| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jeff" wrote in message ... * Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 8/11/2007 8:23 PM: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Rule 5 Lookout Every vessel shall at all times maintain a PROPER LOOKOUT BY SIGHT AND HEARING AS WELL AS BY ALL AVAILABLE MEANS appropriate in the prevailing circumstances and conditions so as to make a full appraisal of the situation and of the risk of collision. Rule 5 This is a basic Rule, the violation of which is so often the cause of small-craft accidents - collisions with other boats or stationary objects. On smaller vessels, the "lookout" is nominally the helmsman, and this is acceptable if he is aware of his responsibility and performs his duties. He must be able to hear as well as see potential dangers. If in doubt, a skipper should post an additional person with the sole duties of lookout; this is particularly necessary in situations of reduced visibility. It is even possible that two lookouts will be necessary - one forward and one aft. Should a collision occur, failure to have a proper lookout would be strongly held against you in court. This is also the Rule that is obviously violated by all single-handing skippers on long voyages, or even on voyages of more than a few hours. Note that the Rule states that a lookout is required "at all times" - this includes when a vessel is at anchor." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sitting at the nav station typing 500 word posts and looking at a RADAR screen every 15 min violates COLREG RULE 5. Get out of the office and sail your boat! Bob One correction, Bob, but don't feel badly because you're not the only one confused by it. Jeff, who posts here regularly, also misunderstands this rule but he's otherwise got them down pat. Rule 5 comes under Part B, "Steering and Sailing Rules" meaning rules for vessels steering and sailing, in other words vessels underway. Underway vessels do not include anchored vessels which, unless they're dragging, they're not underway nor are they steering or sailing. Nope, that's not the way the courts read it. And, although its not discussed much here, captains are not only responsible for knowing the rules as stated in the ColRegs, they are responsible for understanding how the courts have interpreted them. This is an aspect where admiralty law differs from "land based" law. There is a huge amount of information left out of the ColRegs; one must look to the courts for a full understanding of the rules. And of course, one must be familiar with the "ordinary practice of seamen," which certainly leaves you out. There have been a number of cases where anchored vessels have been found at fault for not keeping a lookout. However, they generally involve situations where a vessel anchored in or too close to a channel. And because their lawyers sucked. Probably as stupid as Dave. Rule 5 is clearly listed under Steering and Sailing Rules. Therefore, Rule 5 applies only to vessels engaged in steering and sailing. There is no way a vessel anchored is steering or sailing. What kind of a knucklehead does a judge have to be to misinterpret something this clear? Appeal the damned thing to the SCOTUS. I would. I hate it when judges legislate from the bench in contradiction of written existing laws which even a two-year-old could understand. Wilbur Hubbard |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 11, 6:18 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: Rule 5 comes under Part B, "Steering and Sailing Rules" meaning rules for vessels steering and sailing, in other words vessels underway. Underway vessels do not include anchored vessels which, unless they're dragging, they're not underway nor are they steering or sailing. I can not agree with you on this one Wilbur. tsmweb Tom has it right. Please read the folloing rule. My take is that nobody can hide behind a rule as defense against poor seamanship: "...Rule 2 Responsibility (a) Nothing in these Rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner, master or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to comply with these Rules or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances of the case. (b) In construing and complying with these Rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision and to any special circumstances, including the limitations of the vessels involved, which may make a departure from these Rules necessary to avoid immediate danger. Rule 2 This is often referred to unofficially as the "Rule of Good Seamanship" or the "General Prudential Rule." This Rule first states that all the Rules must be complied with, and the customary practices of good seamanship must be followed. But it then goes on to recognize that there may be "special circumstances." Its intention is to apply common sense to the interpretation and application of the Rules, and to prevent any perversion of the Rules to avoid the consequences of their misconstruction or misapplication. It recognizes that a departure from the strict language of the Rules may be required to avoid immediate danger - no vessel has the right of way through another vessel! There may be special situations where a departure from the Rules is not only desirable, but is required. Should a collision result, strict literal compliance with the Rules may not be a defense...." not always by-the-book Bob |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob" wrote
no vessel has the right of way through another vessel! That's the whole COLREGS. The rest is commentary. (I am, in fact, standing on one foot.) |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you really want to understand these rules, get a copy of "Farwell's
Rules of the Nautical Road". It has chapters on each rule, and discusses all the court cases and how they've interpreted each. As far as a "proper look-out" probably all of us violate that rule every time we go out. Here's why: Pg. 141 - Note 45. "The Supreme Court long ago established that the lookout must be exclusively employed in the lookout duties. (Supreme Court Case cited here). Note 46. (court case cited here)..."a proper lookout must be someone other than the deck officer or helmsman"... (another court case cited)... "required lookout can have no other duties that detract from the keeping of a proper lookout:. That being said, there appears to be a move underway to revisit the "one man bridge organization" or OMBO. Another comment out of Farwell's: __________________ The term look-out implies watching and listening so that there is awareness of what is happening around the vessel. The emphasis is on performing the action, not on the person. Senate Report 96-979 which accompanies Rule 5, permits the helmsman to serve as lookout: On vessels where there is an unobstructed all-round view provided at the steering station, as on certain pleasure craft, fishing boats, and towing vessels, or where there is no impairment of night vision or other impediment to keeping a proper lookout, the watch officer or helmsman may safely serve as the lookout. However, it is expected that this practice will only be followed after the situation has been carefully assessed on each occasion, and it has been clearly established that it is prudent to do so. Full account shall be taken of all relevant factors, including but not limited to the state of the weather, conditions of visibility, traffic density, and proximity of navigational hazards. It is not the intent of these rules to require additional personnel forward, if none is required to enhance safety. S. Rep. No. 979, 96 th Cong., 2d Sess. 7-8 (1980). ___________________________________________ The OMBO is still highly contested, and the courts still much prefer a dedicated lookout. Of course all this is moot unless you have a collision and end up in court, in which case the first thing they're going to look at is if you and the other boat had "proper look-outs". |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob" wrote in message ups.com... On Aug 11, 6:18 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Rule 5 comes under Part B, "Steering and Sailing Rules" meaning rules for vessels steering and sailing, in other words vessels underway. Underway vessels do not include anchored vessels which, unless they're dragging, they're not underway nor are they steering or sailing. I can not agree with you on this one Wilbur. tsmweb Tom has it right. Please read the folloing rule. My take is that nobody can hide behind a rule as defense against poor seamanship: "...Rule 2 Responsibility (a) Nothing in these Rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner, master or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to comply with these Rules or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances of the case. (b) In construing and complying with these Rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision and to any special circumstances, including the limitations of the vessels involved, which may make a departure from these Rules necessary to avoid immediate danger. Rule 2 This is often referred to unofficially as the "Rule of Good Seamanship" or the "General Prudential Rule." This Rule first states that all the Rules must be complied with, and the customary practices of good seamanship must be followed. But it then goes on to recognize that there may be "special circumstances." Its intention is to apply common sense to the interpretation and application of the Rules, and to prevent any perversion of the Rules to avoid the consequences of their misconstruction or misapplication. It recognizes that a departure from the strict language of the Rules may be required to avoid immediate danger - no vessel has the right of way through another vessel! There may be special situations where a departure from the Rules is not only desirable, but is required. Should a collision result, strict literal compliance with the Rules may not be a defense...." not always by-the-book Bob If I used your and Jeff's flawed logic it would follow that your boat is your prison. If you had to keep a lookout "at all times" it would mean when your boat was on the hard getting the bottom painted. It would mean when your boat was sitting on the trailer. It would mean when your boat was in your back yard. It would mean when your boat was on a tractor trailer rig being hauled across country. It would mean when your boat was tied up in the slip. You could never leave your boat because the rule says "at all times." See how stupid it gets? Nope, in spite of what you and Jeff try to claim, Rule 5 appears only under the Steering and Sailing rules. Hence it only applies when steering and sailing. Anchored boats, boats tied up at a dock, boats aground, are not steering and sailing. Don't try to obfuscate by bring up a bunch of other rules. They don't apply in a discussion of what Rule 5 says. Wilbur Hubbard |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't be a total idiot all the time, Willy..... there's a big difference between most of what you say and a boat at anchor. Try to remember Rule 2 and use some common sense for a change ] "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in anews.com: If I used your and Jeff's flawed logic it would follow that your boat is your prison. If you had to keep a lookout "at all times" it would mean when your boat was on the hard getting the bottom painted. It would mean when your boat was sitting on the trailer. It would mean when your boat was in your back yard. It would mean when your boat was on a tractor trailer rig being hauled across country. It would mean when your boat was tied up in the slip. You could never leave your boat because the rule says "at all times." See how stupid it gets? Nope, in spite of what you and Jeff try to claim, Rule 5 appears only under the Steering and Sailing rules. Hence it only applies when steering and sailing. Anchored boats, boats tied up at a dock, boats aground, are not steering and sailing. Don't try to obfuscate by bring up a bunch of other rules. They don't apply in a discussion of what Rule 5 says. Wilbur Hubbard |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"otnmbrd" wrote in message .70... Don't be a total idiot all the time, Willy..... there's a big difference between most of what you say and a boat at anchor. Try to remember Rule 2 and use some common sense for a change Nothing wrong with a rule about applying common sense and caution when navigating and being on notice that special circumstances may arise where good judgment might be called for when no specific rule applies but this has nothing to do with maintaining a lookout "at all times." So, that's the crux of the matter. Anchoring does, indeed, come under the auspices of navigation. When you're anchored you can be said to be "in navigation." But, anchoring is NOT considered steering or sailing. Since a lookout is required at all times when steering and sailing (that's the section rule 5's under - not navigating), it follows rule 5 applies at all times while steering and sailing. There's simply no way anchored boats can be said to be steering or sailing. Can't you see the difference? Wilbur Hubbard "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in anews.com: If I used your and Jeff's flawed logic it would follow that your boat is your prison. If you had to keep a lookout "at all times" it would mean when your boat was on the hard getting the bottom painted. It would mean when your boat was sitting on the trailer. It would mean when your boat was in your back yard. It would mean when your boat was on a tractor trailer rig being hauled across country. It would mean when your boat was tied up in the slip. You could never leave your boat because the rule says "at all times." See how stupid it gets? Nope, in spite of what you and Jeff try to claim, Rule 5 appears only under the Steering and Sailing rules. Hence it only applies when steering and sailing. Anchored boats, boats tied up at a dock, boats aground, are not steering and sailing. Don't try to obfuscate by bring up a bunch of other rules. They don't apply in a discussion of what Rule 5 says. Wilbur Hubbard |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Farwell's is out of date. I have an up-to-date discussion including
specific court cases on my web page. This topic is specifically discussed. http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/commun...&groupid=45696 See "Rules for the Rest of Us" John... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Emergency beacon info from USCG/USCG Aux | General | |||
| Colregs Questions; BORING! | ASA | |||
| Help me with Rule 30 of the colregs please | ASA | |||
| Colregs - flashing lights | Cruising | |||
| COLREGS- Mooron Style | ASA | |||