Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:34:19 -0400, Jeff wrote:
* Vic Smith wrote, On 6/12/2007 8:55 AM: If my wife would let me sell the house I might consider the PDQ, and could then look down on the Mac myself. Why would you "look down" on any boat? Almost all boats, the Mac included, have their place. Contrary to Ed's delusions, I don't hate the Mac. All I've done is point out that some of the outrageous claims don't hold water. My apologies. No offense intended. "Look down" was a thoughtless and wrong expression. Let's just say that if I had a quarter million boat budget a Mac 26 "would not be considered" - for any purpose. I would simply buy one sailboat that sailed well for sailing and a boat like the Parker for gunkholing, and have plenty of cash to spare. Or maybe a low draft cat, which could actually suit both goals. My impression is that a knee-deep (=24") draft cat with suitable 3 week livability for 2 either doesn't exist or cost too much for my budget, but I may be wrong about that, as I haven't looked hard. I do think cats make the best cruisers and generally sail very well, so I'm in no way a traditional sailing purist. BTW, using that Mac which turtled as an argument against the Mac is akin to claiming F/P Tobago 35 cruising cats flip easily because of that recent Gulf incident. Apparently that cat also flipped in '01. http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/...rs-3534-3.html These rare owner-induced incidents put me off a boat no more than knowing that a 42' mast shouldn't be sailed under high voltage lines hanging 40' above the water. The bottom line for the Mac is that it has two distinguishing features: It has a power boat inspired hull that permits it to make use of the large engine, and it has maximized the interior space of a street legal boat. However these features don't come without a cost. Its virtually the slowest sailer you could buy. As a powerboat it also has limitations - it isn't really that fast, and certainly wouldn't be much fun in a real sea. So if the two big features are truly big features for you, then maybe the Mac is a good choice. I would strongly consider it if I wanted to drive around the country and explore the inland lakes. But I think you've already said that the large engine and the trailering are not top priority for you, so I'm not sure why you're in love with the Mac. Nice analysis. Might be more accurate to say I'm in love with Mac threads rather than Macs, since I'm always learning something and getting my mind changed in some respect in those threads, and comparable boats unknown to me are recommended. In order, the shallow draft, cabin, turnkey condition and price are what I like most about the available Macs. Light air and pointing performance are big negatives. I've concluded I won't know what compromises I'll make until I sail a number of different boats in the very waters where I intend to sail. However, it has never occurred to me to get a new Marshall. These boat are quite well made, and the $35K that you would pay for a Mac would get you a rather high quality example. In fact of the 5 currently listed on YachtWorld, all are under 30K. These are extremely solid hulls, simple rigs, strong diesels. The systems are minimal - no gensets or A/C - so needed repairs would be minimal. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if a used Marshall actually has fewer problems than a new Mac. As for space, the styles are quite different. Certainly the cockpit on the Marshall is far more comfortable than the Mac, but it doesn't have the two double bunks. Also, I'd expect the Marshall to be faster. I looked and see your point here. They are very nice looking boats, all around and inside. Here's one "review." http://www.sailnet.com/boatchk/showp...p?product=1138 Though I won't go ocean sailing, I can't exclude the possibility of getting caught in 6-8' waves in the Gulf. I'm not sure the Marshall 22 would be safer in that than the Mac 26. Jeff, though I appreciate your advice, I'm thinking more in line with Capt'n Neal's website boat buying advice regarding price. Trouble is the Capt'n is a deep keel, blue water, bristol fashion sailor. You really drank the Kool-aid on that one!!! Coffee. Lots of it. But Neal is right that your first boat should be simple and cheap. This will be a learning experience, both learning how to care for a boat, and learning what kind of boat you want. And I just want a fairly comfortable gunkholer. Is there some reason why you need a new boat? No, but I don't buy fixer-uppers. I like turnkey shipshape. I can handle buying old cars because I concentrate on certain models I know well. I *never* encounter unanticipated expenses. I know diddly about boat construction and hidden problems, except that many owners find out about them too late. If I buy used, I'll go in with my eyes open. --Vic |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
US federal judge declares boating illegal in all US navigable waters | General | |||
Weapons on board outside of USA waters. . . what to do? | General | |||
What does it take to enter US waters by boat? | General | |||
Waters Dancing Boat Kits | Touring | |||
Free Boundary Waters Thermal Shirt | Touring |