Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 9:50 am, Bob wrote:
Hi All: All the talk about the Rocna anchor started me reading and looking. There are some very compelling data the Rocna sets fast and holds well. However, Ive noticed that all the tests Ive seen were all similar sand type bottoms. Here is my question: If anchoring in sand bottoms (hard, loose, sand/mud) why would I chose the Rocna instead of an anchor design specifically for such conditions; Fortress FX series. In other words, Fortress FX or Rocna? Which holds best in sand or mud bottoms? Or is the Rocnca's appeal that it holds adequately in a variety of bottoms? Say, the better crescent wrench (adjustable spanner for you Limeys). bob FYI- While cruising about 10 years ago in mexico, I had a fellow cruiser / scuba diver tell me he was always finding Fortress anchors on the bottom with broken shanks -- that they held fine. However the shank is brittle when pulled sideways or twisted and breaks. He would not use one for that reason. He had no vested interest in any anchor brand at all. Greg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Experience with Rocna anchor ? | Cruising | |||
Fortress anchor | ASA | |||
Fortress Anchors | General | |||
Looking for an anchor that I can store disassembled - other than Fortress? | Cruising | |||
WTB: 44# Bruce or FX-37 Fortress Anchor. S. Florida | Cruising |