On Tue, 29 May 2007 17:27:43 +0700, Bruce
wrote:

http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
(States opposition view that fire did not cause collapse)

One of the most telling statements regarding the competence of the
rebuttal argument is contained in the following exchange about the
diesel fuel system in the building:

Report: One gallon would be consumed and the other 2 gallons would
continue to circulate through the system.

Rebuttal: This is odd. Why pump 3 gallons when only 1 is needed?

Clearly the "experts" have no clue about the workings of a diesel
engine but believe themselves competent to disagree with a team of
professional investigators.