Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
Besides Practical Sailor, can anyone suggest a good "how-to" book or article
(particularly for a beginner) dealing with the application of bottom paint and other maintenance procedures? All the BoatUS stores have free handouts (mostly from Don Casey) on how to do most common maintenance tasks. Also, Casey's book "This Old Boat" is a good reference volume on how to do just about everything on your boat |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
Besides Practical Sailor, can anyone suggest a good "how-to" book or article
(particularly for a beginner) dealing with the application of bottom paint and other maintenance procedures? All the BoatUS stores have free handouts (mostly from Don Casey) on how to do most common maintenance tasks. Also, Casey's book "This Old Boat" is a good reference volume on how to do just about everything on your boat |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
Thanks for the useful info.
Steve H. "Baybyter" wrote in message ... Besides Practical Sailor, can anyone suggest a good "how-to" book or article (particularly for a beginner) dealing with the application of bottom paint and other maintenance procedures? All the BoatUS stores have free handouts (mostly from Don Casey) on how to do most common maintenance tasks. Also, Casey's book "This Old Boat" is a good reference volume on how to do just about everything on your boat |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
Thanks for the useful info.
Steve H. "Baybyter" wrote in message ... Besides Practical Sailor, can anyone suggest a good "how-to" book or article (particularly for a beginner) dealing with the application of bottom paint and other maintenance procedures? All the BoatUS stores have free handouts (mostly from Don Casey) on how to do most common maintenance tasks. Also, Casey's book "This Old Boat" is a good reference volume on how to do just about everything on your boat |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
um, I sort of doubt it. Tbt based antifouling has been banned since the
late1980's. Pierre "Ed" wrote in message ... Although you mentioned copper based paint, 6 years ago you might of had the last of the TIN based stuff (original Micro 44 etc) I used to get 2 years + with that paint. It was so good I rarely got barnacles on my wheels even though the paint would not stick to the wheels (Just the poison in the water I guess) It is now illegal except for large commercial vessels (With better lobbyists) Parallax wrote: Practical Sailor just had a letter about boatyards not letting ppl do their own bottom painting but still charging an arm and leg to have the yard do it. My experience is that yards do a crappy job with almost no surface preparation except for a pressure wash. The few times I have allowed a yard to do it was a waste of money as it fouled in less than 3 months. 6 years ago, I hauled my boat and sanded the bottom, applied 3 coats of hard CuO based paint (BottomKote or something like that)and suddenly had to stop sailing due to business problems. My boat sat for 4 years being used very little in a place that fouled heavily. Finally, I had her hauled to be brought to my home and was amazed to find NO fouling at all. A boat next to mine was so heavily fouled it grew oysters. I know from some past experience that my own bottomcoating job is superior to that done by the yardss but this was amazing. Did I do something right or just get lucky? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
um, I sort of doubt it. Tbt based antifouling has been banned since the
late1980's. Pierre "Ed" wrote in message ... Although you mentioned copper based paint, 6 years ago you might of had the last of the TIN based stuff (original Micro 44 etc) I used to get 2 years + with that paint. It was so good I rarely got barnacles on my wheels even though the paint would not stick to the wheels (Just the poison in the water I guess) It is now illegal except for large commercial vessels (With better lobbyists) Parallax wrote: Practical Sailor just had a letter about boatyards not letting ppl do their own bottom painting but still charging an arm and leg to have the yard do it. My experience is that yards do a crappy job with almost no surface preparation except for a pressure wash. The few times I have allowed a yard to do it was a waste of money as it fouled in less than 3 months. 6 years ago, I hauled my boat and sanded the bottom, applied 3 coats of hard CuO based paint (BottomKote or something like that)and suddenly had to stop sailing due to business problems. My boat sat for 4 years being used very little in a place that fouled heavily. Finally, I had her hauled to be brought to my home and was amazed to find NO fouling at all. A boat next to mine was so heavily fouled it grew oysters. I know from some past experience that my own bottomcoating job is superior to that done by the yardss but this was amazing. Did I do something right or just get lucky? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
In catching up with my newsgroups after a long hiatus helping burned out
folks from the San Diego Cedar Mtn fire, I would like to add to Jere's experience with multiple coats. I have berthed my Santana 22 continuously in the water over the past 20 years in both the SF Bay Area and the Oregon Coast where the barnacle growth can be nasty. In both cases I followed the advice of the previous owner to get more than one coat put on when redoing the bottom paint. Hence, I have asked for two coats when I was in the Bay Area and three coats since moving to Oregon. In all instances, I have gone an average of three years between paint jobs with little or no marine growth after pressure washing while neighbors in adjoining berths have had to haul out every year for repainting. In a recent case I went for five years before repainting because of pressures at work and other items taking my attention elsewhere. The yard was prepared for a horror story when I told them of the time since the last haulout, but to our mutual surprise, pressure washing easily removed all growth with no damage whatsoever to the hull underneath and the paint was still intact! My analysis of this is that one coat can have thin spots or bare spots that are missed in moving the support pads around. Two coats reduces this risk and three coats reduces it further. In addition, given the cost of haul out and the time required, the cost of the extra paint is a small portion of the bill and worth the extra assurance. Note that I have had three different yards do this over the years at my request with similar results in each case. This does not mean that one can get by with poor preparation work, but even a good preparation can be undone if the paint is thin in spots or a few small places are missed. Two or more coats helps prevent that occurring. Ken "Jere Lull" wrote in message ... Parallax wrote: Practical Sailor just had a letter about boatyards not letting ppl do their own bottom painting but still charging an arm and leg to have the yard do it. My experience is that yards do a crappy job with almost no surface preparation except for a pressure wash. The few times I have allowed a yard to do it was a waste of money as it fouled in less than 3 months. 6 years ago, I hauled my boat and sanded the bottom, applied 3 coats of hard CuO based paint (BottomKote or something like that)and suddenly had to stop sailing due to business problems. My boat sat for 4 years being used very little in a place that fouled heavily. Finally, I had her hauled to be brought to my home and was amazed to find NO fouling at all. A boat next to mine was so heavily fouled it grew oysters. I know from some past experience that my own bottomcoating job is superior to that done by the yardss but this was amazing. Did I do something right or just get lucky? From my experience, yards will use the cheapest formulation that works in their area most years. Frankly, that makes sense. On our first moored boat, I didn't know anything and paid the yard to do the bottom at the start of a particularly bad year. Within a month, the growth was almost 2" thick. They hauled, scraped and recoated the bottom with something better at their cost. Since, I've applied Practical Sailor's recommendations and have had essentially no growth survive the powerwashing. One year, as a test, I didn't overcoat our "hard" paint (supposedly it was "dead" after 6 months' exposure to air. Little survived the powerwashing, but there were a few carcasses of hard growth. I few years ago, I started using an ablative paint and haven't had hard growth survive powerwashing except where I didn't touch up the hard paint showing through (another test). This time, I put two coats at the waterline, a single coat below. We'll see how things worked this year, though of course I don't know how hard our powerwash guy works. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
In catching up with my newsgroups after a long hiatus helping burned out
folks from the San Diego Cedar Mtn fire, I would like to add to Jere's experience with multiple coats. I have berthed my Santana 22 continuously in the water over the past 20 years in both the SF Bay Area and the Oregon Coast where the barnacle growth can be nasty. In both cases I followed the advice of the previous owner to get more than one coat put on when redoing the bottom paint. Hence, I have asked for two coats when I was in the Bay Area and three coats since moving to Oregon. In all instances, I have gone an average of three years between paint jobs with little or no marine growth after pressure washing while neighbors in adjoining berths have had to haul out every year for repainting. In a recent case I went for five years before repainting because of pressures at work and other items taking my attention elsewhere. The yard was prepared for a horror story when I told them of the time since the last haulout, but to our mutual surprise, pressure washing easily removed all growth with no damage whatsoever to the hull underneath and the paint was still intact! My analysis of this is that one coat can have thin spots or bare spots that are missed in moving the support pads around. Two coats reduces this risk and three coats reduces it further. In addition, given the cost of haul out and the time required, the cost of the extra paint is a small portion of the bill and worth the extra assurance. Note that I have had three different yards do this over the years at my request with similar results in each case. This does not mean that one can get by with poor preparation work, but even a good preparation can be undone if the paint is thin in spots or a few small places are missed. Two or more coats helps prevent that occurring. Ken "Jere Lull" wrote in message ... Parallax wrote: Practical Sailor just had a letter about boatyards not letting ppl do their own bottom painting but still charging an arm and leg to have the yard do it. My experience is that yards do a crappy job with almost no surface preparation except for a pressure wash. The few times I have allowed a yard to do it was a waste of money as it fouled in less than 3 months. 6 years ago, I hauled my boat and sanded the bottom, applied 3 coats of hard CuO based paint (BottomKote or something like that)and suddenly had to stop sailing due to business problems. My boat sat for 4 years being used very little in a place that fouled heavily. Finally, I had her hauled to be brought to my home and was amazed to find NO fouling at all. A boat next to mine was so heavily fouled it grew oysters. I know from some past experience that my own bottomcoating job is superior to that done by the yardss but this was amazing. Did I do something right or just get lucky? From my experience, yards will use the cheapest formulation that works in their area most years. Frankly, that makes sense. On our first moored boat, I didn't know anything and paid the yard to do the bottom at the start of a particularly bad year. Within a month, the growth was almost 2" thick. They hauled, scraped and recoated the bottom with something better at their cost. Since, I've applied Practical Sailor's recommendations and have had essentially no growth survive the powerwashing. One year, as a test, I didn't overcoat our "hard" paint (supposedly it was "dead" after 6 months' exposure to air. Little survived the powerwashing, but there were a few carcasses of hard growth. I few years ago, I started using an ablative paint and haven't had hard growth survive powerwashing except where I didn't touch up the hard paint showing through (another test). This time, I put two coats at the waterline, a single coat below. We'll see how things worked this year, though of course I don't know how hard our powerwash guy works. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:17:55 -0800, "Ken Shaw"
wrote: ------------------------------ snip ------------------------------- My analysis of this is that one coat can have thin spots or bare spots that are missed in moving the support pads around. Two coats reduces this risk and three coats reduces it further. In addition, given the cost of haul out and the time required, the cost of the extra paint is a small portion of the bill and worth the extra assurance. My little Hunter 310 lives where it must be in a yard over the winter, so hauling out each year is not a separate issue. However, my quick-and-dirty solution to the annual "missed-a-spot" problem with ablative paint is alternating between having blue and red below the waterline. Makes it pretty obvious, either color looks OK on a white hull, and I try not to sail upside down anyway. Fair winds, Al |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom painting
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:17:55 -0800, "Ken Shaw"
wrote: ------------------------------ snip ------------------------------- My analysis of this is that one coat can have thin spots or bare spots that are missed in moving the support pads around. Two coats reduces this risk and three coats reduces it further. In addition, given the cost of haul out and the time required, the cost of the extra paint is a small portion of the bill and worth the extra assurance. My little Hunter 310 lives where it must be in a yard over the winter, so hauling out each year is not a separate issue. However, my quick-and-dirty solution to the annual "missed-a-spot" problem with ablative paint is alternating between having blue and red below the waterline. Makes it pretty obvious, either color looks OK on a white hull, and I try not to sail upside down anyway. Fair winds, Al |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Water in bottom end.. over and over | General | |||
Looking for books or articles on bottom painting and other maintenance . . . | General | |||
Bottom washer | Cruising | |||
white film on green bottom paint, running | General | |||
Removing bottom paint... | General |