Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I own a Hunter 336. They are fine as coastal cruisers, but aren't
really designed for offshore use. That doesn't mean you can't take one offshore, people are sailing around out there right now in leaky 24-footers. But I wouldn't take mine any further than the occasional trek out into Block Island Sound. That stuff about the thickness of the hull and the placement of the stringers doesn't mean much to me. The cheapest fiberglass boat has enough hull strength, fiberglass is tremendously strong compared to its predecessor, wood. But, this Hunter doesn't have a through-bolted hull and deck joint. It isn't made to heel in a blow, there's too much freeboard. I don't think that the deck fittings are adequately backed to stake your life on them. There are boats that cost the same, a little older probably, that maybe aren't as cushy in port, that would do much better in a seaway. And, the boat doesn't need a backstay. It's fairly easy to prove that tripod rigs are *stronger* than conventional rigs because of reduced catenary forces. However, I think that no-backstay rigs are a pain in the ass and I'd never have one again. Just my opinion, I could be wrong. Paul |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
History of the American Sailing Navy - 1949 - Chapelle | Boat Building | |||
Motor Boat Sailing | Boat Building | |||
"The SEARCH" redux (long, as usual) | Cruising | |||
Long Distance carrier for cruisers? | General | |||
long vs. extra long shaft | Cruising |