"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

No, you are incorrect. There comes a point when any sane man cannot let
wack job nutcases have a say on an equal footing with the factual and the
sensible.

Should that Islamic fascist, Ahmadenijad, who says the holocaust never
happened and that Israel should be wiped off the face of the map, be given
equal time with legitimate historians who don't deny the holocaust? Hell
no! People like that should be shouted down and have rotten vegetable
tossed in their faces. The more you let people spout their total nonsense
on equal footing with reasonable explanations the more you lend them
credence. The more you lower the bar for the reasonable and the sensible.
I believe in letting everybody have their say. But, I also believe what
people say should have consequences. If you say something stupid and
obnoxious enough then, if somebody after hearing you out decides to punch
your right in the nose, you learn real fast that actions have consequences
and talking crap might just get you crapped on. You've heard the old
saying that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes accepted fact?
That's the trouble with allowing wack job conspiracists to remain
unchallenged. You MUST not only challenge their flaky ideas but you must
point out that they cannot think clearly either. You must show their
inferior intellects are not capable of rational thought. In other words
their ideas reveal their brain function. Dumb, stupid conspiracy ideas =
dumb, stupid conspiracy brain.

The widespread belief in human caused global warming is a good example of
what happens when you let a bunch of nutjobs spout their nonsense ad
nausea over a period of years without challenge. It becomes a religion. A
totally irrational religion based on belief and not on facts. That's why
it's important not only to refute nonsense but identify individuals who
spout nonsense as fact as defective mentally.

Wilbur Hubbard

So you endorse the initiation of physical violence against people who say
things you find overtly offensive?

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

No, you are incorrect. There comes a point when any sane man cannot
let wack job nutcases have a say on an equal footing with the factual
and the sensible.

Should that Islamic fascist, Ahmadenijad, who says the holocaust
never happened and that Israel should be wiped off the face of the
map, be given equal time with legitimate historians who don't deny
the holocaust? Hell no! People like that should be shouted down and
have rotten vegetable tossed in their faces. The more you let people
spout their total nonsense on equal footing with reasonable
explanations the more you lend them credence. The more you lower the
bar for the reasonable and the sensible. I believe in letting
everybody have their say. But, I also believe what people say should
have consequences. If you say something stupid and obnoxious enough
then, if somebody after hearing you out decides to punch your right
in the nose, you learn real fast that actions have consequences and
talking crap might just get you crapped on. You've heard the old
saying that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes accepted
fact? That's the trouble with allowing wack job conspiracists to
remain unchallenged. You MUST not only challenge their flaky ideas
but you must point out that they cannot think clearly either. You
must show their inferior intellects are not capable of rational
thought. In other words their ideas reveal their brain function.
Dumb, stupid conspiracy ideas = dumb, stupid conspiracy brain.

The widespread belief in human caused global warming is a good
example of what happens when you let a bunch of nutjobs spout their
nonsense ad nausea over a period of years without challenge. It
becomes a religion. A totally irrational religion based on belief and
not on facts. That's why it's important not only to refute nonsense
but identify individuals who spout nonsense as fact as defective
mentally.

Wilbur Hubbard

So you endorse the initiation of physical violence against people who
say things you find overtly offensive?


Yes! It's a time-honored tradition.

Wilbur Hubbard

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:04:55 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:


"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
news:4KydnSC63OcUbG_YnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@centurytel. net...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

No, you are incorrect. There comes a point when any sane man cannot
let wack job nutcases have a say on an equal footing with the factual
and the sensible.

Should that Islamic fascist, Ahmadenijad, who says the holocaust
never happened and that Israel should be wiped off the face of the
map, be given equal time with legitimate historians who don't deny
the holocaust? Hell no! People like that should be shouted down and
have rotten vegetable tossed in their faces. The more you let people
spout their total nonsense on equal footing with reasonable
explanations the more you lend them credence. The more you lower the
bar for the reasonable and the sensible. I believe in letting
everybody have their say. But, I also believe what people say should
have consequences. If you say something stupid and obnoxious enough
then, if somebody after hearing you out decides to punch your right
in the nose, you learn real fast that actions have consequences and
talking crap might just get you crapped on. You've heard the old
saying that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes accepted
fact? That's the trouble with allowing wack job conspiracists to
remain unchallenged. You MUST not only challenge their flaky ideas
but you must point out that they cannot think clearly either. You
must show their inferior intellects are not capable of rational
thought. In other words their ideas reveal their brain function.
Dumb, stupid conspiracy ideas = dumb, stupid conspiracy brain.

The widespread belief in human caused global warming is a good
example of what happens when you let a bunch of nutjobs spout their
nonsense ad nausea over a period of years without challenge. It
becomes a religion. A totally irrational religion based on belief and
not on facts. That's why it's important not only to refute nonsense
but identify individuals who spout nonsense as fact as defective
mentally.

Wilbur Hubbard

So you endorse the initiation of physical violence against people who
say things you find overtly offensive?


Yes! It's a time-honored tradition.

Wilbur Hubbard

Sounds like current American foreign policy to me.

Wait, Why doesn't one of you punch Mr Bush on the nose given this
logic? Every news item Ii see him on has him stating "weapons of mass
destruction" when they haven't found any and "War on terrorism in
Iraq" when Al Khaida and Sadam were sworn enemies and his terrorism
was aimed solely as his own citizens.

cheers,
"Waiting for Wilbur"
Peter

"Peter Hendra" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:04:55 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:


"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
news:4KydnSC63OcUbG_YnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@centurytel .net...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

No, you are incorrect. There comes a point when any sane man cannot
let wack job nutcases have a say on an equal footing with the
factual
and the sensible.

Should that Islamic fascist, Ahmadenijad, who says the holocaust
never happened and that Israel should be wiped off the face of the
map, be given equal time with legitimate historians who don't deny
the holocaust? Hell no! People like that should be shouted down and
have rotten vegetable tossed in their faces. The more you let
people
spout their total nonsense on equal footing with reasonable
explanations the more you lend them credence. The more you lower
the
bar for the reasonable and the sensible. I believe in letting
everybody have their say. But, I also believe what people say
should
have consequences. If you say something stupid and obnoxious enough
then, if somebody after hearing you out decides to punch your right
in the nose, you learn real fast that actions have consequences and
talking crap might just get you crapped on. You've heard the old
saying that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes accepted
fact? That's the trouble with allowing wack job conspiracists to
remain unchallenged. You MUST not only challenge their flaky ideas
but you must point out that they cannot think clearly either. You
must show their inferior intellects are not capable of rational
thought. In other words their ideas reveal their brain function.
Dumb, stupid conspiracy ideas = dumb, stupid conspiracy brain.

The widespread belief in human caused global warming is a good
example of what happens when you let a bunch of nutjobs spout their
nonsense ad nausea over a period of years without challenge. It
becomes a religion. A totally irrational religion based on belief
and
not on facts. That's why it's important not only to refute nonsense
but identify individuals who spout nonsense as fact as defective
mentally.

Wilbur Hubbard

So you endorse the initiation of physical violence against people
who
say things you find overtly offensive?


Yes! It's a time-honored tradition.

Wilbur Hubbard

Sounds like current American foreign policy to me.

Wait, Why doesn't one of you punch Mr Bush on the nose given this
logic? Every news item Ii see him on has him stating "weapons of mass
destruction" when they haven't found any and "War on terrorism in
Iraq" when Al Khaida and Sadam were sworn enemies and his terrorism
was aimed solely as his own citizens.


Some people say things that are offensive enough to inspire digital
tomato throwing while you, on the other hand, just repeat things that
are merely humorous in their decrepitude.

Wilbur Hubbard

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:57:27 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:


"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

horse**** snipped for hygenic reasons

So you endorse the initiation of physical violence against people who say
things you find overtly offensive?

Of course he does, he said so several times in this last screed. This
bonehead is the poster-boy for everything wrong with America. So certain
of his certitude, his only response to the cognitive dissonance that
passes for his thought processes, is the threat of violence to coerce
those who think differently to comply with his certain view of the world.
Talk about a whack-job. Killfile this moron and move on.

"mr.b" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:57:27 -0600, KLC Lewis wrote:


"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

horse**** snipped for hygenic reasons

So you endorse the initiation of physical violence against people who
say
things you find overtly offensive?

Of course he does, he said so several times in this last screed. This
bonehead is the poster-boy for everything wrong with America. So
certain
of his certitude, his only response to the cognitive dissonance that
passes for his thought processes, is the threat of violence to coerce
those who think differently to comply with his certain view of the
world.
Talk about a whack-job. Killfile this moron and move on.

And Mr. B's an example of a total hypocrite. Rather than read, listen
and argue and perhaps toss a rotten tomato if highly offended, this Rube
won't even listen. His is a closed mind. And notice the happy reference
to "Killfile". In other words, it's not good enough to just walk away
and not listen he must kill (even if figuratively) the speaker. And to
carry it one step further he happily instructs others to kill as well.
This is exactly the kind of pompous, creepy nut case to whom I refer. He
advocates peace, harmony and non-violence on one hand yet he happily
kills on the other.

How can an individual like this live with himself? Clearly it's only by
sticking his head in the sand to somewhat rid his senses of the reek
that emanates from his foul, fetid frame of mind.

Wilbur Hubbard

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:34:11 -0500, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote:



And Mr. B's an example of a total hypocrite. Rather than read, listen
and argue and perhaps toss a rotten tomato if highly offended, this Rube
won't even listen. His is a closed mind. And notice the happy reference
to "Killfile". In other words, it's not good enough to just walk away
and not listen he must kill (even if figuratively) the speaker. And to
carry it one step further he happily instructs others to kill as well.
This is exactly the kind of pompous, creepy nut case to whom I refer. He
advocates peace, harmony and non-violence on one hand yet he happily
kills on the other.

How can an individual like this live with himself? Clearly it's only by
sticking his head in the sand to somewhat rid his senses of the reek
that emanates from his foul, fetid frame of mind.

Wilbur Hubbard

forgive me, I should have remembered....

When an ass brays, one does not have to bray back

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...


bs deleted


So you endorse the initiation of physical violence against people who say
things you find overtly offensive?


Yes, he does. He's a troll and is only interested in disruption. Jus ignore
im.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com