergency marine radio - aviation 121.5 radio in a pinch? | General |