Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
Paul,
With all due respect, I must disagree with many aspects of your post. To the question of "ever make it strong enough", I believe you will find that many boat yards would be able to do so, and without any real doubt about the quality of the final product. The question would be at what cost, which may be high enough to abandon the project. But that is an economic, not emotional decision. In terms of technical abilities, if someone decided to "add" additional bulkheads to an existing hull, there would be no problem doing so - and most yards could handle this type of work and claim that the new bulkheads were bonded as well or better than the original. They might weigh significantly more, they might look worse, but technically it is feasible (if more difficult) to rebond to existing fiberglass. In this case, it may be necessary to do something quite like that. Whether the expense of doing so makes sense would be for the owner to determine, but from an engineering standpoint I don't believe there is anything we've heard that contradicts this approach. As to "never reach 100% new as-built strength", I don't quite understand what this means. Are you suggesting that the manufacturer's "as built" product is as strong as it could ever possibly be, and that any modification would necessarily detract from this idealized value? Boat builders, even Morgans, don't always build "as strong as it could possibly be" because there are other factors to consider, such as cost, design constraints, weight ratios, flex, etc. Some engineer or architect (more likely some manager or accountant) decided exactly how strong they could get away with making something and still sell it to their target market. It could always have been built better, but they didn't believe the customer would pay more for it. Again, this is an issue of cost. The practical limit on upper strength could always be improved in just about any vessel ever made. Testing the repair can be done in a number of ways, but it would not require the "knot in your gut" feelings you describe, nor the numerous sea trials of increasing magnitude. The owner can hire engineers to examine the work and bench test it, and delivery captains (the test pilots of the sea) to see how she performs under load. It would not be difficult to determine how well the joints held, or if there was any leakage. It is simply a matter of the cost of arranging it. Your statement that "this was not what the dream was about" is also highly suspect. Unless it was your dream (and my understanding was that it was Skip & his wife's, and they did not appoint you as their dream adviser) then who are you to presume to make this claim? Perhaps shouldering on after a difficult setback is exactly what their dream was about? Do you know this? Did you ask them? Furthermore, your prognosis that "your love for her will turn to hate just from this nagging mistrust" seems awfully well informed about the owner's psyche. How well do you know him? Have you had long conversations with him about his feelings around this situation? Are you basing this on some expert opinion on human dynamics? Where is the data or rational to support this claim? Personally, it sounds like your own fears and prejudices bleeding through here under the guise of a disinterested third party offering unsolicited technical advise. Perhaps knowing how well the boat stood up to a pounding in the first place really impressed the owner and gave him great respect for the innate quality of the construction. Perhaps knowing how well the boat was repaired and tested would give him even greater confidence and trust in his boat. Maybe this experience will make him an even better sailor and better able to avoid ever placing his newly repaired boat in harms way again. Or maybe he'll decide that it isn't cost effective to try again with this particular hull, because the price of repairing the damage makes it more feasible to start again with another vessel. In either case, I don't think "nagging doubt" should be the determining factor, but cost should. Spinning the emotional slant doesn't seem appropriate or justifiable here. Robb Paul wrote: In article , "KLC Lewis" wrote: So now the question becomes, can you ever make it strong enough without that access? How could you ever know how strong it was? You'll never reach 100% new as-built strength. But even if you did by some chance, you'll never be able to KNOW exactly how strong the repair is. You'll have to take her out in progressivly more stressful conditions and each time there will be that knot in your gut. Will it take 5' seas? 6' seas? 7' seas pounding for day after day? Even if it does, you'll not know if the next wave will be the one. You'll crawl around in the bildge after each short trip looking for problems that really can't be seen. This is not what the dream was about. No, it will never be a Morgan again. Not so that you can trust her just because there is a long history of Morgans that are built just like her that have proven themselves countless times. That was why you bought a Morgan in the first place. The confidence that she'll be able to handle anything the sea throws at her. That's gone for good now. There will always be a nagging doubt. You'll live in fear of every new set of conditions, only trusting her if conditions are just perfect, and they never are. Over time your love for her will turn to hate just from this nagging mistrust. You'll find more and more excuses to leave her at the dock. Afraid each and every time you leave a port. No, even a horse you dearly love should be put down when the time comes. Do it swiftly and without regrets. Good luck, Paul |
#22
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
One issue that hasn't been discussed is that eventually this boat will be
sold again and do you think that the new owner will have faith in the work which has been done? You might do the greatest job in the world and build it stronger than it was from the factory, but that doesn't mean that you'll be able to convice the next buyer of that. To me this is no different than buying a car that was involved in a major accident. It will never be the same. Maybe some parts will be better than new, but there will be things that get missed or re-done wrong. As much as I hate to say it, I wouldn't put money back into this hull. That would be throwing good money after bad. -- Geoff |
#23
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
Discoveries (was) Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
"Skip Gundlach" wrote in
ups.com: Wish us luck (I know, you already do - we're overwhelmed with support, Sure are a lot of Morgan 46s for sale in S Florida after the insurance company totals it..... Larry -- VIRUS ALERT! VISTA has been released! NOONE will be spared! |
#24
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
Discoveries (was) Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
"While they and the insurance company figure out what to do, the yard
bill clicks along at $500 a week just to sit still on the stands." That is NUTS! What the hell kind of **** is this? Call a boat hauler, talk to someone who has a yard ( not boatyard, just a yard, yard ) and get the boat hauled over to that yard. If I lived nearby, I would let you use my yard to get that boat back on its feet. You really need to get off your A.. and get that boat out of where it is. This is starting to **** me off. ========================= "Skip Gundlach" wrote in message ups.com... Of little interest to most, I'm sure, but I, of the curious mind, wonder: What, indeed, were the winds out there that night? In the harsh light of day I see: The Davis wind indicator has lost one leg entirely, and the tab from the other. The hailer horn, newly installed, blew off. The KISS wind generator, also newly installed, left behind only a blackened stump and a length of wire. What sort of speed is required to cause those departures? Surely, based on experience of those in the know, not enough to blow us off course, but enough to do some damage, apparently. I'm sure glad the radar antenna didn't follow the horn mounted below it - apparently it was more aerodynamic and/or more stoutly mounted... Meanwhile, the yard has had its first look; it appears as though - if they care to bid on it at all - it will be strictly time and materials. While they and the insurance company figure out what to do, the yard bill clicks along at $500 a week just to sit still on the stands. I'm beginning to consider a tow back to the yard where we were, as, if this is to be saved, it nearly certainly won't be by the yard here doing the work - I have little doubt the policy limits would be exceeded very quickly, and besides, I expect the insurance company will require firm quotes, which, to protect themselves, the yard will make astronomical. Where we were, we can be stored and worked on for less than 1/6 the yard cost here. If it turns out to be many months, that's many thousands difference in what will inevitably be out-of-pocket expenses - which we currently have no concept of how to find. And, at least up there, we have some "community" having worked on the boat for the last three years there. I'm going to make a concerted effort tomorrow, following conversations with a surveyor who is also a morgan owner, and has recommended various tradespeople to us, to get individual contractors' opinions about the method of attack, as well as the anticipated end cost. If it can possibly be done here, in the parameters of the insurance coverage, we'll go for it. If it's way over, but, say, less than double, likely we'll pull it back to St. Pete, as I am confident we can find competent tradespeople there at comparable or less cost, but save 5k every three months in yard bills, money sorely needed to make repairs... Wish us luck (I know, you already do - we're overwhelmed with support, for which we are without words, as they're simply inadequate, including, today, another morgan owner giving us his suburban he no longer needed, for us to haul the inevitable huge amount of supplies for our refit)... L8R Skip and Lydia -- Morgan 461 #2 Disaster link: http://ipphotos.com/FlyingPig.asp SV Flying Pig KI4MPC See our galleries at www.justpickone.org/skip/gallery! Follow us at and "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain |
#25
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
Discoveries (was) Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
"NE Sailboat" wrote:
"While they and the insurance company figure out what to do, the yard bill clicks along at $500 a week just to sit still on the stands." That is NUTS! What the hell kind of **** is this? Call a boat hauler, talk to someone who has a yard ( not boatyard, just a yard, yard ) and get the boat hauled over to that yard. If I lived nearby, I would let you use my yard to get that boat back on its feet. You really need to get off your A.. and get that boat out of where it is. This is starting to **** me off. The Keys, especially in the winter are horribly expensive. They hired a HS principal for the Marathon HS and he turned the job down because at the salary they could pay, he couldn't afford housing for his family. They charge because they can. Key's Boatworks is actually one of the less expensive ones. It might be cheaper by the month. In 2003 we paid $18/ft (for the month when you included taxes because the published rate was $16) for a slip in Marathon which included 2 pumpouts a month and electric was 10 cents/kwh and water was 3 cents a gallon and there is a minimum monthly charge for both water and electric. So the basic slip charge was $900 for the month plus water and electric. And that was 3 years ago. I can't find out what the costs are in the Marathon Boatyard (in Boot Key Harbor) Incidentally, we were going to buy a car (a conch cruiser) but all the upfront costs (they charge extra if you've not registered a car in Florida before) added so much to the cost that it was cheaper to rent. Otherwise, we used bikes. Marathon is pretty flat and easy to ride a bike in. |
#26
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
On Feb 14, 5:51 am, Geoff Schultz wrote:
One issue that hasn't been discussed is that eventually this boat will be sold again and do you think that the new owner will have faith in the work which has been done? To me this is no different than buying a car that was involved in a major accident. As much as I hate to say it, I wouldn't put money back into this hull. That would be throwing good money after bad. -- Geoff Hi G: I cast my vote in your camp. And this is from a guy who has two subscibtions: This Old House and Old House Journal. I have rebuilt a 1962 Dodge Dart, my now 1905 house and looking at a rehab on my mom's place built in 1886. That one will be a toatal gut to the studs. I know the impoortance of rebuilding and making better. But Skips bills and unknown expenses are just starting to roll in. Latest is $500 per week yard stay. And yes, unless he plans an insurance scuttle in a few years one google search for Flying Pig will reveal to all the crash and 'repair' story. That boat would really need to be a give away for someone to buy it in 5-10 years. If the table was turned, do you think Skip would buy the Pig when he was in search of his dream boat after learning of the boat's crash and repair history....? My vote: take the money........... walk away............. go sailing .. in a Cascade 28' tomorrow. Bob |
#27
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
My vote: take the money........... walk away............. go sailing .. in a Cascade 28' tomorrow. Bob To my knowledge, Cascade doesn't make a 28! G S/V Genesis Cascade 27 |
#28
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
Charlie Morgan wrote:
up. Those here who have some skills and experience in these things will know that it's not magic to make something better when you rebuild it. You observe why something failed, and you figure out how to make it better. CWM Well hell Charlie, what's yer hourly rate? I'm bringing all my reef wrecks to you from now on Nite, Paul It's clear you couldn't afford me. CWM Hell, I couldn't afford myself if I had to pay me Don W. |
#29
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
Discoveries (was) Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
Skip Gundlach wrote: While they and the insurance company figure out what to do, the yard bill clicks along at $500 a week just to sit still on the stands. I'm beginning to consider a tow back to the yard where we were, as, if this is to be saved, it nearly certainly won't be by the yard here doing the work - I have little doubt the policy limits would be exceeded very quickly, and besides, I expect the insurance company will require firm quotes, which, to protect themselves, the yard will make astronomical. Where we were, we can be stored and worked on for less than 1/6 the yard cost here. If it turns out to be many months, that's many thousands difference in what will inevitably be out-of-pocket expenses - which we currently have no concept of how to find. And, at least up there, we have some "community" having worked on the boat for the last three years there. Skip, You should strongly consider having the boat trucked back to your original yard. I've got an acquaintance here in Texas who has a truck and special trailer for hauling sailboats. I was quite surprised how inexpensive it would be to have our 38' sailboat trucked the three hour drive from the coast to Austin. Check around to see who does it in Florida. If they are charging you $500/week to sit on the hard, I'd get that sucker out of there the day after tomorrow!! A month of that will pay the trucking costs to get you back where you were, or to some other yard that is reasonable. If you don't want to go back to where you were, here is a link to other Florida yards. http://www.magicyellow.com/category/...-State_FL.html Truck it out, get it on blocks somewhere reasonable, and then figure out what else to do. Good luck, Don W. |
#30
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update
On Feb 14, 12:40 pm, Gordon wrote:
My vote: take the money........... walk away............. go sailing .. in a Cascade 28' tomorrow. Bob To my knowledge, Cascade doesn't make a 28! G S/V Genesis Cascade 27 My appology. Thank you for the correction. Bewildered BOb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Flying Pig Damage Assessment and update | Boat Building |