![]() |
Useful gadgets
Dave wrote:
"Armond Perretta" said Dave wrote: Armond wrote: Any person who regularly operates ... without radar in ... decreased visibility (and I include ... darkness in this category) is ... taking the position that "its up to the other guy to avoid me." As to darkness, nonsense. That's why vessels have running lights. When was the last time you saw a rock with running lights ... ? When was the last time you saw a submerged [sic] rock on radar? ... Who said anything about "submerged"? -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com |
Useful gadgets
|
Useful gadgets
|
Useful gadgets
then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?
I probably spend more time as radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year. indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with radar, as witness your statement below: nor uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running, Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick up added sea return in a specific area |
Useful gadgets
then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?
I probably spend more time as radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year. indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with radar, as witness your statement below: nor uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running, Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick up added sea return in a specific area |
Useful gadgets
ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your
intelligence or reading comprehension. JAXAshby wrote: then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar? LOL I probably spend more time as radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year. indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with radar, as witness your statement below: nor uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running, Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick up added sea return in a specific area ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence. ...... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having flat water. ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed, inexperienced, to be out in public. Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post. otn |
Useful gadgets
ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your
intelligence or reading comprehension. JAXAshby wrote: then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar? LOL I probably spend more time as radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year. indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with radar, as witness your statement below: nor uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running, Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick up added sea return in a specific area ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence. ...... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having flat water. ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed, inexperienced, to be out in public. Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post. otn |
Useful gadgets
no you don't see, no matter what you may feel you think.
ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your intelligence or reading comprehension. JAXAshby wrote: then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar? LOL I probably spend more time as radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year. indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with radar, as witness your statement below: nor uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running, Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick up added sea return in a specific area ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence. ..... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having flat water. ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed, inexperienced, to be out in public. Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post. otn |
Useful gadgets
no you don't see, no matter what you may feel you think.
ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your intelligence or reading comprehension. JAXAshby wrote: then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar? LOL I probably spend more time as radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year. indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with radar, as witness your statement below: nor uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running, Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick up added sea return in a specific area ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence. ..... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having flat water. ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed, inexperienced, to be out in public. Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post. otn |
Useful gadgets
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com