On Nov 1, 9:50 am, Bob wrote:
Hi All:

All the talk about the Rocna anchor started me reading and looking.
There are some very compelling data the Rocna sets fast and holds
well. However, Ive noticed that all the tests Ive seen were all
similar sand type bottoms. Here is my question:

If anchoring in sand bottoms (hard, loose, sand/mud) why would I chose
the Rocna instead of an anchor design specifically for such
conditions; Fortress FX series. In other words, Fortress FX or Rocna?
Which holds best in sand or mud bottoms?

Or is the Rocnca's appeal that it holds adequately in a variety of
bottoms? Say, the better crescent wrench (adjustable spanner for you
Limeys).

bob

I'm one of the people who gave glowing support on how well my Rocna
copy (Manson Supreme) has been doing for us. It's a great anchor.
That being said, it let me down while trying to anchor in an area with
a loose sandy bottom. I carry a big danforth (35H) for sandy or soupy
mud bottoms. I also carry a CQR. So while I still think the Rocna
type anchor is the best anchor on my boat, it's important in my
opinion to have more than "one wrench" in the tool box if you have
room in your boat. If I could only carry one anchor, the Rocna type
anchor would be at the top of my list.