Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
rhys
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sailing the Hunter 336 long distance

Wow. An honest man. Most guys would like to pretend the boat they
chose to buy is Absolutely the Best Thing Going In All Sea States.

You seem, by contrast, refreshingly realistic.

I have got flak on occasion for being crtical in print of a lot of
today's designs for ignoring things like excessive beam, proper
backing of deck gear, excessive freeboard, and so on. I've been
accused of only liking dark, dank and narrow older designs.

On the contrary, I like designs that won't kill me and will sail
effectively. I am sure your Hunter does that admirably in the
conditions in which you sail. I dock beside a Hunter 336 (I have a '73
Viking 33, which is exactly the same length) and the contrast is
stunning. My boat looks like a pup tent next to a condo. I see (and
hear) quite a bit of partying on the Hunter next slip over, but I
think I miss most of it....I'm usually off sailing.

Glad to hear you are, too.

R.

On 9 Feb 2004 12:24:35 -0800, (Paul) wrote:

I own a Hunter 336. They are fine as coastal cruisers, but aren't
really designed for offshore use.

That doesn't mean you can't take one offshore, people are sailing
around out there right now in leaky 24-footers. But I wouldn't take
mine any further than the occasional trek out into Block Island Sound.

That stuff about the thickness of the hull and the placement of the
stringers doesn't mean much to me. The cheapest fiberglass boat has
enough hull strength, fiberglass is tremendously strong compared to
its predecessor, wood.

But, this Hunter doesn't have a through-bolted hull and deck joint. It
isn't made to heel in a blow, there's too much freeboard. I don't
think that the deck fittings are adequately backed to stake your life
on them.

There are boats that cost the same, a little older probably, that
maybe aren't as cushy in port, that would do much better in a seaway.

And, the boat doesn't need a backstay. It's fairly easy to prove that
tripod rigs are *stronger* than conventional rigs because of reduced
catenary forces. However, I think that no-backstay rigs are a pain in
the ass and I'd never have one again.

Just my opinion, I could be wrong.

Paul


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
History of the American Sailing Navy - 1949 - Chapelle DuLaze Boat Building 0 June 17th 04 04:10 PM
Motor Boat Sailing Oke Fami Boat Building 4 April 21st 04 08:45 PM
"The SEARCH" redux (long, as usual) Skip Gundlach Cruising 2 September 22nd 03 03:30 PM
Long Distance carrier for cruisers? J K General 0 September 1st 03 04:25 PM
long vs. extra long shaft nortyler Cruising 7 August 28th 03 02:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017