Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "junktin" wrote in message news:TeASd.24583$NN.20453@edtnps89... Does anyone have practical experience using a consumer grade digital camera with high zoom and Image Stabilization on a sailboat (taking shots of distant scenery or other boats)? I am considering purchase of a newer camera with 10x or 12x zoom to replace my 3x capable camera. It occurred to me that Image Stabilization might be a good thing at these high zooms. I am considering cameras like the Canon S1 IS, Konica-Minolta Z3/Z5 or Panasonic Lumix series. While I read reviews that I.S. really helps remove a bit of "shakey hand", I am now wondering if the movement on a boat would be way too much for it and it might over-react giving a worse picture than without it. (Of course I could turn the I.S. off in this case but if I can't use it I wouldn't want to pay for it and add that complexity to the camera, as it is one more point of failure.) If anyone has used such a camera on a boat, I would love to hear your comments. Dave The image stabilization is for dampening out vibration due to shaky hands by using gyroscopic stabilization through the use of acceleration detectors and linear motors in the lens or camera. In my opinion it will not compensate at all for the action of a sailboat if you expect it to be used to track a subject as you pitch and roll. It will compensate for some pounding and your shaky hands. Of course you are putting an expensive camera in jeopardy of being damaged by the water. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:34:30 GMT, "Harvey"
wrote: "junktin" wrote in message news:TeASd.24583$NN.20453@edtnps89... Does anyone have practical experience using a consumer grade digital camera with high zoom and Image Stabilization on a sailboat (taking shots of distant scenery or other boats)? I am considering purchase of a newer camera with 10x or 12x zoom to replace my 3x capable camera. It occurred to me that Image Stabilization might be a good thing at these high zooms. I am considering cameras like the Canon S1 IS, Konica-Minolta Z3/Z5 or Panasonic Lumix series. While I read reviews that I.S. really helps remove a bit of "shakey hand", I am now wondering if the movement on a boat would be way too much for it and it might over-react giving a worse picture than without it. (Of course I could turn the I.S. off in this case but if I can't use it I wouldn't want to pay for it and add that complexity to the camera, as it is one more point of failure.) If anyone has used such a camera on a boat, I would love to hear your comments. Dave The image stabilization is for dampening out vibration due to shaky hands by using gyroscopic stabilization through the use of acceleration detectors and linear motors in the lens or camera. In my opinion it will not compensate at all for the action of a sailboat if you expect it to be used to track a subject as you pitch and roll. It will compensate for some pounding and your shaky hands. Of course you are putting an expensive camera in jeopardy of being damaged by the water. I agree, but it never occurred to me to mount the camera on the boat. I always use it hand-held and try to keep the shot framed. Thus the camera motion is aking to hand shake, not to the larger pitch and roll movements of the boat. Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC Let's Put the XXX back in Xmas |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rodney Myrvaagnes wrote: On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:34:30 GMT, "Harvey" wrote: "junktin" wrote in message news:TeASd.24583$NN.20453@edtnps89... Does anyone have practical experience using a consumer grade digital camera with high zoom and Image Stabilization on a sailboat (taking shots of distant scenery or other boats)? The image stabilization is for dampening out vibration due to shaky hands by using gyroscopic stabilization through the use of acceleration detectors and linear motors in the lens or camera. In my opinion it will not compensate at all for the action of a sailboat if you expect it to be used to track a subject as you pitch and roll. It will compensate for some pounding and your shaky hands. Of course you are putting an expensive camera in jeopardy of being damaged by the water. I agree, but it never occurred to me to mount the camera on the boat. I always use it hand-held and try to keep the shot framed. Thus the camera motion is aking to hand shake, not to the larger pitch and roll movements of the boat. Yes, I wouldn't be mounting it directly to the boat, or using a tripod on the rolling boat, so my body's corrections would damp out a lot of the motion of the boat. However I suspect what remains is still too much for the I.S. to cope with. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
About that boat fire Booby doubted | ASA | |||
Bought a Reinel 26' | ASA | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General | |||
Evinrude FICHT beats out Yamaha in JD Powers survey | General |