Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Wouldn't be very practical to have to file a FIA everytime I wanted to
get a WEFAX from NMG on the HF while cruising the islands. krj Larry W4CSC wrote: krj wrote in : What it means, if it passes is that all info that the NWS now provides, i.e. marine forecast, weatherfax, radar displays, ham skywarn, etc. would probably become a "pay for use" from a private company. The NWS could not provide these if a private company wants to provide them. The NWS still provides the data that we pay them to collect with our taxes, but will be provided "1) through a |set of data portals designed for volume access by commercial providers |of products or services". Meaning high speed data links like T1 or T3 to which the general public will not have access. Excerpts of S 786 below. Write or call your senator now to oppose this bill! krj I wonder if we simply file a Freedom Of Information Act request, required by other laws, to get the data. I got data from several agencies who were reluctant to send it successfully.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
krj wrote: What it means, if it passes is that all info that the NWS now provides, i.e. marine forecast, weatherfax, radar displays, ham skywarn, etc. would probably become a "pay for use" from a private company. The NWS could not provide these if a private company wants to provide them. The NWS still provides the data that we pay them to collect with our taxes, but will be provided "1) through a |set of data portals designed for volume access by commercial providers |of products or services". Meaning high speed data links like T1 or T3 to which the general public will not have access. Excerpts of S 786 below. Write or call your senator now to oppose this bill! krj | (b) COMPETITION WITH PRIVATE SECTOR- The Secretary of Commerce |shall not provide, or assist other entities in providing, a product or |service (other than a product or service described in subsection |(a)(1)) that is or could be provided by the private sector unless-- | | (1) the Secretary determines that the private sector is |unwilling or unable to provide such product or service; or | | (2) the United States Government is obligated to provide |such product or service under international aviation agreements to |provide meteorological services and exchange meteorological |information. | | (1) IN GENERAL- All data, information, guidance, |forecasts, and warnings received, collected, created, or prepared by |the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or the National |Weather Service shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be issued in |real time, and without delay for internal use, in a manner that ensures |that all members of the public have the opportunity for simultaneous |and equal access to such data, information, guidance, forecasts, and |warnings. | | (2) MODE OF ISSUANCE- Data, information, guidance, |forecasts, and warnings shall be issued under paragraph (1) through a |set of data portals designed for volume access by commercial providers |of products or services and by such other mechanisms as the Secretary |of Commerce considers appropriate for purposes of that paragraph. Brian Whatcott wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:14:36 -0700, Evan Gatehouse wrote: Brian Whatcott wrote: On a point of detail: if true, that motivation would not just be pork ( = supporting less than worthy projects because they benefit the home state), but rather purchase of influence - which is indictable if proved. Brian Whatcott. On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:41:13 -0400, krj wrote: Do you find it strange that Accuweather is based in Pa. and has contributed ~$11,000 to Santorum's campaign fund? Can you say "PORK". krj Tom R. wrote: I read in the New York Times this weekend that Sen. Rick Santorum (R PA) has introduced a bill to limit the amount of information that the National Weather Service, a taxpayer funded organization, may disseminate to the public. Apparently, Sen. Santorum has accepted campaign contributions from several private weather services located in Pennsylvania which have complained to him that information disseminated by NWS is too much competition for the pivate services and they want to restrict the free flow of weather information. Duh? Is there something wrong with this picture? Tom R. Google "Santorum" to find the out what it really means (for those who don't read Dan Savage's column) Evan Gatehouse I try to stay away from politics and politicians where possible, so I regret I probably won't be following up on this worthy suggestion. What does it really mean? Brian W I wrote an aide to our Independent Senator. It helps for these folks to realize they have constituents (voters or contributors) who care about an issue when they start horse trading. Some advocacy groups, e.g., Boat US, are already working on this. I know my Senator appreciated hearing about this since it means that not only my family, but trade organizations think this a bad bill. Those who think they are too smart or can't be bothered to voice their opinion in a democracy are fated to be governed by those who are dumber and demand to be heard. h -- To respond, obviously drop the "nospan"? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Tom R. wrote:
Since I believe he has already been bought and paid for, I wrote to both of my Senators instead. While I don't have enough personal knowledge one way or the other about the Senator's ethics, your approach is a good one. I just emailed both of the TX senators to alert them to this issue. Don W. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I hope your senators are more responsive the Barbara Mikulski here in
Maryland. She's a democrat in a state where they'd vote democratic even if she'd burned an orphanage the night before. NWS is very underfunded. I know the gentlemen who ran the office for the weather faxes and you wouldn't believe the heart ache they go through and few resources they have. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
My impression is that the Democrats are believers in big government, and lots
of government services. Seems like they would be supporting expanding the NWS services since they are a visible government service which helps save lives of both pilots and boaters. Maybe I'm wrong on that though (sigh). Don W. boatgeek wrote: I hope your senators are more responsive the Barbara Mikulski here in Maryland. She's a democrat in a state where they'd vote democratic even if she'd burned an orphanage the night before. NWS is very underfunded. I know the gentlemen who ran the office for the weather faxes and you wouldn't believe the heart ache they go through and few resources they have. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
(d) PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN DISCLOSURES- An officer, employee, or agent of
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Weather Service, or any other department or agency of the United States who by reason of that status comes into possession of any weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning that might influence or affect the market value of any product, service, commodity, tradable, or business may not-- (1) willfully impart, whether directly or indirectly, such weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning, or any part thereof, before the issuance of such weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning to the public under subsection (c); or (2) after the issuance of such weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning to the public under subsection (c), willfully impart comments or qualifications on such weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning, or any part thereof, to the public, except pursuant to an issuance that complies with that subsection. The way I read this even the Navy would have to encode their broadcasts to keep us from using them. Also no NWS people could speak at any cruising association meeting. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In article xq%re.122720$sy6.18607@lakeread04,
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote: (d) PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN DISCLOSURES- An officer, employee, or agent of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Weather Service, or any other department or agency of the United States who by reason of that status comes into possession of any weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning emphasis: that might influence or affect the market value of any product, service, commodity, tradable, or business may not-- (1) willfully impart, whether directly or indirectly, such weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning, or any part thereof, Emphasis: before the issuance of such weather data, information, guidance, forecast, or warning to the public under subsection (c); or The way I read this even the Navy would have to encode their broadcasts to keep us from using them. Also no NWS people could speak at any cruising association meeting. Naaah, it just means they can't play favorites. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Jere Lull" wrote in message The way I read this even the Navy would have to encode their broadcasts to keep us from using them. Also no NWS people could speak at any cruising association meeting. Naaah, it just means they can't play favorites. I hope you are being fecitious. The way the bill reads NWS or any other Federal agency personal with weather data is specifically and totally muzzeled. No statements or sharing weather information of any kind to anybody any time unless Accuweather can't do it. (Not won't but can't.) The commercial services are into mass marketing their product and are not going to provide a service if they can't make a profit and marine weather is not a profit maker. Say goodby to WEFAX. Say goodby to VHF weather radio. Say goodby to sea state and wind forcasts. You guys better get off your asses and say something to your Senators or we may be sailing blind or paying $50+ to get a weather forcast anytime you sail outside the harbor. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Glenn Ashmore wrote:
"Jere Lull" wrote in message The way I read this even the Navy would have to encode their broadcasts to keep us from using them. Also no NWS people could speak at any cruising association meeting. Naaah, it just means they can't play favorites. I hope you are being fecitious. The way the bill reads NWS or any other Federal agency personal with weather data is specifically and totally muzzeled. No statements or sharing weather information of any kind to anybody any time unless Accuweather can't do it. (Not won't but can't.) The commercial services are into mass marketing their product and are not going to provide a service if they can't make a profit and marine weather is not a profit maker. Say goodby to WEFAX. Say goodby to VHF weather radio. Say goodby to sea state and wind forcasts. You guys better get off your asses and say something to your Senators or we may be sailing blind or paying $50+ to get a weather forcast anytime you sail outside the harbor. Here is the reply I received from Senator Bill Nelson Please do not reply to this e-mail. If you need to send another message to Senator Nelson, please use the form on his Web site: http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm#email Thank you for contacting me regarding the National Weather Service. The weather information provided on its website is invaluable and should not be limited. The National Weather service is a branch of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). It is the primary source of weather data, forecasts, and warnings to the United States, and provides information to television broadcasters and private meteorology companies to prepare their forecasts. During the hurricane season of 2004, when Florida was being battered by Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne, the National Weather Service provided valuable information through its website to the people of Florida to help them prepare for the disaster. During these hurricanes, The National Weather Service website received billions of hits, breaking a government record previously held by NASA sites after the Mars rover landing last spring. Legislation has been introduced that would limit the ability of the National Weather Service to offer its information to the general public. S. 786, the National Weather Service Duties Act, introduced on April 14, 2005, would, among other things, prevent the National Weather Service from providing weather forecasts (with the exception of severe weather warnings) to the public on its website if a private company also is capable providing this information. I oppose the National Weather Service Duties Act because it has a variety of negative effects. This legislation would force consumers to get on-line weather information from commercial websites that are cluttered with pop-up ads and invasive solicitations, even though the consumer has already paid for the taxpayer-funded National Weather Service. It would prevent any National Weather Service forecaster from doing a one-on-one interview with a news reporter, and could even prevent the National Weather Service from providing any service on-line that is provided by a private vendor. I have written a letter to President Bush asking that he publicly oppose this attempt to push the weather service back to its pre-Internet era and limit the public's right to access government information. I appreciate your informed policy suggestions. Please do not hesitate to contact me again in the future. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:42:20 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore"
wrote: I hope you are being fecitious. The way the bill reads NWS or any other Federal agency personal with weather data is specifically and totally muzzeled. No statements or sharing weather information of any kind to anybody any time unless Accuweather can't do it. (Not won't but can't.) The commercial services are into mass marketing their product and are not going to provide a service if they can't make a profit and marine weather is not a profit maker. Say goodby to WEFAX. Say goodby to VHF weather radio. Say goodby to sea state and wind forcasts. You guys better get off your asses and say something to your Senators or we may be sailing blind or paying $50+ to get a weather forcast anytime you sail outside the harbor. Only the lowest permit themselves to conduct a newsgroup debate on the basis of spelling and punctuation - but when the target is as delicious and well-regarded as Glenn, why would that stop me? :-) Fecitious? Glenn fecit. Personal? Human relations is the PC term, these days... Muzzeled? A happy mix, perhaps, of muscled and muzzled. Goodby? A relative of Scooby. Forcast? E-less in Gaza..... I want some of the sauce that Glenn's using! Brian Whatcott, Altus, OK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Kerry really concedes | General | |||
Just a few names... | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |