Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or
external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Snake River.
Marc wrote: Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Marc wrote:
Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) The Snake River system, hands down. I've yet to see any internal sensor last more than a few years...whereas, because the Snake River senders never come in contact with tank contents, they last literally for decades. The cost is another consideration...the only SeaLand system under $200 is their TankWatch I (about $50), which only lets you know when the tank is full (which I consider next to useless unless you spend all your time parked next to a pumpout). The single tank Snake River Mini for about $100 provides true 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and full readings...and their 4 tank system that lets you combine waste water and diesel in a single system is less than the price of any other single tank monitor. No problem if any of the tanks are aluminum either...Snake River also has internal senders that never come in contact with the tank contents because they're encased in PVC...internal and external senders can be mixed and matched. Fwiw, I've had several SeaLand Tankwatch systems--their expensive ones. I'd never have anything but a Snake River system again. Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Hi Peggie, while I got you on the line, I'm going with the Ronco B126
30 gal. Two 1.5" dip tubes, 1.5" fill, 3/4" vent., all top mounted. With the idea of keeping the number of penetrations to a minimum, is it necessary to have a clean out port? If yes, how about just a 3" boss with a plug instead of a port and plate? On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:15:11 GMT, Peggie Hall wrote: Marc wrote: Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) The Snake River system, hands down. I've yet to see any internal sensor last more than a few years...whereas, because the Snake River senders never come in contact with tank contents, they last literally for decades. The cost is another consideration...the only SeaLand system under $200 is their TankWatch I (about $50), which only lets you know when the tank is full (which I consider next to useless unless you spend all your time parked next to a pumpout). The single tank Snake River Mini for about $100 provides true 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and full readings...and their 4 tank system that lets you combine waste water and diesel in a single system is less than the price of any other single tank monitor. No problem if any of the tanks are aluminum either...Snake River also has internal senders that never come in contact with the tank contents because they're encased in PVC...internal and external senders can be mixed and matched. Fwiw, I've had several SeaLand Tankwatch systems--their expensive ones. I'd never have anything but a Snake River system again. Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
While we're waiting on Peggie's response, I had Ronco put a 6" cleanout port
in my holding tank. I hope I never have to use it, but it's there if I need it. I lubed the threads very well with silicone grease, then ran a little bead of silicone caulking over the seam after it was closed tight to help insure no odors escaped. Worked well so far. "Marc" wrote in message ... Hi Peggie, while I got you on the line, I'm going with the Ronco B126 30 gal. Two 1.5" dip tubes, 1.5" fill, 3/4" vent., all top mounted. With the idea of keeping the number of penetrations to a minimum, is it necessary to have a clean out port? If yes, how about just a 3" boss with a plug instead of a port and plate? On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:15:11 GMT, Peggie Hall wrote: Marc wrote: Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) The Snake River system, hands down. I've yet to see any internal sensor last more than a few years...whereas, because the Snake River senders never come in contact with tank contents, they last literally for decades. The cost is another consideration...the only SeaLand system under $200 is their TankWatch I (about $50), which only lets you know when the tank is full (which I consider next to useless unless you spend all your time parked next to a pumpout). The single tank Snake River Mini for about $100 provides true 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and full readings...and their 4 tank system that lets you combine waste water and diesel in a single system is less than the price of any other single tank monitor. No problem if any of the tanks are aluminum either...Snake River also has internal senders that never come in contact with the tank contents because they're encased in PVC...internal and external senders can be mixed and matched. Fwiw, I've had several SeaLand Tankwatch systems--their expensive ones. I'd never have anything but a Snake River system again. Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Marc wrote:
Hi Peggie, while I got you on the line, I'm going with the Ronco B126 30 gal. Two 1.5" dip tubes, 1.5" fill, 3/4" vent., all top mounted. With the idea of keeping the number of penetrations to a minimum, is it necessary to have a clean out port? If yes, how about just a 3" boss with a plug instead of a port and plate? Hi Marc (oops...I still owe you a fax and an email)... That sounds fine to me, except that I'd go with a 1" vent instead of 3/4". The clean-out port that Ronco installs IS a 3" boss with threaded cap. You can get 4" or even 6" if you want. Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Marc wrote:
Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) Snake River. I recently installed these on my Catalina 30 for water and waste. Had some technical issues that needed working out and the Snake River folks were really great to deal with, and the products work great. Good price too. Keith Hughes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Rest asured that you WILL eventually use it. Good to
have. Doug "Keith" wrote in message ... While we're waiting on Peggie's response, I had Ronco put a 6" cleanout port in my holding tank. I hope I never have to use it, but it's there if I need it. I lubed the threads very well with silicone grease, then ran a little bead of silicone caulking over the seam after it was closed tight to help insure no odors escaped. Worked well so far. "Marc" wrote in message ... Hi Peggie, while I got you on the line, I'm going with the Ronco B126 30 gal. Two 1.5" dip tubes, 1.5" fill, 3/4" vent., all top mounted. With the idea of keeping the number of penetrations to a minimum, is it necessary to have a clean out port? If yes, how about just a 3" boss with a plug instead of a port and plate? On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 22:15:11 GMT, Peggie Hall wrote: Marc wrote: Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) The Snake River system, hands down. I've yet to see any internal sensor last more than a few years...whereas, because the Snake River senders never come in contact with tank contents, they last literally for decades. The cost is another consideration...the only SeaLand system under $200 is their TankWatch I (about $50), which only lets you know when the tank is full (which I consider next to useless unless you spend all your time parked next to a pumpout). The single tank Snake River Mini for about $100 provides true 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and full readings...and their 4 tank system that lets you combine waste water and diesel in a single system is less than the price of any other single tank monitor. No problem if any of the tanks are aluminum either...Snake River also has internal senders that never come in contact with the tank contents because they're encased in PVC...internal and external senders can be mixed and matched. Fwiw, I've had several SeaLand Tankwatch systems--their expensive ones. I'd never have anything but a Snake River system again. Peggie ---------- Peggie Hall Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987 Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor" http://www.seaworthy.com/html/get_ri...oat_odors.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Subject: Holding Tank Monitors
From: Glenn Ashmore Snake River. Marc wrote: Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) -- Glenn Ashmore I second that. Capt. Bill |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Holding Tank Monitors
Boat US had the Tank Watch system on sale a few months ago
Being the non-mechanical type of person I was able to install the Tank Watch System in about 30 minutes and it worked. My only concern is that it worked too good when the boat rocks or is not level the Tank Watch system moves with it On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 21:59:24 GMT, Marc wrote: Which is preferable? In tank sensors (ie. Sealand Tank Watch) or external tape sensors (ie. Snake River Acuguage) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Holding tank monitors | General | |||
Holding Tank Location | General | |||
holding tank plumbing | Boat Building | |||
Holding tank cradlle | Boat Building | |||
Place in Vancouver to plumb my holding tank? | General |