"Larry" wrote in message
...

snip....
Can they blind everyone with bull****?



"There are none so blind as those who will not see".

On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:28:06 +0000, Larry wrote:

Before 9/11/2001, not a single steel reinforce building every collapsed
from a fire, even fires that went on for days consuming the whole building!

That is not true. Steel frames collapse in building fires all the
time. Additionally, any number of highway overpass bridges have been
structurally damaged by tanker truck fires weakening the steel.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
"Capt. JG" wrote in news:13qq9enr3ksr163
@corp.supernews.com:

McCain.


32nd degree Freemason. He's qualified for the bankers to love.

A good officer, he'll do what the bankers tell him to. He's used to
taking
orders...same as Bush.

http://www.cfr.org/bios/662/john_mccain.html
Oh, look! The CFR's own boy! McCain my ass....
http://blogs.cfr.org/campaign2008/

Which CFR/Freemason will YOU vote for?




My father. He's a 32nd degree.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Larry" wrote in message
...
Stephen Trapani wrote in news:dncrj.3116
:

Any reason saboteurs trying to secretly collapse buildings would go to
great trouble to make them "collapse in their footprint" like a
controlled demolition?

The WTC was an awful white elephant. It was losing millions/day and was
lightly occupied. The buildings around WTC are owned by powerful people
with a lot to lose if the building just fell over. Why would they want
the
WTC to collapse straight down, including Building 7?

Would saboteurs care? Of course not! They'd want to take out as many
buildings as the WTC towers could reach! You answered your own question,
they came straight down to MINIMIZE DAMAGE to some very rich corporations.

This also holds true at the Pentagram. Why would an Arab terrorist, who
was headed into the Pentagram on the side where the JCS and Rumsfeld's
office was located right behind the flagpole....FLY ALL THE WAY AROUND THE
OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO FLY IT INTO AN AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH
NO PENTAGRAM BUREAUCRATS TO KILL?! If you wanted to take out the top of
the American military machine, wouldn't the nose of that jet want to point
right into Rumsfeld's office window?

They took out the only part of the Pentagram UNDER CONSTRUCTION to
MINIMIZE
BUREAUCRAT DAMAGE.....only construction workers were killed. No top
brass,
not a single colonel was harmed in the attack! What a great coincidence,
eh? The location of the JCS and Rumsfeld's office is on thousands of
websites across the net. ANY terrorist going to this much trouble would
know EXACTLY which window was his.....and blow it to hell!



It was the Jews. They needed the money. Good grief... get over it. You're
sounding pretty desperate to make your case.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 20:34:08 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
...
Does a bear crap in the woods?


Bruce... get it right...

The Pope craps in the woods. The bear is Catholic.

Well, I never got that close to a bear I could tell whether he had a
set of beads or not.. course I never got close to the Pope either...


Bruce-in-Bangkok
(Note:remove underscores
from address for reply)

You're all wrong! It's WHERE does a bear go in the woods? Ans:
Anywhere he wants!
G

Hunters and hikers carry fine steel wool for starting fires. Don't
believe it? Take some really fine steel wool and put a match to it. Presto!
Gordon

Larry wrote:


Referring to the Pentagon as the Pentagram surely reinforces your case
that you are a well balanced citizen who is concerned about some history.

-paul

On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:12:05 -0800, Stephen Trapani
wrote:

Any reason saboteurs trying to secretly collapse buildings would go to
great trouble to make them "collapse in their footprint" like a
controlled demolition?

Everything always falls straight down. That is the direction the force
of gravity acts. What do you think fall means?

Casady

Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:12:05 -0800, Stephen Trapani
wrote:

Any reason saboteurs trying to secretly collapse buildings would go to
great trouble to make them "collapse in their footprint" like a
controlled demolition?

Everything always falls straight down. That is the direction the force
of gravity acts. What do you think fall means?

Do you have any idea how much trouble demolition experts have to go to
to make buildings "fall in their footprint?" Tall buildings don't
crumple straight down. No one on earth, including all the designers of
the building knew that you could cause an explosion and fire that high
up in the towers and they would collapse, let alone collapse roughly
straight down and take out the rest of the building as it collapses.

Stephen

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:19:26 -0800, cavalamb himself
wrote:

Larry wrote:


Larry, I always though you had a better grasp of the techincal issues.

No..