![]() |
Useful gadgets
DSK wrote in message ...
Parallax wrote: In fog, or at least when I see it coming, I take a quick bearing so I know where I am, note my course and get out of the channel if any and put up the radar reflector ... Armond Perretta wrote: You cannot know where you _are_ with a single bearing. You can, however, get a good idea of where you are _not_. If you're right on the edge of amarked channel, an EP + depth + bearing would give a pretty good fix. My question is, how can you rely on taking a useful bearing in fog, or even if a fog is approaching? I rarely see other traffic where I sail but in fog I sound the horn and sit it out, sometimes for hours ... Sounding the horn while "sitting it out" is a violation of the COLREGS. Use a bell at anchor, and a horn underway. Make sure you study the sound signals that apply to your specific situation and to your particular vessel. Two points, still in play ;) I still think Radar is just an expensive gadget for a small (28') sailboat.... If you ask a fisherman's opinion about this, you may get an enlightening perspective (isn't that what "Parallax" is about anyway?). Any person who regularly operates a vessel without radar in situations of decreased visibility (and I include rain and darkness in this category) is in essence taking the position that "its up to the other guy to avoid me." I can see his point, but really the question is not "is radar *just* an expensive gadget" but rather would a radar be useful enough (in the context of boat, location, and type of sailing) to warrant the expense & complication? In New England, I'd say yes with no reservations. Too much traffic out there and fog too often. Plus it is a very handy navigational tool. In my own case, I mostly sail in the southeast where there is not as much traffic, shores are low & soft, and fog is rare. Furthermore, I never had a boat with radar until two years ago, and never sailed with anybody who had it who knew enough about it to make it a useful tool under the circumstances. So I didn't think radar was all that hot, either. Having made a cruise this past fall in which we spent a good amount of time learning to use our radar, and then going through several incidents that pointed out how useful a tool it can be, I am convinced that it is a great thing to have. It certainly expands the capabilities of the vessel & skipper, *if* the time is spent learning to use it and make it reliable. To simply buy it and assume that possession of it renders one bulletproof is stupid... same could be said of any GPS. Fresh Breezes- Doug King Waaaaaaay too much literalness goin on here. With fog conditions possible, always have a very good idea where you are. This means having a very good idea of your course. This way, with a single LOP and your known course, you can get your position. With sufficient time (and there almost always is) get another LOP. Where I sail (or perhaps when), the density of other vessels is so low that probability of encounters is low. Probability is higher near channels, but I dont spend much time there. The one time I found myself in dense fog in a channel, I made sure I could get out of the channel into shallow water where others normally dont go. Here, if I run aground on an oyster bar, I figure others prob wont follow and its no big deal to me. I'd rather spend time knowing where I am than looking at another silly electronic gadget. |
Useful gadgets
Parallax wrote:
Waaaaaaay too much literalness goin on here. Oh. Sorry. With fog conditions possible, always have a very good idea where you are. Agreed, but then, it's true without fog too. I'd rather spend time knowing where I am than looking at another silly electronic gadget. Sounds to me like you assume that anybody who uses tools you don't have must be silly, or somehow less competent that you. Snobbery is a very limited perspective. Radar is a tool. You might not *need* it, but then, that doesn't mean that it can't be very useful indeed to those who do have it. The more times you find yourself in questionable circumstances, the more useful that tool can be. The fact that so far, you have survived without it, is commendable but doesn't really speak to the issue of whether that tool is useful and might increase safety & reliability. DSK |
Useful gadgets
Parallax wrote:
Waaaaaaay too much literalness goin on here. Oh. Sorry. With fog conditions possible, always have a very good idea where you are. Agreed, but then, it's true without fog too. I'd rather spend time knowing where I am than looking at another silly electronic gadget. Sounds to me like you assume that anybody who uses tools you don't have must be silly, or somehow less competent that you. Snobbery is a very limited perspective. Radar is a tool. You might not *need* it, but then, that doesn't mean that it can't be very useful indeed to those who do have it. The more times you find yourself in questionable circumstances, the more useful that tool can be. The fact that so far, you have survived without it, is commendable but doesn't really speak to the issue of whether that tool is useful and might increase safety & reliability. DSK |
Useful gadgets
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:23:28 -0500, DSK wrote:
Sounds to me like you assume that anybody who uses tools you don't have must be silly, or somehow less competent that you. Snobbery is a very limited perspective. Radar is a tool. You might not *need* it, but then, that doesn't mean that it can't be very useful indeed to those who do have it. The more times you find yourself in questionable circumstances, the more useful that tool can be. The fact that so far, you have survived without it, is commendable but doesn't really speak to the issue of whether that tool is useful and might increase safety & reliability. I seem to recall the same argument faced shipboard chronometers in the 18th century. After all, a perfectly good "lunar" method of determining longitude already existed and was backed by the Astronomer Royal...the fact that it took several hours of fairly advanced math to calculate presented no problems...on land. Use what you need. The reasons are your own. R. |
Useful gadgets
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:23:28 -0500, DSK wrote:
Sounds to me like you assume that anybody who uses tools you don't have must be silly, or somehow less competent that you. Snobbery is a very limited perspective. Radar is a tool. You might not *need* it, but then, that doesn't mean that it can't be very useful indeed to those who do have it. The more times you find yourself in questionable circumstances, the more useful that tool can be. The fact that so far, you have survived without it, is commendable but doesn't really speak to the issue of whether that tool is useful and might increase safety & reliability. I seem to recall the same argument faced shipboard chronometers in the 18th century. After all, a perfectly good "lunar" method of determining longitude already existed and was backed by the Astronomer Royal...the fact that it took several hours of fairly advanced math to calculate presented no problems...on land. Use what you need. The reasons are your own. R. |
Useful gadgets
Dave wrote:
"Armond Perretta" said: Any person who regularly operates a vessel without radar in situations of decreased visibility (and I include rain and darkness in this category) is in essence taking the position that "its up to the other guy to avoid me." As to darkness, nonsense. That's why vessels have running lights. When was the last time you saw a rock with running lights, "Dave"? -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com |
Useful gadgets
Dave wrote:
"Armond Perretta" said: Any person who regularly operates a vessel without radar in situations of decreased visibility (and I include rain and darkness in this category) is in essence taking the position that "its up to the other guy to avoid me." As to darkness, nonsense. That's why vessels have running lights. When was the last time you saw a rock with running lights, "Dave"? -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com |
Useful gadgets
Parallax wrote:
... With fog conditions possible, always have a very good idea where you are ... Good idea. This means having a very good idea of your course. This way, with a single LOP and your known course, you can get your position ... You need to brush up a little on elementary piloting. Knowing the vessel's "course" and crossing it with a single line of position does _not_ result in a fix. In fact it doesn't even result in an EP. Are you confusing "course" with DR track? -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com |
Useful gadgets
Parallax wrote:
... With fog conditions possible, always have a very good idea where you are ... Good idea. This means having a very good idea of your course. This way, with a single LOP and your known course, you can get your position ... You need to brush up a little on elementary piloting. Knowing the vessel's "course" and crossing it with a single line of position does _not_ result in a fix. In fact it doesn't even result in an EP. Are you confusing "course" with DR track? -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.tripod.com |
Useful gadgets
As to darkness, nonsense. That's why vessels have running lights.
When was the last time you saw a rock with running lights when is the last time you saw an uncharted rock that shows up on radar? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com